sirineou Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 McCain was right. These people are scum. Why would you say that, and why would seven of the usual suspects give you a like? There is a case for why Kissinger is a war criminal and why people would protest and demand his arrest. if you are interested what is you case for claiming that the people protesting against Kissinger are " scum" or do you simply suffer from Tourette Syndrome Let me see if I understand your post. You believe Dr. Kissinger is a war criminal and you posted a video interview with Christopher Hitchens, to prove your point. Hitchens when alive, described himself as a socialist and a Marxist. If that isn't enough to raise your eyebrows, he was anti-Zionist as well. The only people who could possibly agree with Hitchens view of Dr. Kissinger, being a war criminal, are like minded individuals with a distorted perception of reality. Your choice of videos to support your opinion, fell way short. If anything, it portrays Kissinger as the brilliant American statesmen he is. Calling Hitchens names that in your mind are derogatory, though I see nothing derogatory about Socialism , Marxism or Anti zionism does nothing to detract from Kissingers actions, Once again a case of shooting the messenger rather than the message .Hitchens in his interview and book laid out his case on why Kissinger is a war criminal, the interviewer challenged some of his assertions his challenges were easily defeated. Please explain how and where this video portrayed Kissinger as brilliant American statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggold Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Kissinger was a great politician. If he were not secretary of state during the Nixon era, I wonder what the state of the world would be today. It is very easy to just say he should be tried for crimes against humanity. But what of Nixon what of American foreign policy etc. Who should stand trial? Easy to forget History when it comes to lefty socialists shouting for revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggold Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 (edited) McCain was right. These people are scum. Why would you say that, and why would seven of the usual suspects give you a like? There is a case for why Kissinger is a war criminal and why people would protest and demand his arrest. if you are interested what is you case for claiming that the people protesting against Kissinger are " scum" or do you simply suffer from Tourette Syndrome Let me see if I understand your post. You believe Dr. Kissinger is a war criminal and you posted a video interview with Christopher Hitchens, to prove your point. Hitchens when alive, described himself as a socialist and a Marxist. If that isn't enough to raise your eyebrows, he was anti-Zionist as well. The only people who could possibly agree with Hitchens view of Dr. Kissinger, being a war criminal, are like minded individuals with a distorted perception of reality. Your choice of videos to support your opinion, fell way short. If anything, it portrays Kissinger as the brilliant American statesmen he is. Calling Hitchens names that in your mind are derogatory, though I see nothing derogatory about Socialism , Marxism or Anti zionism does nothing to detract from Kissingers actions, Once again a case of shooting the messenger rather than the message .Hitchens in his interview and book laid out his case on why Kissinger is a war criminal, the interviewer challenged some of his assertions his challenges were easily defeated. Please explain how and where this video portrayed Kissinger as brilliant American statement? If you watched the video, it is plain that the only reason Hitchens has picked on Kissinger is to try and somehow put US politics on trial. It is feeble to try and blame one person for what is American politics/foreign policy, You would have to put every President since then on trial also! Especially Reagan and Bush Jr. Reagan for negotiating the delayed release of American Hostages to win the election. And Bush Junior for electoral fraud, stealing the presidency. Edited February 1, 2015 by ggold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Kissinger was a great politician. If he were not secretary of state during the Nixon era, I wonder what the state of the world would be today. It is very easy to just say he should be tried for crimes against humanity. But what of Nixon what of American foreign policy etc. Who should stand trial? Easy to forget History when it comes to lefty socialists shouting for revenge. well, that one is easy the Vietnam war would had being over several years earlier,saving millions of lives Cambodia would not have being brought n to the conflict so no killing fields. The Vietnam memorial wall in Washington DC would be half it's size East Timor would not have being invaded by Indonesia General Rene Schneider would not have being murdered, Allende the democratically elected president of Chile would not have being murdered by Pinochet Chile would not have suffered 16 yeas of Pinochet. etc on the down side, Pepsi Cola would have lost it's market share in Chile and American copper companies would have lost their cheap copper source and would have had to pay market prices. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckd Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 ...and Code Pink would have had to burn their bras somewhere else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2fishin2 Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 40 years ago and you people are still arguing the war? What is wrong with you people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 If you watched the video, it is plain that the only reason Hitchens has picked on Kissinger is to try and somehow put US politics on trial. It is feeble to try and blame one person for what is American politics/foreign policy, You would have to put every President since then on trial also! Especially Reagan and Bush Jr. Reagan for negotiating the delayed release of American Hostages to win the election. And Bush Junior for electoral fraud, stealing the presidency. Firstly, this thread is about protesters being called scum, for protesting Kissinger's participation at the Congressional hearings and demanding his arrest for alleged war crimes. Do yo think they were "Scum" ? The video is presented as evidence that the protesters were right to protest his presence.there are other videos and articles that would have probably made a better case This is a link to a documentary titled "The Trials Of Henry Kissinger" if you are interested in the subject https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bFOhAAYfqk The fact that others might have committed similar or greater crimes does in no way absolve him from guilt, and would be a disastrous deference in any criminal proceeding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 40 years ago and you people are still arguing the war? What is wrong with you people? we are not arguing the war, we are arguing Kissinger s Guilt, and McCain's right to call protesters "Scum" what is wrong with you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2fishin2 Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 Oh there is much arguing about the war. Wars were fought entirely different back then. Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world. What is not excepted today was standard practice back then. And the right for McCain to call them scum is one of the benefits of being a US citizen and being allowed to freely speak our mind. Kissinger was and is a great man. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMNightRider Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 McCain was right. These people are scum. Why would you say that, and why would seven of the usual suspects give you a like? There is a case for why Kissinger is a war criminal and why people would protest and demand his arrest. if you are interested what is you case for claiming that the people protesting against Kissinger are " scum" or do you simply suffer from Tourette Syndrome Let me see if I understand your post. You believe Dr. Kissinger is a war criminal and you posted a video interview with Christopher Hitchens, to prove your point. Hitchens when alive, described himself as a socialist and a Marxist. If that isn't enough to raise your eyebrows, he was anti-Zionist as well. The only people who could possibly agree with Hitchens view of Dr. Kissinger, being a war criminal, are like minded individuals with a distorted perception of reality. Your choice of videos to support your opinion, fell way short. If anything, it portrays Kissinger as the brilliant American statesmen he is. Calling Hitchens names that in your mind are derogatory, though I see nothing derogatory about Socialism , Marxism or Anti zionism does nothing to detract from Kissingers actions, Once again a case of shooting the messenger rather than the message .Hitchens in his interview and book laid out his case on why Kissinger is a war criminal, the interviewer challenged some of his assertions his challenges were easily defeated. Please explain how and where this video portrayed Kissinger as brilliant American statement? I think you have me confused with another poster. I didn't call Hitchens names. Hitchens described himself as a socialist, Marxist, and anti-Zionist. You don't see anything wrong about "socialism, Marxism, and being anti-Zionist??" What??? You got to be kidding me. Where do you people come from? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Loptr Posted February 1, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 1, 2015 (edited) Oh there is much arguing about the war. Wars were fought entirely different back then. Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world. What is not excepted today was standard practice back then. And the right for McCain to call them scum is one of the benefits of being a US citizen and being allowed to freely speak our mind. Kissinger was and is a great man. How about the people having their freedom of speech denied by McCain? Oh, I see, it only applies when it benefits you... You also forgot to mention that the Vietnam war was started based on a lie... The Gulf of Tonkin incident never occurred... As admitted to by Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense at the time... http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/05/robert-s-mcnamara-and-the-real-tonkin-gulf-deception/ Just like Pearl Harbor could have been avoided as FDR had foreknowledge of the attack and refused to warn his commanders in Hawaii... http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/4740-pearl-harbor-hawaii-was-surprised-fdr-was-not Just like the crisis in Ukraine was started by the US destabilizing the duly elected government and replacing it with neo-nazis... http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37599.htm http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957 Anyone found those pesky WMD's In Iraq? It was a lie, imagine that... http://www.nationalreview.com/article/390725/biggest-lie-victor-davis-hanson Here are a couple freebies.... Senate Unanimously Passes 2013 NDAA; Power to Arrest Americans Remains http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/13829-senate-unanimously-passes-2013-ndaa-power-to-arrest-americans-remains Obama Renews NSA mandate to spy on every man, woman and child on the planet... http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/despite-obama-s-pledge-to-curb-it-nsa-mass-surveillance-wins-rubber-stamp-20140913 So keep on believing that your duly elected officials and bureaucrats are acting in your best interest... You thump your chest and think you know what is going on, while not having a bloody clue, then attack anyone that attempts to educate you... So go ahead and crack open a cold one, put your feet up and get ready for the big game in a little while... In the mean time, read my signature line because I believe it applies... Edited February 1, 2015 by Loptr 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post iReason Posted February 1, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 1, 2015 Oh there is much arguing about the war. Wars were fought entirely different back then. Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world. What is not excepted today was standard practice back then. And the right for McCain to call them scum is one of the benefits of being a US citizen and being allowed to freely speak our mind. Kissinger was and is a great man. "Wars were fought entirely different back then." I think you have no idea why wars are fought. "Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world." Oh, yes they are. *See point one above. "Kissinger was and is a great man." Ludicrous. “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger That's what Hank thinks of all you Rambos out there who think they were/are fighting for "freedom". 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirineou Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I think you have me confused with another poster. I didn't call Hitchens names. Hitchens described himself as a socialist, Marxist, and anti-Zionist. You don't see anything wrong about "socialism, Marxism, and being anti-Zionist??" What??? You got to be kidding me. Where do you people come from? I see nothing wrong with socialism, Marxism ans anti Zionism that would preclude someone with such alleged ideologies from making a case for Kissinger's war crimes guilt, any one could make such allegations regardless of their ideology what or who the messenger is, does not detract from the message Am I arguing with children? PS so far I see no one defending Kissinger s alleged crimes, all I see are people attacking the messenger. and one defending McCain's freedom of speech but not the protesters freedom of speech again , I am I arguing with children? McCain called the protesters "Scum" do you agree they were :Scum" and if so why? were the protesters wrong ,is Kissinger not a war criminal, and if so why? everything else, at least as far as this thread is concerned is nonsense . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iReason Posted February 1, 2015 Share Posted February 1, 2015 I think you have me confused with another poster. I didn't call Hitchens names. Hitchens described himself as a socialist, Marxist, and anti-Zionist. You don't see anything wrong about "socialism, Marxism, and being anti-Zionist??" What??? You got to be kidding me. Where do you people come from? I see nothing wrong with socialism, Marxism ans anti Zionism that would preclude someone with such alleged ideologies from making a case for Kissinger's war crimes guilt, any one could make such allegations regardless of their ideology what or who the messenger is, does not detract from the message Am I arguing with children? PS so far I see no one defending Kissinger s alleged crimes, all I see are people attacking the messenger. and one defending McCain's freedom of speech but not the protesters freedom of speech again , I am I arguing with children? McCain called the protesters "Scum" do you agree they were :Scum" and if so why? were the protesters wrong ,is Kissinger not a war criminal, and if so why? everything else, at least as far as this thread is concerned is nonsense . I'll take Door Number One for; Arguing With Children. It was a tough call, with another door being; Mental Midgets. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 2fishin2 Posted February 2, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 2, 2015 Oh there is much arguing about the war. Wars were fought entirely different back then. Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world. What is not excepted today was standard practice back then. And the right for McCain to call them scum is one of the benefits of being a US citizen and being allowed to freely speak our mind. Kissinger was and is a great man. "Wars were fought entirely different back then." I think you have no idea why wars are fought. "Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world." Oh, yes they are. *See point one above. "Kissinger was and is a great man." Ludicrous. “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger That's what Hank thinks of all you Rambos out there who think they were/are fighting for "freedom". Obvious you are not educated in the military.... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 40 years ago and you people are still arguing the war? What is wrong with you people? It's all they've really got... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMNightRider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I think you have me confused with another poster. I didn't call Hitchens names. Hitchens described himself as a socialist, Marxist, and anti-Zionist. You don't see anything wrong about "socialism, Marxism, and being anti-Zionist??" What??? You got to be kidding me. Where do you people come from? I see nothing wrong with socialism, Marxism ans anti Zionism that would preclude someone with such alleged ideologies from making a case for Kissinger's war crimes guilt, any one could make such allegations regardless of their ideology what or who the messenger is, does not detract from the message Am I arguing with children? PS so far I see no one defending Kissinger s alleged crimes, all I see are people attacking the messenger. and one defending McCain's freedom of speech but not the protesters freedom of speech again , I am I arguing with children? McCain called the protesters "Scum" do you agree they were :Scum" and if so why? were the protesters wrong ,is Kissinger not a war criminal, and if so why? everything else, at least as far as this thread is concerned is nonsense . I'll take Door Number One for; Arguing With Children. It was a tough call, with another door being; Mental Midgets. You didn't mention door number three being, socialist, Marxist, anti-Zionist, and other assorted scum bags. OMG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiSePuede419 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 This is the guy who couldn't remember how many houses his rich drug-dealer wife (beer distributor) bought for him? The same guy who thought that half-wit loser from Alaska was qualified to be VP? Shut up, Grandpa. Your pancakes at IHOP are getting cold... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiSePuede419 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Like the old saying goes, if you kill a few people you're a Murderer. But if you kill millions, you're a talk show Icon. http://www.globalresearch.ca/crimes-against-humanity-why-is-henry-kissinger-walking-around-free/5358322 Edited February 4, 2015 by SiSePuede419 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brling Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Here's McCain 'protesting Islamic terrorism'... But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 This is the guy who couldn't remember how many houses his rich drug-dealer wife (beer distributor) bought for him? The same guy who thought that half-wit loser from Alaska was qualified to be VP? Shut up, Grandpa. Your pancakes at IHOP are getting cold... 'Guess you like yours young & pretty (and I'm not talking about the pancakes you're eating), eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiSePuede419 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Here's McCain 'protesting Islamic terrorism'... But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama. Are you sure you're not a racist? Here's George W. Bush bowing to a Saudi prince (Saudis #1 Supporter of Terrorism for over 80 years) http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-bush-43-1.jpg?w=584 Here's Reagan bowing to a dog: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-reagan.jpg?w=584 Here's Einsenhower bowing to French president: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=584 Here's Nixon bowing to Emperor of Japan Hirohito: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=584 The only difference is these were White Republican presidents. You're a tool... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chuckd Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama. Are you sure you're not a racist? Here's George W. Bush bowing to a Saudi prince (Saudis #1 Supporter of Terrorism for over 80 years) http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-bush-43-1.jpg?w=584 Here's Reagan bowing to a dog: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-reagan.jpg?w=584 Here's Einsenhower bowing to French president: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=584 Here's Nixon bowing to Emperor of Japan Hirohito: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=584 The only difference is these were White Republican presidents. You're a tool... Talking about being a tool... 1. George Bush is lowering his head for the King of Saudi Arabia to award a medal to him. 2. Ronald Reagan is petting his dog. 3. Dwight Eisenhower is probably trying to figure out whether to spit in DeGaulle's outstretched hand or shake it. My guess is he shook it. 4.Richard Nixon is lowering his head to converse with the midget Emperor of Japan. But thanks for the laugh. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wat dee Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 40 years ago and you people are still arguing the war? What is wrong with you people? It's all they've really got... There are people who love to bring up shit that's 70+ years old.So 40 isn't that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiSePuede419 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama.Are you sure you're not a racist?Here's George W. Bush bowing to a Saudi prince (Saudis #1 Supporter of Terrorism for over 80 years) http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-bush-43-1.jpg?w=584 Here's Reagan bowing to a dog: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-reagan.jpg?w=584 Here's Einsenhower bowing to French president: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=584 Here's Nixon bowing to Emperor of Japan Hirohito: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=584 The only difference is these were White Republican presidents. You're a tool... Talking about being a tool... 1. George Bush is lowering his head for the King of Saudi Arabia to award a medal to him. 2. Ronald Reagan is petting his dog. 3. Dwight Eisenhower is probably trying to figure out whether to spit in DeGaulle's outstretched hand or shake it. My guess is he shook it. 4.Richard Nixon is lowering his head to converse with the midget Emperor of Japan. But thanks for the laugh. Laugh? What's so funny about bowing to give a medal to people who support terrorism? Not surprising you condone and support W. His family does bid'ness with the bin Laden family. In fact, Poppy was meeting with Osama's BROTHER in DC on 9/11. Reagan invited the Taliban into the White House. You support terrorists. That's not funny. That's pathetic. But not surprising. The Only moral value American CONservatives have is "It's OK if you are a Republican". Pure mindless political partisan ideology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chuckd Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama.Are you sure you're not a racist?Here's George W. Bush bowing to a Saudi prince (Saudis #1 Supporter of Terrorism for over 80 years) http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-bush-43-1.jpg?w=584 Here's Reagan bowing to a dog: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-reagan.jpg?w=584 Here's Einsenhower bowing to French president: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=584 Here's Nixon bowing to Emperor of Japan Hirohito: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=584 The only difference is these were White Republican presidents. You're a tool... Talking about being a tool... 1. George Bush is lowering his head for the King of Saudi Arabia to award a medal to him. 2. Ronald Reagan is petting his dog. 3. Dwight Eisenhower is probably trying to figure out whether to spit in DeGaulle's outstretched hand or shake it. My guess is he shook it. 4.Richard Nixon is lowering his head to converse with the midget Emperor of Japan. But thanks for the laugh. Laugh? What's so funny about bowing to give a medal to people who support terrorism? Not surprising you condone and support W. His family does bid'ness with the bin Laden family. In fact, Poppy was meeting with Osama's BROTHER in DC on 9/11. Reagan invited the Taliban into the White House. You support terrorists. That's not funny. That's pathetic. But not surprising. The Only moral value American CONservatives have is "It's OK if you are a Republican". Pure mindless political partisan ideology. Huh? Your nonsensical posts have just reached a new low. Think about this for a minute...take longer if your thought process requires it. Bush has lowered his head so King Abdullah can drape a medal of some sort around his neck. This is obviously confusing you so try and remember an awards ceremony at an Olympic games. The medal winning athletes are lowering their heads in order for the medals to be draped around their necks. You do know what the Olympic games are...right? Lots of folks did business with the Bin Laden family. They own one of the largest corporations in Saudi Arabia. Got a link to what Papa Bush was doing on 9/11/01? That was a dog Reagan was petting...not the Taliban. Some of them have similar haircuts though so your utter confusion is somewhat understandable. Not smart, but understandable. You missed the mark just a teensy bit on who I support...as did the rest of your mindless political ideological post. Cheers. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iReason Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Oh there is much arguing about the war. Wars were fought entirely different back then. Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world. What is not excepted today was standard practice back then. And the right for McCain to call them scum is one of the benefits of being a US citizen and being allowed to freely speak our mind. Kissinger was and is a great man. "Wars were fought entirely different back then." I think you have no idea why wars are fought. "Tactics not the same in todays technology advanced world." Oh, yes they are. *See point one above. "Kissinger was and is a great man." Ludicrous. “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger That's what Hank thinks of all you Rambos out there who think they were/are fighting for "freedom". Obvious you are not educated in the military.... Hell no. Who want's to be dumb, stupid and a pawn? In this: "If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population." Henry Kissinger And the marriage of Globalist Hank and his Monsanto buddies who, burned countless innocents alive with Agent Orange continues with GMO's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brling Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Here's McCain 'protesting Islamic terrorism'... But, he did not BOW and SLOBBER like the apologist Obama. Are you sure you're not a racist? Here's George W. Bush bowing to a Saudi prince (Saudis #1 Supporter of Terrorism for over 80 years) http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-bush-43-1.jpg?w=584 Here's Reagan bowing to a dog: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-reagan.jpg?w=584 Here's Einsenhower bowing to French president: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=584 Here's Nixon bowing to Emperor of Japan Hirohito: http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=584 The only difference is these were White Republican presidents. You're a tool... No it is you that is a TOOL. It has nothing to do with skin colour. Obama has bowed, grovelled, slobberd, for 6 years now, including 2 world apology tours. Wise up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brling Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 This is the guy who couldn't remember how many houses his rich drug-dealer wife (beer distributor) bought for him? The same guy who thought that half-wit loser from Alaska was qualified to be VP? Shut up, Grandpa. Your pancakes at IHOP are getting cold... So you will not be voting for grandma Clinton then ? She will be almost 70 in 2016, 1 year younger than when grandpa run for the White house. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now