Jump to content

Cancer kills three 9/11 firefighters on the same day


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Cancer kills three 9/11 firefighters on the same day

NEW YORK: -- Three firefighters who were on duty at Ground Zero during the 9/11 attacks have died on the same day from cancer, fire officials have said.

Lieutenant Howard Bischoff, 58, and firefighters Robert Leaver, 56, and Daniel Heglund, 58, died within hours of one another on Monday.

Thousands of people who helped the 9/11 rescue efforts have been diagnosed with illness, including cancer.

But doctors say it is unclear whether sickness can be linked to the attacks.

Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro described the three men's deaths as a "painful reminder that 13 years later we continue to pay a terrible price for the department's heroic efforts".

"On that day when first responders arrived, the air was toxic and remained toxic for many months afterward," said the president of the Uniformed Fire Officers Association, James Lemonda.

Some 1,000 deaths have been linked to illnesses caused by toxic dust issuing from wreckage at Ground Zero.

Read More: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29381978

bbclogo.jpg
-- BBC 2014-09-26

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

oddly enough the wtc was acquired a few months prior to 911 as was a multibillion dollar insurance policy. very strange business move considering the buildings required a billion dollar asbestos removal job. just coincidently the wtc owner and family members who were typically on the premises workdays all had prior engagements to be somewhere else on that day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

Asbestos in that form is not a health hazard...well, until it is pulverized and becomes airborne through explosion.

We applied it for years on steampipes and as you know, it has long been used as a heat-retardant on structural steel I-beams. I remember when it used to come in bags and placed into large vats and it being hand-mixed by a guy stirring over the top of the vat and then it being painted on very thick.

Its disgusting that three firefighters can all die within hours of each other of the same illness and anyone can still be in denial of the source of exposure. Rotten insurance companies .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

oddly enough the wtc was acquired a few months prior to 911 as was a multibillion dollar insurance policy. very strange business move considering the buildings required a billion dollar asbestos removal job. just coincidently the wtc owner and family members who were typically on the premises workdays all had prior engagements to be somewhere else on that day.

What is strange about having an insurance policy for the value of the building? In fact, a loan would not be made without one. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck of a coincidence. 3 men doing the same job. enter a building on the same day and 13 years ago and die of the same illness hours apart.

This makes for a great math puzzle -- what is the likelihood that three firefighters, who all fought the same fire, would die on the same day 13 years later?

When I was taking a statistics class the teacher threw this one at us: JFK was assassinated in Nov. 1963. By the end of 1965 twenty-four of the witnesses were dead, what is the likelihood of this happening? Well, it at least served to keep us awake in an otherwise boring class.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

Laced isn't even close. WTC wa made of the stuff. Spray on fire proofing for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

oddly enough the wtc was acquired a few months prior to 911 as was a multibillion dollar insurance policy. very strange business move considering the buildings required a billion dollar asbestos removal job. just coincidently the wtc owner and family members who were typically on the premises workdays all had prior engagements to be somewhere else on that day.

What is strange about having an insurance policy for the value of the building? In fact, a loan would not be made without one. Right?

apparently it went above and beyond the required amount and must have had a clause to not exclude an "act of war".

Edited by atyclb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck of a coincidence. 3 men doing the same job. enter a building on the same day and 13 years ago and die of the same illness hours apart.

This makes for a great math puzzle -- what is the likelihood that three firefighters, who all fought the same fire, would die on the same day 13 years later?

When I was taking a statistics class the teacher threw this one at us: JFK was assassinated in Nov. 1963. By the end of 1965 twenty-four of the witnesses were dead, what is the likelihood of this happening? Well, it at least served to keep us awake in an otherwise boring class.

A search on your teacher's question brings up 18 in 3 years. The odds? 1 in 100,000 TRILLION.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck of a coincidence. 3 men doing the same job. enter a building on the same day and 13 years ago and die of the same illness hours apart.

This makes for a great math puzzle -- what is the likelihood that three firefighters, who all fought the same fire, would die on the same day 13 years later?

When I was taking a statistics class the teacher threw this one at us: JFK was assassinated in Nov. 1963. By the end of 1965 twenty-four of the witnesses were dead, what is the likelihood of this happening? Well, it at least served to keep us awake in an otherwise boring class.

clearly you are a conspiracy theorist and your post should be deleted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTC 1&2 were laced with asbestos... There were several law suits over the years to force them to remove the asbestos fire retardant, but the owners kept filing appeals... They finally lost the last appeal and were being forced to begin removal just prior to the 9/11 event... It was going to cost billions to remediate the problem...

The cnspiracy theorists must love this angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these conspiracy theories, Where are the links to reputable sites? I've never heard any of these conspiracy theories before.

Links to reputable news sources or it didn't happen.

I don't believe that news is an accurate reflection of what "did happen" or "didn't happen" in the world. The news is all controlled and owned by the same people. The news shows you what they want you to see.

Anyways, to answer your question about "news proving it happened" here is your link to an interesting Cspan news report:

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/wow-cspan-aired-this-unbelievable-date-aired-september-7-2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...