Jump to content

Thousands of Syrians flee into Turkey amid intense fighting


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thousands of Syrians flee into Turkey amid intense fighting
By LEFTERIS PITARAKIS and BASSEM MROUE

AKCAKALE, Turkey (AP) — Thousands of Syrians cut through a border fence and crossed over into Turkey on Sunday, fleeing intense fighting in northern Syria between Kurdish fighters and jihadis.

The flow of refugees came as Syrian Kurdish fighters closed in on the outskirts of a strategic Islamic State-held town on the Turkish border, Kurdish officials and an activist group said, potentially cutting off a key supply line for the extremists' nearby de facto capital.

Taking Tal Abyad, some 80 kilometers (50 miles) north of the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa, would deprive the militant group of a direct route to bring in new foreign militants or supplies. The Kurdish advance, coming under the cover of intense U.S.-led coalition airstrikes in the area, would also link their two fronts and put even more pressure on Raqqa.

In this Turkish border village, the refugees took by surprise the Turkish troops stationed there, who were overwhelmed by the large number of people crowding the crossing. Thousands of people had been gathering for more than a day on the Syrian side of the Akcakale border crossing before they broke through Sunday afternoon.

People threw their belongings over the fence while others passed infants into Turkey over barbed wires before following through a several-meter wide opening in the border fence.

Turkish troops later brought in reinforcements and gathered up the refugees on the Turkish side of the border, preventing them from going deeper into Turkey.

Earlier Sunday, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmus speaking on the refugee situation at the crossing between in Tal Abyad and Akcakale, claimed that those refugees were not fleeing fighting between Kurds and the Islamic State group, but were rather trying to escape to Turkey in case their villages are hit by U.S.-led coalition bombings.

He said Turkey was providing humanitarian aid to them on the other side of the border while taking in anyone who is sick or injured. Kurtulmus said Turkey has taken in more than 2 million refugees since 2011.

"We are of the opinion that there isn't a humanitarian tragedy there," Kurtulmus told CNN-Turk television in an interview. "Our priority is for them to remain within their border. We will continue to provide humanitarian aid to them"

Hours after Kurtulmus spoke, Turkey reversed its decision and opened the border to allow more of the refugees in, the state-run Anadolu Agency reported. It said however that this time, Islamic State group militants at the border prevented them from crossing into Turkey.

It put the number of people who were waiting to cross at around 2,500. Around 13,400 Syrians have fled to Turkey since June 1, the agency said.

On Sunday, Kurdish official Idriss Naasan said that Islamic State fighters have fled from Suluk, a few kilometers (miles) southwest of Tal Abyad, and that Kurds now hold the town. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights also said Islamic State fighters had withdrawn. The Observatory said the Kurds are about 5 kilometers (3 miles) from Tal Abyad.

The Observatory reported later that Kurdish fighters captured more villages near Tal Abyad on Sunday adding that jihadis blew up to bridges southeast and southwest of the town to prevent them from pushing forward.

"It's only a matter of time before this area is liberated," Naasan told The Associated Press by telephone from northern Syria, saying the Kurds surround Tal Abyad from the east, west and south. The Turkish border — and the soldiers there — now hem the extremists in from the north.

However, Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Observatory, said Islamic State fighters still control the road linking the Turkish border with Raqqa.

Brett McGurk, the U.S. deputy special presidential envoy for the global coalition to counter the Islamic State group, told NBC's "Meet the Press" program on Sunday that Kurdish fighters and other units in Syria are scoring major territorial gains against the Islamic state group. Using an alternative acronym for the group, McGurk said the Kurdish fighters are "really giving a beating to ISIS and they're very close to cutting off the main supply route that ISIS has into its capital of Raqqa."

Since the beginning of May, members of the main Syrian Kurdish force, the People's Protection Units, or YPG, have taken more than 200 small Kurdish and Christian towns in northeastern Syria, as well as strategic mountains seized earlier by the Islamic State group.

They have pushed into Raqqa province, a stronghold of the Islamic State group. Along the way, they have picked up ammunition, weapons and vehicles left behind by the jihadis, almost mirroring the way the extremists overran Iraqi positions last year in their sweep across a third of that country.

The Islamic State group has declared areas of Syria and Iraq it holds as part of its self-declared caliphate, demanding the loyalty of the world's Muslims. Their gruesome propaganda videos of mass killings have drawn in foreign fighters, many coming in over the border from Turkey.

Even if the Kurds cut off Tal Abyad from Raqqa, the Islamic State group could bring in fighters across the border in Syria's Aleppo province, where they still hold ground. However, that would be an indirect route that could expose them to other fighting amid the long Syrian civil war against President Bashar Assad.

In Syria, a country now split mostly between Islamic militants and forces loyal to Assad, the U.S. has found a reliable partner in the YPG, the country's strongest Kurdish militia. They are moderate, mostly secular fighters, driven by revolutionary fervor and a desire to eventually have a nation of their own carved out in the region.

U.S. airstrikes continued Sunday in the area, as an Associated Press journalist on the Turkish side of the border from Tal Abyad saw one strike east of the town.

Nasser Haj Mansour, a defense official in Syria's Kurdish region, said YPG officials are coordinating with the U.S.-led coalition regarding a possible attack on Tal Abyad. He added that the aerial coverage prevented the Islamic State group from bringing reinforcements to the area.
___

Mroue reported from Beirut. Associated Press writer Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey contributed to this report.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-06-15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against

being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called

genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Don't be silly. UN is putting in a huge effort to assist the millions of Syrian & Iraqi refugees and where possible IDPs. UN is stymied in coming up with policy to address the conflict in the area due to veto votes in the Security Council. In any case it's the USA led coalition that has the main role is addressing the conflict, not the UN.

To mimic a quote from Stalin 'The UN! How many divisions have they got'

Edited by simple1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Don't be silly. UN is putting in a huge effort to assist the millions of Syrian & Iraqi refugees and where possible IDPs. UN is stymied in coming up with policy to address the conflict in the area due to veto votes in the Security Council. In any case it's the USA led coalition that has the main role is addressing the conflict, not the UN.

To mimic a quote from Stalin 'The UN! How many divisions have they got'

The Muslim states of the middle east should be the ones responsible for addressing these problems if they want to maintain the big porky pie that Islam is the reliion of peace.

Yet they have little desire to do so.

Al Jazera conducted a poll on its Arabic language website asking if you support ISIS and what they are doing in the middle east, the result was 83% support ISIS from a total of 87,000 polled. Give you some idea of how the religion of peace really has its morals.

I say international forces to fortifiy the border with Europe, stop all miugration out of the middle east and just let them destroy themselves and just maybe there will be peace. When they are all dead.

I have had enough of the lot of them, they bring trouble to every place they taint with their very presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Don't be silly. UN is putting in a huge effort to assist the millions of Syrian & Iraqi refugees and where possible IDPs. UN is stymied in coming up with policy to address the conflict in the area due to veto votes in the Security Council. In any case it's the USA led coalition that has the main role is addressing the conflict, not the UN.

To mimic a quote from Stalin 'The UN! How many divisions have they got'

The Muslim states of the middle east should be the ones responsible for addressing these problems if they want to maintain the big porky pie that Islam is the reliion of peace.

Yet they have little desire to do so.

Al Jazera conducted a poll on its Arabic language website asking if you support ISIS and what they are doing in the middle east, the result was 83% support ISIS from a total of 87,000 polled. Give you some idea of how the religion of peace really has its morals.

I say international forces to fortifiy the border with Europe, stop all miugration out of the middle east and just let them destroy themselves and just maybe there will be peace. When they are all dead.

I have had enough of the lot of them, they bring trouble to every place they taint with their very presence.

If there was no invasion of Iraq and no western support of terrorists that wanted to fight against Assad then there would be no ISIS. Edited by BKKBobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Don't be silly. UN is putting in a huge effort to assist the millions of Syrian & Iraqi refugees and where possible IDPs. UN is stymied in coming up with policy to address the conflict in the area due to veto votes in the Security Council. In any case it's the USA led coalition that has the main role is addressing the conflict, not the UN.

To mimic a quote from Stalin 'The UN! How many divisions have they got'

The Muslim states of the middle east should be the ones responsible for addressing these problems if they want to maintain the big porky pie that Islam is the reliion of peace.

Yet they have little desire to do so.

Al Jazera conducted a poll on its Arabic language website asking if you support ISIS and what they are doing in the middle east, the result was 83% support ISIS from a total of 87,000 polled. Give you some idea of how the religion of peace really has its morals.

I say international forces to fortifiy the border with Europe, stop all miugration out of the middle east and just let them destroy themselves and just maybe there will be peace. When they are all dead.

I have had enough of the lot of them, they bring trouble to every place they taint with their very presence.

If there was no invasion of Iraq and no western support of terrorists that wanted to fight against Assad then there would be no ISIS.

I agree.

But a look at the past 1200 years of the history of this death cult called Islam and everyone can see that their agenda of world domination of islam in it purest and most brutal form has never gone away. So it would have been only a matter of time before there would have been another rising up and attempt at domination.

Even without the helping hand of the USA in creating both Al Qaida and ISIS in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief that will be more British package holidays ruined by people staring into restaurant windows while they are trying to dine.

Oh the humanity!

Just wait to the end of the month when they will be out numbered by refugees from Greece fleeing poverty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turkey needs to get its priorities right. One would wonder if they are in support of ISIS as it seems they are more concerned with the Kurds than ISIS as their neighbors. Specifically this item among many:-



"Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan reiterated his assessment that Kurdish groups were taking over areas evacuated by Arabs and Turkmen, saying that might eventually threaten Turkey's borders.


While dealing a blow to Islamic State, seizing Tel Abyad would help the YPG to link up Kurdish-controlled areas of northern Syria. Turkey is worried about the risk of separatist sentiment among its own Kurdish minority in the southwest. (Reuters)



Link to comment
Share on other sites

And pleasing to see that the Kurds (all be it with American air strike support) are the one group who are prepared to get in there and deal to ISIS. The YPG (men and women and the odd falang) have been gradually cleaning this scum from Syria for the past 6 months or so. Perhaps a Middle East dominated by the Kurds would bring a more settled region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello fat cats people of the UN, while you're buy condemning Israel for protecting it self against being wiped out for the face of the earth, there is this little issue over at Syria and Iraq called genocide, where millions of people are loosing everything, including their lives...

Another round of espresso and croissants any one?

Don't be silly. UN is putting in a huge effort to assist the millions of Syrian & Iraqi refugees and where possible IDPs. UN is stymied in coming up with policy to address the conflict in the area due to veto votes in the Security Council. In any case it's the USA led coalition that has the main role is addressing the conflict, not the UN.

To mimic a quote from Stalin 'The UN! How many divisions have they got'

The Muslim states of the middle east should be the ones responsible for addressing these problems if they want to maintain the big porky pie that Islam is the reliion of peace.

Yet they have little desire to do so.

Al Jazera conducted a poll on its Arabic language website asking if you support ISIS and what they are doing in the middle east, the result was 83% support ISIS from a total of 87,000 polled. Give you some idea of how the religion of peace really has its morals.

I say international forces to fortifiy the border with Europe, stop all miugration out of the middle east and just let them destroy themselves and just maybe there will be peace. When they are all dead.

I have had enough of the lot of them, they bring trouble to every place they taint with their very presence.

I am fairly sure the US/NATO does not want the Sunni Arab states occupying and governing reconquered territory that DAESH curently holds. On the opposite side most Western states don't want Iran to get heavily involved in fighting DAESH. The Syrian and Iraqi Kurds have had some successes, will the Muslim majority countries in the region let them retain & govern territory recaptured from DAESH or indeed even grant them autonomy.. Then of course is the question of what happens if the Assad regime falls with the flow on sub group vicious civil that will likely occur. No easy answers to realpolitik and balance of power objectives.

The Al-Jazeera poll survey was of Sunnis & referencing the successful operations by DAESH in capturing Shiite held territory. If the poll was do you support DAESH invading & governing your home country, I suggest the level of support would be minimal.

Supporting Muslim on Muslim genocide that's your call, but not exactly a position most would concur. Oops... maybe the majority right wingers on TV would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...