Call for 'reforms before elections' forces a detour in PM's road map

[heybruce]

As I recall, your "facts" are typically off-topic quotes from years past, made in an attempt to divert attention from the topic at hand. Now you are attempting to divert a topic about reforms before elections by claiming to have facts you won't provide. Are these facts about reforms or elections? If so, please provide them.

I couldn't resist challenging you to provide the facts since I, and many others, would love to learn where the 7% figure that comes up in all your posts comes from. As expected, you've provided nothing.

Can't really grasp what I said hey? Do you understand what I said at least about the tourist numbers example or will you ignore that as well to try to look good in front of your peers? You know, the hotel room example? that one can't be rebutted so ignore that and try another approach hey.

I will try again.

I have shown graphs, facts, tourist statistics, links (not blogs or opinions) and all have been denounced with me being attacked and belittled followed with a rebuttal that "My mate stayed at a hotel and the room next door was empty so tourist numbers are down despite your facts"

If you don't know the 7% figure due to a lack of memory recall I pity you.

I could say the sky was blue, but if Jatuporn said it was green you would ague it.

I said the 2007 referendum was legitimate and your ilk stated it was a forced vote. I had facts to prove my case. Your ilk denounced them, threw in a little condescension against me and stated beliefs.

Welcome to the award that not many get.

Congrats.

Can't really grasp this one, can you?

"As I recall, your "facts" are typically off-topic quotes from years past, made in an attempt to divert attention from the topic at hand. Now you are attempting to divert a topic about reforms before elections by claiming to have facts you won't provide. Are these facts about reforms or elections? If so, please provide them."

My facts to support this claim are in your post above; what do your tourism numbers have to do with this topic about reforms and elections?

BTW, if I remember correctly your 7% number was some of the BS put out by the Thai Researchers in Community Happiness Association, a propaganda organization so obvious even the junta abandoned it. http://asiancorrespondent.com/126917/why-are-some-opinion-poll-results-so-positive-of-the-thai-junta/

If that is incorrect, please provide the correct source. Don't claim to have facts if you won't or can't provide them.

This is like dejavu!

Can't really grasp what I said hey? Do you understand what I said at least about the tourist numbers example or will you ignore that as well to try to look good in front of your peers? You know, the hotel room example? that one can't be rebutted so ignore that and try another approach hey.

I will try again.

I have shown graphs, facts, tourist statistics, links (not blogs or opinions) and all have been denounced with me being attacked and belittled followed with a rebuttal that "My mate stayed at a hotel and the room next door was empty so tourist numbers are down despite your facts"

If you don't know the 7% figure due to a lack of memory recall I pity you.

djjamie, read the title of the topic:

Call for 'reforms before elections' forces a detour in PM's road map

Got it? Nothing about tourism, rice subsidies, or your other other off-topic rants. I have asked you twice if your facts had anything to do with reforms and elections and invited you to provide these facts, and you have failed to provide any referenced facts about any subject.

I have ignored your hotel room example for two reasons; it has nothing to do with the topic, and you haven't told us where you came up with it. Can you provide a link to the topic discussion that you got it from, or did you pull it from a place you can't link to?

If you refuse to explain your 7% figure, nobody will believe it. I think that if you ever had a source for it, you've forgotten it or realize that your source, Thai Researchers in Community Happiness Association, has no credibility.

Edited June 22, 2015 by heybruce