What reforms? What reforms? No one is going to change the dice. It is just a power struggle.

Reforms? What rubbish. No one can make reforms because it would close the door on their own people.

Of course they can make reforms, and the reforms absolutely should affect all sides.

Edited May 8, 201412 yr by Piichai

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Thaksin the peoples favorite

Suthep not the peoples favorite

so chew on that you yellow shirted losers who will never see power except by devious and questionable means

Not everyone's favourite , if he was he would come back and face the music , he's sister has more guts than Thaskin has.

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

alt=coffee1.gif width=32 height=24>

Well said Sir

Guys, nest time "think" before you do something STUID! I guess your leader was to blame because...."she came from election".

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

Actually it was the pug persona I had hoped to see back. Surely the most lovable thing about you!

Yawn.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Pheu Thai, Thaksin says removal of nine ministers unfair

Sure it was...... should have been the lot of them, and all their bent senators as well.

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

Click on the Pic for my reaction

Edited May 8, 201412 yr by tezzainoz

What a joke.

PM sacks a civil servant and gets thrown out. (of course replaced with a supporter, same in all western democracies)

Previous PM thrown out for cooking omlettes on TV

Both elected unlike the ones from the other party who broke up demos with their mates from the army murdering 100's

Despite this farangs on here (who have no vested interests) are rejoicing at yet another judicial coup. Why?

What a joke.

PM sacks a civil servant and gets thrown out. (of course replaced with a supporter, same in all western democracies)

Previous PM thrown out for cooking omlettes on TV

Both elected unlike the ones from the other party who broke up demos with their mates from the army murdering 100's

Despite this farangs on here (who have no vested interests) are rejoicing at yet another judicial coup. Why?

Surely with 650+ posts to your name, you must be aware of the corruption that these people have been wallowing in? Irrespective of the other side's faults, one can only be pleased when nepotism and corruption are given their just rewards.

Or have you been posting solely in the farming thread....and living abroad?

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

We all know what you're trying to say Moonao......but even you would have to agree, that with YL gone...the PTP in tatters, Thaksin banging his head against the wall.....that Thailand will be a better country without her...and Chalerm, Plodrasop...etc........

Thaksin the peoples favorite

Suthep not the peoples favorite

so chew on that you yellow shirted losers who will never see power except by devious and questionable means

Yes we can see that from the posters on here as well as the hundreds of thousands who've marched and camped out against him in the streets - the issan red villagers favourite only...........i as for questionable means, Id call M79 grenades and vote rigging, intimidation and murder questionable means .............so if your going to insult people crawl back under your rock monkey!!!

Edited May 8, 201412 yr by love1012

What a joke.

PM sacks a civil servant and gets thrown out. (of course replaced with a supporter, same in all western democracies)

Previous PM thrown out for cooking omlettes on TV

Both elected unlike the ones from the other party who broke up demos with their mates from the army murdering 100's

Despite this farangs on here (who have no vested interests) are rejoicing at yet another judicial coup. Why?

Perhaps because some farangs don't reduce their worldview into simplistic, incomplete and biased distortions of the facts so as to reinforce their preconceived ideas?

The Thai press knows how to engender conflict in Thailand. They've begun to feature quotes from Thaksin again. And profiling him in the Thai news. Just what the doctor ordered.

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

Wait .. I must be missing something.

There was a cabinet decision according to Yingluck, who is the head of the cabinet.

The decision was to improperly oust an individual from his position, and replace him with a relative of the PM.

Can someone please explain why this is a "political" and "corrupt" decision?

It seems like a pretty open and shut case, as the facts do not appear to be in dispute.

Yingluck has always had the interests of the Thai rice farmers in mind. An interest that has only grown over her time in power.

Currently growing at 4%pa in an offshore bank account.

...once again, who gives a tinker's cuss what Thaksin thinks...?!

Maybe if you hadn't been a corrupt tool and actually paid your taxes then the yellows wouldn't have had a reason to kick you out in the first place. You overstepped your boundaries and now you are a fugitive on the run, your time is up Thaksin, it's time someone else takes over PTP.

Yingluck however, didn't engage in any corruption and was kicked out unfairly. The reason she was kicked out was because of her last name and the powers that be could not handle another Shinawatra in power.

Edited May 9, 201412 yr by anantha92

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

Spot on, Sir. The world is in agreement but somehow most TV members seem to believe all the Thai propaganda and cite "corruption, corruption, corruption" just like Suthep and the newspapers without any hard evidence that the PM has been corrupt at all. I find it very interesting that most TV members are so gullible without any apparent ability to actually look at the bigger picture here in Thailand and analyse and question what has happened. To my eyes it's clearly a game that's being played to grab power and hold onto it and to ensure that certain sections of the society remain unchallenged.

The government could not be trusted. Now it's official that the courts and NACC can't be trusted. We don't even have to mention the police and army which never could never be trusted. The people in this country deserves so much better than being governed by criminal vultures and thugs. There is no rule of law whatsoever, but why do I care. Here is cheap women, booze and the sun is shining....

Boo hoo hoo...they removed members of my family...from serving themselves at the public expense...how tragic...

For the first time in my life I have some doubts about freedom of the press. This country would be better off with a stringent ban of publishing any comments made via twitter, facebook, phone ins and interviews from a convicted fugitive criminal.

The Thai press knows how to engender conflict in Thailand. They've begun to feature quotes from Thaksin again. And profiling him in the Thai news. Just what the doctor ordered.

Thaksin says removal of nine ministers unfair

A famous quote from a guy who thinks the extrajudicial killings of 3000 people is fair and just.

Moaning about unfair in a legal contact at shows u know u haven't a legal leg to stand on.

Since when do courts make fair judgements?

Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Thailand

Here defence was I'am a Puppet So Puppteers must go. EP so Facto hit the road Jacko

" Noppadon quoted Thaksin's comment that the legal complaint was directed only at Yingluck, so the court should not have broadened their consideration to the other Cabinet members. "

And that's why Thaksin isn't a lawyer, and Noppadon shouldn't be. The decision to transfer had to be approved by the cabinet. Therefore, they have to stand behind that decision. Yingluck in her testimony in fact said that she shared responsibility with the cabinet. The court agreed.

Nailed it.

The Thai press knows how to engender conflict in Thailand. They've begun to feature quotes from Thaksin again. And profiling him in the Thai news. Just what the doctor ordered.

Thaksin says removal of nine ministers unfair

A famous quote from a guy who thinks the extrajudicial killings of 3000 people is fair and just.

It was fair because all of them are equally dead.

Of course its unfair, dirty attempts at power grabs usually are.

Wall St Journal, BBC, international diplomats, international SE Asian academics, countless independent analysts domestically and abroad pretty much agree that its unfair.

Just a minority of noisy yellow shirt anti-democratic Thaksin hating people domestically are under the illusion that it was somehow a "neutral" decision, but they live in their own world surrounded by a yellow bubble.

Please explain what was unfair ???.......Quoting opinions of other people and institutuions doesn't influence anything...they are not the Court that makes decisions. There were people who claimed that Charles Manson was treated unfairly or that Hitler was misunderstood etc.....none of which really matters.