-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
6
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Wednesday 2 October 2024
Prawit No Longer Accepts Salary, Entitlement Pay As MP By Thai Newsroom Reporters Palang Pracharath leader Prawit Wongsuwan. Top photo: Thai Rath, Front Page photo: Naewna PALANG PRACHARATH LEADER Prawit Wongsuwan has today (Oct. 1) resolved to no longer accept the salary and entitlement pay to which he is eligible as an MP and to return all the money which he has earlier accepted. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1339593-prawit-no-longer-accepts-salary-entitlement-pay-as-mp/ -
0
Prawit No Longer Accepts Salary, Entitlement Pay As MP
PALANG PRACHARATH LEADER Prawit Wongsuwan has today (Oct. 1) resolved to no longer accept the salary and entitlement pay to which he is eligible as an MP and to return all the money which he has earlier accepted. Prawit, the only party-listed MP of the second largest opposition party who has admitted having taken leave from parliament many times has remarkably decided to not accept the salary and entitlement pay any longer and to return the whole sum of money which he has already accepted monthly from the House of Representatives since last year, confirmed Palang Pracharath secretary-general Paiboon Nititawan. Prawit will not only decline to accept the salary and entitlement pay throughout the current legislative term but until his MP status is legally terminated, Paiboon said. By Thai Newsroom Reporters TOP: Palang Pracharath leader Prawit Wongsuwan. Top photo: Thai Rath Full story: THAI NEWSROOM -- 2024-10-02 -
21
Trump's Pre-Election Strategy: Preparing to Challenge the 2024 Results
I guess it shows that he's not much of a man. In the TV series Veep, the press sec lost his campaign diary, and when asked what info was in it, he explained that they were telling so many lies that he had to write down the truth to remember what it was. For a real-life incident, a week or two ago Nikki Haley posed a public question to Vance regarding all the idiocy he's been spouting: "do you want to lose?" But another thing about strategy: it used to be that candidates wanted people to vote for them, they wanted to be liked just long enough for a person to pull the lever for them. But now, well, it's hard to express, so I'll give an example: Kari Lake, a MAGA hopeful who keeps loosing elections (because they are all stolen, of course) addressed a rally a few days prior to one of the elections and said "If you were a John McCain supporter GET OUT, I don't want you!" I don't get it, you want people to vote for you or are you recruiting for a cult? Same thing with DT, how is this tactic of insulting and threatening groups of people supposed to get him elected? (*note: McCain was a US senator from her state, who ran against Obama in 2008) -
1
Elon Musk: Trump as the ‘Only Way’ to Preserve U.S. Democracy, Says Billionaire
A true man of the people. -
237
Israel Hamas War the Widening Middle East Conflict
The Iranian response has happened. Biden may have his very own war as the US have come out 100% on israeli's side- not a smidgen of being an honest broker between the sides. US ships have joined israel against this attack. No calls that I heard from official US spokesmen calling for a ceasefire- I guess the hostages have been lost now. Looking at the vdo of the attack in israel seems loads of missiles got through Iron Dome. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/1/israel-says-iran-launches-missile-attack-warns-residents-to-shelter Iran says missiles fired at Israel in response to assassinations -
5
Armenian, Persian, and Arab women
I wouldn't expect to get very far with them unless you have Brad Pitt looks, or you're a centimillionaire. -
147
The Republican Freak Show
Ah yes, the both sides BS. You're definitely a 'centrist' if you are still trying to sell that nonsense when one side doesn't even want to have elections anymore. 🤣 -
56
Is Thailand Value for money
Yes. Definitely. I have a lovely home that I rent, for about 10% of what I would pay in California, I live very well on an income which is not huge, have access to great health care, at a tiny fraction of what it costs in the US, and do not have to put up with alot of the aggravation that I had to when I lived back there. It is a very personal choice. I have friends who seem to be dropping like flies. I could be dead next year. You just don't know. I am not extravagant, but I live very, very well. A nice house, a new car every few years, new motorbikes for my gal and I every few years, a great art collection, plenty of good wine in the wine cooler, a new 77" OLED TV, a world class home theatre, plenty of international travel, etc. For me, it is a great lifestyle, that I could only dream of in the US. Well worth the expense and very easy to justify. Life is way too short. In the US the prices and inflation are now mind blowing. The cheapest lunch we have found was $30 for two. That is 1,000 baht, anytime you want something basic. A bag of groceries is 3,000 baht. A friend of mine is looking for an apartment to move to in LA, and really small, simple places are 70,000 baht per month. Nice two bedrooms are closer to 100,000 baht. Decent homes start at 125,000 baht per month. The cost of nearly everything has gone up dramatically. Runaway inflation? I had my motorbike seat redone on a scooter. 400 baht. A friend of mine had similar work done in the US. $275. I recently had a guy come over and insulate my ceiling. I bought the insulation and paid him 2000 baht for labor. In the US? $500 and up. I recently had an electrician do some work on the house. Nearly a full day of work. Paid him 1000 baht. In the US? $500 and up. An oil change for my scooter costs me 200 baht, with Castrol oil. In the US? $75. When I travel here I stay in nice four star hotels in Bangkok. Usually 1800-2500 baht. In the US? $130 for a crappy motel. $200 and up for a nice room. I eat well here. In a smaller town you can get a three course meal for 150-250 baht. In the US? 2000 baht and up, plus tax and a nearly mandatory 15% tip. I visit the emergency room here to visit a specialist, and with x-rays I am out the door for 2000 baht, at a private hospital. In the US? $300-2000. An anecdote on this subject. A good friend of mine got in a bad motorcycle accident some time ago. He almost lost his leg. He got his first of 11 operations at Bangkok Hospital Samui. It costs him over a million baht. They wanted to do a second procedure. They quoted him 1,400,000 baht. He decided to transfer to Bangkok. He was quoted 460,000 baht for the same procedure, at a top private hospital there. The surgeon told him that he worked at a public hospital too, and could do the same operation there, for alot less money. He told him he would get him a quote. In the interim, my friend called a good friend of his, in San Diego, who is an orthopedic surgeon. Since my friend is a retired chiropractor, he knew all the terminology, and explained what he needed, and asked for the best price. His friend called him back the next day, and quoted him $960,000, with cash discounts! The local surgeon here got back to him, and told him he could do it for 46,000 baht. He transferred, and they did all the rest of his procedures. So, 1,400,000 at Bangkok Hospital, 460,000 at Vejthani Hospital, and 46,000 at the public hospital, with an excellent surgeon. VS. 31,000,000 baht in the US. Again, no complaints from this peanut gallery. Friends of mine, who are single, enjoy the company of a young, beautiful woman for a couple of hours, for 2500 baht. In the US? $800 an hour now for a beauty, with alot of attitude. I could go on and on, all day long. I live at a level here, that I would never be able to live at, in the US, in most of Europe, in Oz, or Canada. -
6
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Wednesday 2 October 2024
Thai woman missing in Bang Yai, Nonthaburi, last seen in taxi by Puntid Tantivangphaisal Photo courtesy of KhaoSod A Thai woman has been reported missing since September 28. She was last seen leaving her condominium near Westgate in the evening and has not been in contact with her family, friends, or workplace since. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1339592-thai-woman-missing-in-bang-yai-nonthaburi-last-seen-in-taxi/ -
0
Thai woman missing in Bang Yai, Nonthaburi, last seen in taxi
A Thai woman has been reported missing since September 28. She was last seen leaving her condominium near Westgate in the evening and has not been in contact with her family, friends, or workplace since. Her concerned friends and family have been unable to reach her as she was not carrying her mobile phone or any other communication devices at the time of her disappearance. A Facebook user, Thanita Na Lampang, posted a video clip seeking assistance in finding the missing woman, Pakamon Ongart. According to the post, Pakamon, approximately 30 years old, was last seen in a pink dress and carrying a brown and white shoulder bag. She was captured on CCTV taking a green and yellow taxi from the Bang Yai market area yesterday, September 30. “We are looking for a missing person. Our senior, Pakamon Ongart, went missing from her condominium near Westgate on the evening of September 28. She has not returned home to her parents, did not go to work, and has not contacted any friends. She was not carrying her mobile phone or any communication devices. Everyone is very worried. If anyone sees her, please let us know.” Further details provided in the post specify that Pakamon was seen getting into a green and yellow taxi from the Bang Yai market area. Pakamon’s friends, Thanita and King expressed their deep concern and urged anyone with information on Pakamon’s whereabouts to come forward, reported KhaoSod. “She was wearing a pink dress and carrying a brown and white shoulder bag when she was last seen. She took a green and yellow taxi from the Bang Yai market area. If anyone has any information, please provide any leads. Thank you very much.” Contact numbers 063-2056383 (Neet) and 084-1319632 (King) have been provided for anyone with information to reach out. by Puntid Tantivangphaisal Photo courtesy of KhaoSod Source: The Thaiger -- 2024-10-02 -
251
I Voted Today
I emailed my vote for Donald Trump. Harris and Biden make me want to puke. -
1
Elon Musk: Trump as the ‘Only Way’ to Preserve U.S. Democracy, Says Billionaire
Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk recently expressed his belief that the future of American democracy hinges on former President Donald Trump winning the upcoming election. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, took to the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to share his controversial perspective, emphasizing that Trump is essential for the nation’s democratic survival. "Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election," Musk declared. "Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!" Musk's comments center around a theory regarding immigration and voting patterns in the U.S. According to Musk, Democrats are hastening the naturalization process for undocumented immigrants to create a new voting bloc that would significantly favor their party in future elections. He suggested that this influx of new voters would tip the scales, leaving Republicans at a permanent disadvantage. Musk elaborated on this idea by stating, "Let me explain: if even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years." He highlighted the delicate balance in swing states, adding, "The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes. That means if the ‘Democratic’ Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!!" Musk's support for Trump extends to accusations against the current administration. He claimed that President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are strategically relocating asylum-seekers to key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Arizona. According to Musk, this is a deliberate effort to influence future elections in favor of the Democratic Party. The White House, along with the campaigns of Harris and Trump, has been contacted for responses to Musk’s statements. Immigration, an already contentious issue in American politics, has gained renewed prominence in the current campaign. Former President Trump has been particularly vocal about the subject, directing much of his ire toward Vice President Harris. Over the weekend, Trump intensified his criticism, calling for Harris to be impeached due to her handling of immigration policies. "Kamala’s Illegal Migrants. It’s the biggest crime story of our time. She should resign or be IMPEACHED!" Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. His rhetoric didn’t stop there. While speaking at a campaign rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, Trump accused Harris of enabling violence through her policies, stating, "Hundreds of people have been murdered because of her action at the border, and thousands more will follow in rapid succession. She should be impeached and prosecuted for her actions." Trump's criticisms came shortly after Harris made a visit to the southern U.S. border, a trip aimed at showcasing her stance on border security. While Harris has portrayed herself as tough on immigration, she has been critical of Trump’s approach to the issue, particularly his failure to pass a bipartisan border bill. During a rally in Nevada last month, Harris took direct aim at Trump, accusing him of talking tough but not following through. "But Donald Trump doesn’t want to fix this problem. He talks a big game about a lot of things," Harris told the crowd. "He talks a big game about border security, but he does not walk the walk." As the 2024 election draws closer, immigration is sure to remain a central issue, with both sides trading jabs over who is better equipped to handle the complex challenge. Musk’s public endorsement of Trump, coupled with his inflammatory claims, adds another layer of intrigue to an already heated political landscape. Based on a report from: The Hill 2024-10-02 -
0
Iran’s Strategic Influence: The “Axis of Resistance” Across the Middle East
Iran’s “axis of resistance” refers to a network of militia/terrorist groups and political factions throughout the Middle East that are supported by Tehran, primarily through its Revolutionary Guards and the elite Quds Force. This alliance allows Iran to project power in the region, targeting rival nations such as Israel and Saudi Arabia. While Hezbollah is the most prominent and well-armed of these groups, the axis stretches far beyond Lebanon, reaching into other countries across the Middle East. The Iranian government provides substantial financial and military support to these groups. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards funnel millions of dollars to arm and train various militia forces, ensuring that Tehran’s strategic interests are enforced. This support is not only aimed at countering Israeli influence but also at destabilizing Saudi Arabia and other rivals, cementing Iran’s foothold in the region. One of the key concerns for the international community is how Iran might respond to Israeli actions, particularly when Israeli forces recently attacked Hezbollah targets in Lebanon. The world watches as tensions between Israel and Iran-backed forces escalate, raising the potential for broader conflict. In Lebanon, Hezbollah has been a focal point of attention for Israel. The group, heavily armed and with a significant presence in southern Lebanon near the Israeli border, plays a crucial role in Iran's regional strategy. Its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, a powerful figure both politically and militarily, was killed in recent Israeli strikes in Beirut. Nasrallah’s death is a significant blow to Hezbollah and the broader axis of resistance. His influence extended far beyond Lebanon, making him a central figure in Iran’s efforts to counter Israeli influence in the region. Iran’s support also extends to Palestinian groups, particularly Hamas. Financial and military aid from Tehran has helped Hamas develop its capabilities, including the use of drones in its 7 October attack against Israel. Analysts argue that the sophistication of Hamas’s assault on Israel’s Iron Dome defense system is evidence of Iran’s backing. Despite this, there have been moments of tension between Hamas and Iran, particularly when Hamas supported anti-Assad protesters during Syria’s civil war. Iran momentarily withdrew support from the group at that time. In addition to Hamas, smaller factions like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) also receive backing from Tehran. Syria is another key battleground for Iran’s influence. The Iranian military, intelligence, and security services have been critical in bolstering the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Iran’s support isn’t limited to Assad’s forces but also extends to various pro-government militias, including the Fatemiyoun Brigade, the Baqir Brigade, the Zainebiyoun Brigade, and Quwat al Ridha. These militias are positioned to defend Assad’s government, ensuring that Iran maintains strategic influence should his regime ever be destabilized. In Yemen, Iran has employed the Houthi rebels as a proxy force to exert pressure on both Saudi Arabia and Israel. The Houthis, one of several groups vying for power in Yemen, have proven to be a disruptive force in the region. Professor Clarke noted that the Houthis are "prepared to make war on just about anybody," aligning with Iranian interests to keep them active in the ongoing conflict. Recently, the Houthis demonstrated their reach by firing a ballistic missile that struck central Israel in September. The missile’s debris fell near a train station and an open, unpopulated area, showcasing the threat posed by these Iran-backed forces. Iran’s “axis of resistance” continues to be a central element of its foreign policy, exerting influence and destabilizing rivals throughout the Middle East. As regional tensions rise, the actions of these groups, backed by Tehran, remain a focal point for both Israel and Saudi Arabia, as well as the international community. Based on a report from: Sky News 2024-10-02 -
0
Watch: Man Sparks Outrage by Smashing $4,000 Autographed Taylor Swift Guitar
Swifties are reeling after a video of a man smashing a $4,000 autographed Taylor Swift guitar went viral. The unnamed man stirred up controversy by destroying the guitar, signed by the 14-time Grammy winner, just moments after purchasing it. In the footage, which surfaced on Sunday, September 29, the white-haired man can be seen picking up the guitar before repeatedly smashing it with a hammer, sending shards of wood flying across the room. As the destruction unfolds, his laughter fills the air, seemingly delighted by the chaos he has caused. At one point, it appears he’s about to deliver a final, dramatic overhead smash before the host of the event steps in, taking the hammer away. Other comments were more critical of the man's behavior. One person sarcastically quipped, "What a normal, well-adjusted human." Another criticized the wastefulness of his act, noting, "Why didn't he give some of that cash to his poor neighbors who can't afford eggs and cereal. These are not serious people." While most fans were left bewildered, one commenter tried to look on the bright side, saying, "I hope the auction price went to a great cause!!!" The exact reason behind the man’s actions remains unclear, but some have speculated that the stunt could have been politically motivated. Earlier in September, Taylor Swift publicly endorsed Kamala Harris for president, and some believe this may have triggered the bizarre protest. "Yeah, this endorsement thing ain't working out too hot for Ms. @taylorswift13," one person remarked online. However, not everyone condemned the man’s actions, with some actually supporting him. One user stated, "I want to buy this guy a beer," while another boldly declared, "He's my hero." As of now, Taylor Swift has yet to comment on the viral video, leaving fans and critics alike to continue debating the motivations and implications behind the shocking act. Based on a report from: Newsweek 2024-10-02 -
0
Julian Assange: "I Pled Guilty to Journalism" in Bid for Freedom
In his first public address since being released from prison, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange declared that his freedom was not due to the justice system functioning as intended, but rather because he "pled guilty to journalism." Speaking at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France, Assange gave his testimony to the Parliamentary Assembly, discussing the effects of his detention and conviction on human rights. The assembly consists of representatives from 46 European nations, and his speech was given ahead of a broader debate on his case and its implications. Assange’s supporters, particularly advocates of press freedom, praised his efforts, arguing that his work was vital in exposing military abuses that might otherwise have gone unchecked. However, his critics took a starkly different view. They accused him of recklessly endangering national security and putting lives at risk, particularly those of individuals who had provided information to U.S. forces in the Middle East. Some argued that Assange’s actions had exceeded the boundaries of traditional journalism, turning him into a criminal rather than a whistleblower. Assange’s legal journey reached its conclusion in a U.S. district court on the Northern Mariana Islands, an American commonwealth in the Pacific. There, he pleaded guilty to charges under the Espionage Act, admitting to conspiring to unlawfully obtain and distribute classified national defense information. His sentence amounted to the time he had already spent behind bars while contesting extradition from the U.K. to the United States. The Council of Europe’s human rights committee took a strong stance on the issue, designating Assange as a political prisoner and issuing a draft resolution condemning the harsh treatment he endured. The committee expressed its deep concern about the wider implications of his case on press freedom and human rights, highlighting what they described as a chilling effect on investigative journalism. As the debate surrounding his actions and their consequences continues, Assange’s legacy remains polarizing. For some, he is a champion of transparency and accountability in government. For others, his methods posed an unacceptable risk to lives and national security. What is clear is that his case has ignited significant discussions about the role of journalism, freedom of information, and the ethical boundaries that should govern both. Based on a report from: ABC News 2024-10-02
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now