Jump to content

PM wants world to accept the new Thai charter


webfact

Recommended Posts

NEW CONSTITUTION
PM wants world to accept the new charter

THE NATION

30257642-01_big.jpg

PM says he is not worried about Thai reaction but is unsure of international response

BANGKOK: -- THE NEW charter must be accepted by the international community, Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha said yesterday.


After the Cabinet meeting yesterday at Government House, Prayut said he was not worried about domestic acceptance of the new constitution, but then asked what if the international community rejects it.

"If they [international community] won't accept it [the new charter], they will claim that our country has no democracy, similar to what they think about Article 44 under the interim charter. We use it to benefit the country, but they accuse us of coercing [people on this]," Prayut said.

The PM said the government would invite legal specialists from Germany and France to share experiences about drafting their charters and how they manage after a coup. He spoke after a meeting of the five junta-appointed agencies.

"The NCPO has solved less than 30 per cent of the problems facing the country. We need the public to know how we can move forward and end divisions. We need public acceptance. That is why we need to look how foreign countries tackle their problems,'' Prayut said.

The PM also insisted the new charter is not drafted to benefit any political party in particular, saying the importance of the Constitution was to create a learning process for people both domestically and internationally on how the new charter is different from previous ones and for what reasons.

Meanwhile, Prayut cast doubt on people's level of understanding of the new constitution and democracy itself.

"I want people to ask how they could cooperate, but no one asks such questions. They only ask when there will be an election," the PM said.

Nonetheless, General Prayut put the question back to the public, saying there have been calls for an election as soon as possible but one must ask: "Does Thailand today need reforming? If not and you request an election to be held now - just tell me so I can take a rest."

He said the new constitution should focus on national reform to prevent corruption and have better checks and balances, since scrutiny to prevent people doing wrong was not clear.

Asked whether the government will help people understand the constitution and the process of how it came to its final draft, Prayut replied the government was still discussing this matter.

"Sometimes people do not understand this matter clearly, they only understand that democracy is having an election and give full freedom and authority to the people, but no-one asks for the people's role.

"I want people to question their duties on how they can cooperate with the government," he added.

The PM was also asked whether the government is considering holding a referendum on the new charter, but Prayut now was not the time to consider that issue.

Meanwhile, an official said the government was keeping to a schedule that includes an election in early 2016.

"We are committed to the road map where an election will happen after the new constitution is put in place," NCPO spokesman Colonel Winthai Suvari said.

He said the constitution was due to be completed later this year, but he refused to comment on statements by other officials that the junta could stay in power longer, if necessary.

That statement came after Prayut reportedly visited a famous astrologer, who said he should stay in power for three more years.

But Prayut has reportedly told the fortune-teller to stop predicting his future. He insisted that he will follow the road map to restore democracy and hold an election next year.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/PM-wants-world-to-accept-the-new-charter-30257642.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-04-08

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

"The new charter must be accepted by the international community"

If they don't accept it and tow the Junta's line, what are you going to do. Prayuth can't treat the International community like he treats the suppressed Thais. The international community are still allowed to think, analyse and form thier own opinions. The compulsory brainwashing and propoganda doesn't work and never will on the free.

They are? Where? LMAO The corporations own everyone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings...

Sure it's worrying about the power that article 44 allows, but that same power also allows for all of the red tape and bureaucracy to be side stepped in order to make meaningful changes in months rather than years or decades...

I look at many western countries and see that the road to 'meaningful democracy' was paved with Violent revolutions, civil wars, protests and uprisings.... And to be honest, if you asked me about a year ago, seemed this was the path that Thailand was heading as well.

So while I do not look through any rose tinted glasses and while I do look at article 44 with some trepidation and fear as to how it could be abused...

I also do have some amount of hope that it could allow for real changes in Thailand government and institutions that could greatly benefit Thai society and democracy in the long term.

So it will all come down to how things play out and how it is used, but personally I am willing to wait and see before I make any final judgements.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings...

Sure it's worrying about the power that article 44 allows, but that same power also allows for all of the red tape and bureaucracy to be side stepped in order to make meaningful changes in months rather than years or decades...

I look at many western countries and see that the road to 'meaningful democracy' was paved with Violent revolutions, civil wars, protests and uprisings.... And to be honest, if you asked me about a year ago, seemed this was the path that Thailand was heading as well.

So while I do not look through any rose tinted glasses and while I do look at article 44 with some trepidation and fear as to how it could be abused...

I also do have some amount of hope that it could allow for real changes in Thailand government and institutions that could greatly benefit Thai society and democracy in the long term.

So it will all come down to how things play out and how it is used, but personally I am willing to wait and see before I make any final judgements.

Spoken like a good little North Korean.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I want people to question their duties on how they can cooperate with the government,"

Ask not what your government can do for you, ask what you can do for your government...

Sorry JFK...

Ehem, Ehem... It is COUNTRY (Not Government). Ask not what your COUNTRY can do for you. That statement was devoid of political color as a Government - in the USA could either be Republican or Democrat).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Mr PM, the international community does not have to accept it, they may have to live around it however they don't "have to" accept it. Just as Thailand does not accept the findings of the international aviation body, until it became a big problem.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a minute, this is not taking the ASEAN party leaders political line of complaining bitterly about outsiders trying to get involved in internal affairs...in fact, it's the opposite. This Khun Pryuth could be on to something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...