Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Italy in the final. Bugger.

The 1994 final was the most boring in the history of the tournament (0-0 then to penalties) thanks to the boring, negative approach the Italians took and now they are there again.

Pele has compained about the playing style of the Italians:

http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,...7-23215,00.html :D

Respected German magazine Der Spiegel called them 'parasites' and 'mamma's boys':

http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/5746872 :D

Me, I just think they are boring with a dash of luck... :o

Posted

Imagine a Portugal vs Italy final.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted
Italy in the final. Bugger.

The 1994 final was the most boring in the history of the tournament (0-0 then to penalties) thanks to the boring, negative approach the Italians took and now they are there again.

Pele has compained about the playing style of the Italians:

http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,...7-23215,00.html :D

why wouldnt pele complain?, brazil is out.

Respected German magazine Der Spiegel called them 'parasites' and 'mamma's boys':

http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/5746872 :D

not surprising, germany lost. kinda same thing with the english going out and they go finding scapegoats to print full colour pages on "The Sun"

Me, I just think they are boring with a dash of luck... :o

I'd recommend switching channels on your tv set to something else that might seem worth watching come this early monday morning or just sleep it off.

and really did you watch the same match i did between italy and germany? was totally a wonderful game. boring?? i don't think so.

edited to correct grammer in case some linguist comes by checking people's posts.

Posted

there won't be any teams in the final this year to make it worth watching. two middle class european teams just isn't a good world cup final. germany vs. brazil or argentina vs. brazil, maybe italy vs. argentina would have been a different story...but...

Posted

This year France have played the best football , they will crush Portugal tonight and embarass the Eyeties in the final. European football is the best.

:o

Posted
there won't be any teams in the final this year to make it worth watching. two middle class european teams just isn't a good world cup final. germany vs. brazil or argentina vs. brazil, maybe italy vs. argentina would have been a different story...but...

how does one classify a team as middle class european team? so what are teams like japan, korea, ghana, ukraine etc etc fall into? who are the high class european teams and low class european teams? :o

Posted

who are the high class european teams and low class european teams? :D

England are High class , the rest of Europe are Low Class.

:o

Why ?Cause they have gota bit of Posh ?

:D

Posted

Oh the Joy to see the Germans crash out made my night (early morning).

I thought it was a great game and the Italians played much better than the Germans.

But near the end thinking bloody Germans will steal it again as alway. This time they did not.

70 years never beaten at that event. Gone west now. What a great result. Makes the Ausy team effort look better and better. :o

Posted
there won't be any teams in the final this year to make it worth watching. two middle class european teams just isn't a good world cup final. germany vs. brazil or argentina vs. brazil, maybe italy vs. argentina would have been a different story...but...

I quote you again here .... :D

but I think - you better abstain from any predictions - coz you've got some very recent experience, huh ?

oh, and that was good point tigerbeer has made - how do you define "middle class" team ?

and then - where does that leave ... Switzerland (as I recall you support it and are from there?), if you claim that France (well, at least once World Cup and once Euro Cup champs - quite recenlty) and Italy (trice WOrld cup and once Euro champs) are second class. Switzerland NEVER ever (and that's a long time - since their first time participation in World cup in '34 and 6 more times after) made even to the semis, only trice to quarter-final (and even that last time was ... ooops, more than half century ago ! :D ) - and this latest time were beaten by rookies Urkain, who's come for their very first time to tournament.

England are High class , the rest of Europe are Low Class.

nice joke, man ! could any MOds put this post in the appropriate Jokes section where it belongs ?

somehow this "HIGH class" couldn't make it to become champs already 40 years (that was the ONLY time ever), why I wonder they let "the rest of Europe are Low Class" deny them due honour time adn again, also for almost a hlg century ?

The 1994 final was the most boring in the history of the tournament (0-0 then to penalties) thanks to the boring, negative approach the Italians took and now they are there again.

are you sure about that? they only say about this final match that :

USA 1994

... for the first time in FIFA World Cup history, it all came down to penalties.

BTW - that time in '94 semi-finals they (Germans) also won on penalties against "THE BEST HIGH CLASS EURO TEAM" (guess who, chonabot ?

looks like Germans love it to win on penalties, while the only "Euro High Class" team - loose on them ! :o

the most boring was ... Germany-Argentina in '90 - as I've quoted earlier official FIFA World Cup Histoy web page in another thread (see post #28) - Italy 1990 - where somehow they say it was Germany who's played "dull defensive" game and won ONLY on last penalty. and they THAT match was "the least inspiring in the history of the competition".

once again - I'm glad that Germany lost and out ! :D Klose shouldn't have kicked Argentinian goalie in the ribs amd especially get away with it without even yellow card but rather come out as a hero who's scored the ONLY goal in whole match (barely preventing Germany from being ousted already that time, before even reaching semis). and even that he could do ONLY after injured guy was replaced bty less experienced and younger substitute !

I think France (if they make it, which I think they have a good chance to) will show a good play. Italy last night played well too. at leas they were able to take ball from Germans sooooo easily most of times - like from children. and they did that almost without fouls - Germans were those who's commited most of fouls.

Portugese might prove being a "dark horse" though - their coach Scolari is worth to be considerate about.

Posted
and then - where does that leave ... Switzerland (as I recall you support it and are from there?), if you claim that France (well, at least once World Cup and once Euro Cup champs - quite recenlty) and Italy (trice WOrld cup and once Euro champs) are second class. Switzerland NEVER ever (and that's a long time - since their first time participation in World cup in '34 and 6 more times after) made even to the semis, only trice to quarter-final (and even that last time was ... ooops, more than half century ago ! :o ) - and this latest time were beaten by rookies Urkain, who's come for their very first time to tournament.

i never said switzerland are a high class team, i think they're far from it. switzerland are a low class team, just like ukraine, ghana, ecuador, etc. these teams may have good runs at some world cups, but they don't have a a proven stable record of performing well, like germany, england, brazil, etc. i'm not stating "high class" teams have to become world champions every year, but just perform well generally.

another team i thought was "high class" is argentina, until they started a fist fight in their game against germany. they missed their penalties (2 of them) and deserved to lose, just like switzerland (who missed 3), but they were bad losers and that dropped them into the lowest class in my books.

Posted

yes, true, you didn't say that as I recall now...

but neither did you say yet - what's your definition of a high class team, even though you came close to it with few statements.

I still rather agree with Scolari (former Brazilian and current Protugese coach) that "teams that paly beautifull football are usually the first on the flight home". that is other prhasing of what you said "stable record of performing well".

I mean, if the whole idea of this tournament was - who PERFORMS (not scores) better, perhaps it would be organised in entirely different fashion, and final won't even matter - in the sense "who scores more goals" - right? perhaps England (or who was another one playing "beautifull football" this time?) would have bee champs already even though they are out, not the one who'll win match on July 9th ?

so, com'on man - be specific !

Argentina was and actually still is my second favorite after Brazil. I don't care that they had fighting with Germans - that German guy provoked them. yes, they could and probably should / must have accepted defeat with better attitude. say, Brazil, didn't fight. but I prefectly understand them - they felt somewhat cheated. their golakeeper was REALY injured (I wonder - was it intentional?), no punishment done to responsible person (Klose), because of that less experienced goalkeeper has let balls hit their net. AND after all this - some bastard was trying to shush them up - like "shut the <deleted> up, you loosers".

I am surprised you are quick to judge Argentinian side and justify the actions of that German guy, as well as German manager who's jumped into melee.

Posted

there won't be any teams in the final this year to make it worth watching. two middle class european teams just isn't a good world cup final. germany vs. brazil or argentina vs. brazil, maybe italy vs. argentina would have been a different story...but...

I quote you again here .... :D

but I think - you better abstain from any predictions - coz you've got some very recent experience, huh ?

oh, and that was good point tigerbeer has made - how do you define "middle class" team ?

and then - where does that leave ... Switzerland (as I recall you support it and are from there?), if you claim that France (well, at least once World Cup and once Euro Cup champs - quite recenlty) and Italy (trice WOrld cup and once Euro champs) are second class. Switzerland NEVER ever (and that's a long time - since their first time participation in World cup in '34 and 6 more times after) made even to the semis, only trice to quarter-final (and even that last time was ... ooops, more than half century ago ! :D ) - and this latest time were beaten by rookies Urkain, who's come for their very first time to tournament.

England are High class , the rest of Europe are Low Class.

nice joke, man ! could any MOds put this post in the appropriate Jokes section where it belongs ?

somehow this "HIGH class" couldn't make it to become champs already 40 years (that was the ONLY time ever), why I wonder they let "the rest of Europe are Low Class" deny them due honour time adn again, also for almost a hlg century ?

The 1994 final was the most boring in the history of the tournament (0-0 then to penalties) thanks to the boring, negative approach the Italians took and now they are there again.

are you sure about that? they only say about this final match that :

USA 1994

... for the first time in FIFA World Cup history, it all came down to penalties.

BTW - that time in '94 semi-finals they (Germans) also won on penalties against "THE BEST HIGH CLASS EURO TEAM" (guess who, chonabot ?

looks like Germans love it to win on penalties, while the only "Euro High Class" team - loose on them ! :D

the most boring was ... Germany-Argentina in '90 - as I've quoted earlier official FIFA World Cup Histoy web page in another thread (see post #28) - Italy 1990 - where somehow they say it was Germany who's played "dull defensive" game and won ONLY on last penalty. and they THAT match was "the least inspiring in the history of the competition".

once again - I'm glad that Germany lost and out ! :D Klose shouldn't have kicked Argentinian goalie in the ribs amd especially get away with it without even yellow card but rather come out as a hero who's scored the ONLY goal in whole match (barely preventing Germany from being ousted already that time, before even reaching semis). and even that he could do ONLY after injured guy was replaced bty less experienced and younger substitute !

I think France (if they make it, which I think they have a good chance to) will show a good play. Italy last night played well too. at leas they were able to take ball from Germans sooooo easily most of times - like from children. and they did that almost without fouls - Germans were those who's commited most of fouls.

Portugese might prove being a "dark horse" though - their coach Scolari is worth to be considerate about.

It was a joke, thanks for boring us with some grey drivel that we already knew....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :o

Posted
It was a joke, thanks for boring us with some grey drivel that we already knew....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :D

I knew that was a Joke, that's why I've congradulated you for it and requested Modes to move it to the Jokes Forum. thanks for boring me with what I already knew (as it is evident from my post).

on second thought - I think it is boring joke, which everyone knew already - so, better not to move it to Jokes section, which supposed to be NOT boring.

other thing were addressed to others, not you .... :o so, no need to sum up everything I said and rally others to your cause. let them speak for themselves.

Posted

Must admit the Italians were the better Team, but imagine a final Italy-England, I guess the English would pay dearly.

Italy played very concentrated and deserved the win.

Hope for a final Italy against France, of course Germany-Brazil,Argentina-Brazil or Argentina-France sounds better , but we will enjoy a good game.

Posted

It was a joke, thanks for boring us with some grey drivel that we already knew....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :D

I knew that was a Joke, that's why I've congradulated you for it and requested Modes to move it to the Jokes Forum. thanks for boring me with what I already knew (as it is evident from my post).

on second thought - I think it is boring joke, which everyone knew already - so, better not to move it to Jokes section, which supposed to be NOT boring.

other thing were addressed to others, not you .... :o so, no need to sum up everything I said and rally others to your cause. let them speak for themselves.

You Smell.

[Not a Joke]

Posted
You Smell.

[Not a Joke]

well, you - FLAME

('Flaming' is best defined as posting or responding to a message in a way clearly intended to incite useless arguments, rants, and/or for launching personal attacks, insulting, being hateful, useless criticism, name calling, swearing and other bad behavior or comments meant to incite anger. - Forum Rules)

I was adressing your POINT (both in first and even in my second comment to you), you - make personal attacks, as if you have nothing ele to say.

and this is also NOT a joke.

Posted
I still rather agree with Scolari (former Brazilian and current Protugese coach) that "teams that paly beautifull football are usually the first on the flight home". that is other prhasing of what you said "stable record of performing well".

ok agreed, i have a different opinion than scolari has.

I am surprised you are quick to judge Argentinian side and justify the actions of that German guy, as well as German manager who's jumped into melee.

i'm just making comments. true, i make more comments about some teams than others, but then again if you want to talk about pizza you don't hold a news conference about sushi or tomyum. i just write what comes to my mind and either you like it or you don't, i dont want to start arguments about each and every of the 32 teams.

Posted

You Smell.

[Not a Joke]

well, you - FLAME

('Flaming' is best defined as posting or responding to a message in a way clearly intended to incite useless arguments, rants, and/or for launching personal attacks, insulting, being hateful, useless criticism, name calling, swearing and other bad behavior or comments meant to incite anger. - Forum Rules)

I was adressing your POINT (both in first and even in my second comment to you), you - make personal attacks, as if you have nothing ele to say.

and this is also NOT a joke.

Ewwwwww pass the listerine........ :o

Posted

whatever your opinion is - whjether it is same as Scolari's or someone else' or not - I ONLY requested you to explain it, for simple reason - because I want to know what is high class team for you. believe it or not - I am genuinly interested. NOT becase I wanted to argue with you. you take me wrong.

and I've merely pointed out (you can see I was not alone - someone else asked you the same) that so far you didn't define what you mean by mid or high class.

yes, sure - please DO speak up your mind, why not.

there is no question of starting argument or even liking it or not if I don't even know - WHAT it is you think by your statements.

so, could you please now explain yourself ? I did explainations on your request.

Posted
so, could you please now explain yourself ?

not today, i'm sick with fever for sleeping with the air conditioning running too low and having no shirt on all night. i'll gladly explain further in a few days when i feel better, just not in the mood today.

Posted

alright - fair enough, will look forward to it. belive it or not - I like many of your posts and their style, as well as your approach - having alternative (than others or "majority") opinions on many things.

Posted
alright - fair enough, will look forward to it. belive it or not - I like many of your posts and their style, as well as your approach - having alternative (than others or "majority") opinions on many things.

Thanks!

Oh you were talking to someone else......... :D

[Not all humour is the same Thank God :o ]

Posted
alright - fair enough, will look forward to it. belive it or not - I like many of your posts and their style, as well as your approach - having alternative (than others or "majority") opinions on many things.

lets just say if i see 100 people walking into one direction, i'd rather go the other direction to see where they're coming from rather than following all of them wherever they're going.

Posted

that's exactly what I mean by your attitude what I like ! although not necessary the best way to be popular and prolific on TV ..... :o most would rather "float on the main current"

Posted

alright - fair enough, will look forward to it. belive it or not - I like many of your posts and their style, as well as your approach - having alternative (than others or "majority") opinions on many things.

lets just say if i see 100 people walking into one direction, i'd rather go the other direction to see where they're coming from rather than following all of them wherever they're going.

Perhaps a massive wave? :o

Posted

dear chonabot,

is that how you became SOOO advanced (PLatinum - wow !!!) TV member - by making short one-line mocking posts with smilie or two, or ONLY smilie below mutliple quotes of others' posts ?

funny that you even try to continue flaming when I've already stoped talking to you and reply to other person's post ! you just can't help it, huh ?

hmmm, seems like flaming is your credo, since now you are trying to bait another person, who has been talking to me, not you ?

what a FRAGRANCE you spread ! :o keep it up !

Posted
dear chonabot,

is that how you became SOOO advanced (PLatinum - wow !!!) TV member - by making short one-line mocking posts with smilie or two, or ONLY smilie below mutliple quotes of others' posts ?

funny that you even try to continue flaming when I've already stoped talking to you and reply to other person's post ! you just can't help it, huh ?

hmmm, seems like flaming is your credo, since now you are trying to bait another person, who has been talking to me, not you ?

what a FRAGRANCE you spread ! :D keep it up !

We all have our purpose , one day you will find yours.

[Another great oneliner]

My comment to Rainman, whom I worship, was merely an analogy based upon lateral thinking, why

do you think it concerned you ?

Have a trawl through my so impressive backlog if that floats your boat.

btw how many 70 page plus threads have you started?

Oh, none.

:o

Posted

wow, such a GREAT one-liner, with such a depth of wisdom !

about 70-pages threads.... (BTW - the RAIN.... - was it yours? classic !)

oh, well - now, THAT is the criteria - who makes more long threads, right? alright - you are better than me, you win and I loose - satisfied?

if you wanna know - I am neither keen on starting many pages treads nor having a lot of posts. as you can see even Rainman who's joined 2 months after me, has more than twice number of posts than me, not to speak of some others, who perhaps have more posts than you, while joined only a year ago or less.

I do not worship Rianman (as you said you do), but I said the truth - I like his attitude, although not necessarily agree with all his opinions and statements. but then - it is natural, people tend to defer. another thing is - at least he manages to keep it within margins of point itself, not jumps to personal attacks. at least so far I haven't seen such.

and I am merely speaking up my mind as he does.

now, back to the topic - Italy, not Germany is in the final ! :o

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...