webfact Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 RICE-PLEDGING SCHEMECaretaker govt must explain scheme funding sources: DemocratsBANGKOK: -- The Democrat Party is calling on the caretaker government to make public the source or sources of the funds it will use to pay Bt4 billion a day to rice farmers, party spokesman Chavanond Inrarakomaltasut said on Monday.The government is trying to pay to the farmers under the rice-pledging scheme as they are long overdue and the farmers are suffering as a result.Chavanond noted that Caretaker Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Niwatthamrong Boonsongpaisan had affirmed that the government would start paying to the farmers for the rice pledged from February 17 at Bt4 billion per day. The minister said he expected that the government would pay for the Bt30billion loan within 35 to 40 days.The Democrat Party supported the caretaker government in its attempts to settle the overdue payments to the rice farmers but did not believe that the government could seek loans right away, he added."The government has to explain that how it will transfer money to the branches of the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) in the province to pay the farmers," Chavanond said.-- The Nation 2014-02-17 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesseFrank Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Well currently they get 5 Billion a week up to a total of 20 Billion from the GSB, and so far nadda from other banks. How do you stretch 5 Billion a week to pay 4 Billion each of those 7 days ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siripon Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The debt is 130 billion, not 30 billion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverSure Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 And there's a new crop about ready to harvest in some areas. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telecom Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Looks like yet another investigation for the NACC and the Constitutional Court. These idiots keep dragging themselves into the crap. I suppose they know they are all on the verge of being impeached and dissolved, so they don't care any more, they are attempting to claim back their 8 million lost voters from the north so they can regroup with another Thaksin led government. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pookiki Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkungbank Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I saw the news today the whole world weather is changing, London flood,Japan snow storm etc. This year the world market on commonduties will raise including rice price as panic many countries start buying food stuff for stock piles. It's good for Thailand to sell of the rice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post spirit47 Posted February 17, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramrod711 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. They are Thai citizens, they, like every other citizen are entitled to an explanation from these rip-off artists, that have no regard for any law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab4 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. They are Thai citizens, they, like every other citizen are entitled to an explanation from these rip-off artists, that have no regard for any law. Ah, so they are just asking as concerned citizens, nothing to do with exploiting the political situation at all. I'm glad they have at last embraced the rice farmers interests as their own. Why, it doesn't seem all that long ago they regarded them as illiterate peasants and red buffalos. Plus ca change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rubl Posted February 17, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. They are Thai citizens, they, like every other citizen are entitled to an explanation from these rip-off artists, that have no regard for any law. Ah, so they are just asking as concerned citizens, nothing to do with exploiting the political situation at all. I'm glad they have at last embraced the rice farmers interests as their own. Why, it doesn't seem all that long ago they regarded them as illiterate peasants and red buffalos. Plus ca change. Actually while still in the opposition in the now dissolved house they already asked many questions regarding the funding of the rice price pledging scheme. The then government had choosen to set up a resolving fund of THB 500 billion at BAAC (a state owned bank) with the idea of paying farmers and other parties involved and reimburse the BAAC from rice sales. That worked so good that another 160 billion had to be borrowed and now another 130 billion. The very fact that some farmers have not been paid for more than six or seven months suggests improper financial methods. Also the funds outside the National Budget made parliamentary scrutiny more difficult. Maybe the loss of 400 billion explains why no scrutiny was desired? The PM and her Pheu Thai cabinet ministers for Finance, Commerce and other interesting activities have continuesly stonewalled on the real figures. That's why now here we have some blaming the Democrats. Probably it's only those people who normally believe anything a government tells them. A real gullible lot. Edited February 17, 2014 by rubl 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pookiki Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! The Democrats were not part of the Pheu Thai led coalition government, they were in opposition and constantly stonewalled by the Ms. Yingluck c.s. The government disenfranchised them you might say. It is only out of concern that even with a dissolved house the Democrat party is still asking the same questions they've been asking for more than two years. Till now the Yingluck government has only given conflicting answers, no answers, and lies. Edited February 17, 2014 by rubl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesseFrank Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! Could it be because they smell a rat, which by the way is smellable from a mile away ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patjem Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! It's called checks and balances. The same function as opposition parties play in all democracies.... The issue being that PTP were too arrogant to accept that part of parliamentary process. Don't you remember? It was exactly that arrogance and avoidance that sparked protests in the first place. I don't agree with the way that Dems have played their hand, and could certainly have benefitted from better spin doctoring to basically say that there is no point in being in opposition if the government circumnavigate any calls for transparency anyway (instead they have illustrated themselves as cry-babies).Every Thai citizen should have a right to know how THEIR tax money is going to be spent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The debt is 130 billion, not 30 billion. and rising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Scamper Posted February 17, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) " The government has to explain that how it will transfer money to the branches of the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) in the province to pay the farmers," Chavanond said. " Indeed they do have to explain. But not for the satisfaction of the Democratic party, but the EC, the NACC, and the Constitutional Court. This profoundly unconstitutional gambit by Kittirat - whereby an interbank GBS loan to BAAC under the pretext of " boosting liquidity " - has been turned around to prop up the rice scheme - that Kittirat is constitutionally forbidden from doing - has exploded within the space of a single day. Faced with millions of baht of customer withdrawals this morning, a rebellion from within the banking union, and the admonishment of the administration by GBS for such pulling off such an unconstitutional scam - has resulted in today's loan to be immediately returned from BAAC to GBS, as well as a statement that BAAC wants to assure its customers that their investments are not being used for the rice scheme. Kittirat's " letter of comfort " has come back to bite him, because the issuance of such a letter is in violation of Article 181( 3). Kittirat cannot issue any guarantee for monies in a caretaker capacity. His impeachment over this is now all but certain. And the administration is back to square one. Plus new impeachment charges. Edited February 17, 2014 by Scamper 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuidave Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation.Yes, let's sweep state accountability under the rug. Governments run most efficiently when they don't have to be accountable. /sarcasm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rreddin Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. The Democrat Party have no credibilty and, after failing to contest the election, are a political non-entity. They blew the best chance they had in a generation of forming a coalition government with a popular mandate - there was no chance of them winning outright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuidave Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. They are Thai citizens, they, like every other citizen are entitled to an explanation from these rip-off artists, that have no regard for any law. Ah, so they are just asking as concerned citizens, nothing to do with exploiting the political situation at all.I'm glad they have at last embraced the rice farmers interests as their own. Why, it doesn't seem all that long ago they regarded them as illiterate peasants and red buffalos. Plus ca change. It's state monies, thus it is in EVERYBODIES interest, not just farmers, how this broke, not credit-worthy state is indebting the citizens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerdee123 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Well currently they get 5 Billion a week up to a total of 20 Billion from the GSB, and so far nadda from other banks. How do you stretch 5 Billion a week to pay 4 Billion each of those 7 days ? The can be the Thai definition of the economic term .... "multiplier effect" ... How to turn 5 billion into 4 billion a day for 7 days .... ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfmanjack Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Any one that pays taxes is a party to this scheme and has a right to an explanation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AleG Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Well currently they get 5 Billion a week up to a total of 20 Billion from the GSB, and so far nadda from other banks. How do you stretch 5 Billion a week to pay 4 Billion each of those 7 days ? The can be the Thai definition of the economic term .... "multiplier effect" ... How to turn 5 billion into 4 billion a day for 7 days .... ha ha It is easy to make a small fortune in Thailand; first, you start with a big fortune, then.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Well it is like this. the government is supposed to be open with all their dealings and bee accountable to all citizens be they Democrats poor farmers or dumb posters. It is there responsibility. I understand it is not red shirt democracy but that is just to bad live with it. The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. They are Thai citizens, they, like every other citizen are entitled to an explanation from these rip-off artists, that have no regard for any law. Ah, so they are just asking as concerned citizens, nothing to do with exploiting the political situation at all. I'm glad they have at last embraced the rice farmers interests as their own. Why, it doesn't seem all that long ago they regarded them as illiterate peasants and red buffalos. Plus ca change. You obviously have no idea of what went on in the house sessions. So I thought I would reply to you along with another poster who thinks like you. Birds of a feather and all that. How low does the Shinawatra's have to take Thailand before you decide they are not good for Thailand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimbc Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Policies are funded by taxpayer's money, so every taxpayer is owed an explanation. Learn about your democracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimbc Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! Every political party represents a group of the citizens. They are directed to protect their interest. Many political parties may not win even a seat, but they still have a voice. Because it's the voice of the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pookiki Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! Every political party represents a group of the citizens. They are directed to protect their interest. Many political parties may not win even a seat, but they still have a voice. Because it's the voice of the people. Every political party represents a group of people as long as they chose to participate in the 'system'. If they participate and elections and don't win a seat, then they are still participants in a multi-party system. There is a saying: "When the going gets tough, the tough get going!" After Parliament was dissolved, the Democrats chose to boycott. As much as you might deride and criticize PTP and Thaksin, they are the major party in a mutli-party democratic system. By choosing to boycott, the Democrats are abrogating their responsibility as a political party and disenfranchising their own members. Those who support Suthep and the Democrats decision to boycott are pinning their hopes on a coup in disposing of the PTP. How democratic! It isn't democracy, it's undemocratic political expediency. The easy way out is having a coup and resetting the clock. Thailand will only become a mature democracy when the people are willing to let the 'system' run the course and fully participate in elections. As you said, many parties did not win a seat but they were not afraid to participate. What is your choice? Fully participate or carp from the sidelines? Do you have faith in the democratic system? And I might add, if Thai citizens want more transparency, then it should be part of a parties' political program to require an 'open' government. This didn't occur overnight. Edited February 17, 2014 by pookiki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goat Roper Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 The Democrat Party is not part of the government. Why are they owed an explanation about the rice scheme? The rice farmers are the party to this dispute and it is the farmers to whom the government owes an explanation. Every Thai have the right to ask where the money come from. Whats wrong with you? Wonder sometimes how dumb a comment can be, and than anybody come and topple... Yes, I agree that every Thai citizen has the right to transparency from its government. But when the Democrats no longer have the balls to be part of the solution by being a part of the government, they have disenfranchised and disengaged themselves from the 'process'. Now that they are acting 'concerned' is totally disingenuous to me. Stay and fight or stay on the sidelines like they chose to do! Would that transparency you speak of include the convicted criminal on the run the 'Duke of Dubai'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentors Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Democrat Party - "this is the end my friend" THE DOORS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentors Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Democrat Party - "this is the end my friend" THE DOORS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now