robblok Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 If the PDRC can call for boycot of Shin companies why can the UDD not call for a boycot of artists? Which makes both sides wrong but same same. The UDD is not calling for a boycott against the artists. They are threatening them if they turn up to Chiang Mai. What happened to the spokes woman of PTP when she went shopping, got kidnapped by the PDRC. Both sides are limiting freedom of choice and freedom of movement. If you disagree try and walk into Silom with pro red shirt clothes on and see what happens to you. Who says that is a good thing.. it is not and should be stopped too. As for walking with red clothes to silom.. i much prefer that then to walk into a red village with yellow clothes. The most violent have always been the red shirts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunken Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 If the PDRC can call for boycot of Shin companies why can the UDD not call for a boycot of artists? Which makes both sides wrong but same same. The UDD is not calling for a boycott against the artists. They are threatening them if they turn up to Chiang Mai. What happened to the spokes woman of PTP when she went shopping, got kidnapped by the PDRC. Both sides are limiting freedom of choice and freedom of movement. If you disagree try and walk into Silom with pro red shirt clothes on and see what happens to you. The 'Thaksin where are you now' woman was not driven out of Bangkok. Why not find out about the difference between a boycott (which is voluntary) and a threat (which is intimidation) before putting finger to keyboard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HUAHIN62 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 If the PDRC can call for boycot of Shin companies why can the UDD not call for a boycot of artists? Which makes both sides wrong but same same. The UDD is not calling for a boycott against the artists. They are threatening them if they turn up to Chiang Mai. What happened to the spokes woman of PTP when she went shopping, got kidnapped by the PDRC. Both sides are limiting freedom of choice and freedom of movement. If you disagree try and walk into Silom with pro red shirt clothes on and see what happens to you. Who says that is a good thing.. it is not and should be stopped too. As for walking with red clothes to silom.. i much prefer that then to walk into a red village with yellow clothes. The most violent have always been the red shirts. As long as you see only one side you see nothing. Count the political related deaths since 2006 to see that you are wrong. The reds are open and direct in their voilence the yellows use courts, armies and men in black to hide their voilence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HUAHIN62 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 If the PDRC can call for boycot of Shin companies why can the UDD not call for a boycot of artists? Which makes both sides wrong but same same. The UDD is not calling for a boycott against the artists. They are threatening them if they turn up to Chiang Mai. What happened to the spokes woman of PTP when she went shopping, got kidnapped by the PDRC. Both sides are limiting freedom of choice and freedom of movement. If you disagree try and walk into Silom with pro red shirt clothes on and see what happens to you.The 'Thaksin where are you now' woman was not driven out of Bangkok.Why not find out about the difference between a boycott (which is voluntary) and a threat (which is intimidation) before putting finger to keyboard? So the spokeswomen was not intimidated when she was grabbed by the PDRC. She was kidnapped, look at the definition of that. Why are they boycotting the Shin related businesses if they are not trying to intimidate the Shins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunken Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 So the spokeswomen was not intimidated when she was grabbed by the PDRC. She was kidnapped, look at the definition of that. Why are they boycotting the Shin related businesses if they are not trying to intimidate the Shins. I didn't say whether she was intimidated or not - must you twist others' posts? BTW it is off topic Once again try and learn that a boycott is not intimidation. Do you want it spelled out and defined in order to understand a simple distinction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantomfiddler Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Threats, from a red-shirt ? I don,t believe it I was planning a trip up there but will give it a miss and spend my money elsewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers Please stop giving us cheers!!!!!!!! 99% of ThaiVisa members do not use ear drops, so please…………….. I thought it was because after every post he orders another beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchuetzRob Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers the freedom of choice - sounds good. let the artist perform - the people have a choice to join the concert or not. banning artists is rather a sign of dictatorship, and is that not the thing the red shirts so vehemently oppose...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimamey Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers I think there is blame on both sides but I think he's suggesting something a little stronger than a boycott. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkksteviejai Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers Got to love the Red shirt freedom of choice, with a good threat of violence. if artists who support the PDRC go to Chiang Mai, red shirts will go to welcome them" Apichart said on his one-minute clip. I think they might have had an inkling that this sort of backlash might occur. They were very naive if they thought otherwise. Fair enough though, there standing up for what they believe in. Sent from my GT-S7562 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers And was it not first Chalerm with his list of Companies, who did not contribute to the PTP? What next, any performer at a red protest not welcome in Bangkok or the south??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfmanjack Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers Freedom of choice would be if a singer did a concert in Chaing Mai and no one showed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers Freedom of choice would be if a singer did a concert in Chaing Mai and no one showed up. Much easier to tell the singer "do not show up, or else", rather than tell their kid not to attend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smileydude Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Tit for tat is a common characteristic of those who don't know, don't see and don't think. All they know is anger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesDean3 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Hey, just last week many anti government backers were backing a 'boycott" little did they realize that boycott is a double edge sword. That can be used by all, any performer should paid the price for their own decisions that the majority of people disagree with! They also can pick not to drink a certain beer or energy drink, that what freedom is all about "The freedom of Choice". Cheers I guess your freedom of choice starts and ends with "if you are not with us then we'll beat you up"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now