NRC to consider national strategic plan designation on Monday

[Lite Beer]

NRC to consider national strategic plan designation on Monday

BANGKOK, 20 June 2015 (NNT) – The National Reform Council (NLA) is set to scrutinize a report regarding the National Strategy Act in a meeting that will determine the long-term development plan of the nation on 23 June 2015.

NRC President Tienchai Kirananda has called a meeting for the consideration of a report from the Administration Reform Commission on the national strategic plan and the draft National Strategy Act. The meeting will be held on 23 June 2015.

The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. The National Strategy Act will be the driving mechanism for the establishment of a national organizations.

These national organizations organized in this scope must reflect the needs of the nation and the public, and should be independent from all political allegiance.

The guidelines according to this report can be carried out without the having to wait for the new constitution coming into effect. These guidelines will have to be approved by the NRC, the Cabinet and the National Legislative Assembly before being officially enforced.

The Constitution Drafting Committee was requested to include this national strategic plan this matter into the fundamental state policy sector of the constitution to ensure all governments to follow this designated strategic plan.

-- NNT 2015-06-20

[JOC]

>>The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. << Quote

And should there be any hick-ups along the way, of course the NLA, NRC and Prayut are "forced" to stay on in order to save the nation..............

Those guys make Robert Mugabe look like an amateur !!

[phoenixdoglover]

I would rather Thailand had a clear view of the next 2 years.

Sure, a 20 year plan would be wonderful. But considering the past 20 years, the prognosis for actually executing a 20 year plan is poor.

That would require political stability.

So keep it simple:

Strategy 1 - fundamentally change the reporting relationship and accountability of the Thai military to be in the control of and answerable to the civilian government.

Strategy 2 - Replace the current system of primary education with organization, methods, and objectives modeled after the leading countries in Asia according to international rankings of educational achievement.

Strategy 3 - Decentralize regional and local police functions into autonomous units and reduce the scope and size of the Royal Thai Police by at least 75%, retaining a focus on royal security, border policing, major national and transnational crimes, and investigation of other police units.

Strategy 4 - Ensure the integrity of the courts by reinforcing the three-level system, and eliminate all nonessential court functions at the Supreme Court level, redirecting all criminal matters to the trial courts. Maintain the Supreme Court as a court of appeals and constitutional adjudication only.

Strategy 5 - Establish free speech protections for the people and the press that are second to none.

Strategy 6 - Establish a 21st century national elections system that is able to organize, execute and monitor speedy, free and fair elections.

Strategy 7 - Establish a comprehensive National Statistics capability, with a mandate for the census, surveys, and reliable, scheduled reporting of statistics across all functions of government, education and the economy.

Strategy 8 - Plan and execute an environmental restoration program, with clear 5-year goals for habitats, air, water, wastewater, solid waste, hazardous waste and other areas of concern.

Strategy 9 - Modernize farming across all major agricultural sectors.

Strategy 10 - Take strong action to break up monopolies, and provide significant assistance, in the form of educational grants, training, startup assistance, and advisory services, to small and medium businesses.

[djjamie]

>>The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. << Quote

And should there be any hick-ups along the way, of course the NLA, NRC and Prayut are "forced" to stay on in order to save the nation..............

Those guys make Robert Mugabe look like an amateur !!

Again not making sense. I pulled up another not 5 minutes ago for stating nonsense.

Mugabe was an elected PM for 33 years. Prayut wasn't.

Mugabe decimated the countries economy and was charged with human rights abuses. Prayut wasn't?

Mugabe purported to be democratic while killing opposition supporters. Prayut didn't?

Seems like Mugabe is more aligned to thaksins ilk than Prayut, but then don't let facts get in the way of your quant fairy tale!

[JOC]

>>The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. << Quote

And should there be any hick-ups along the way, of course the NLA, NRC and Prayut are "forced" to stay on in order to save the nation..............

Those guys make Robert Mugabe look like an amateur !!

Again not making sense. I pulled up another not 5 minutes ago for stating nonsense.

Mugabe was an elected PM for 33 years. Prayut wasn't.

No Prayut is a coup-maker, who "elected" himself.

Mugabe decimated the countries economy and was charged with human rights abuses. Prayut wasn't?

Thailands economy is going down the drain, and Prayut has already granted himself amnesty for all wrongdoings.

Mugabe purported to be democratic while killing opposition supporters. Prayut didn't?

.Prayut is "not against democracy, but people are still "invited" to army camps and/or charged with LM.

Seems like Mugabe is more aligned to thaksins ilk than Prayut, but then don't let facts get in the way of your quant fairy tale!

So you see the two outstanding leaders have a lot in common, plus they are both equally paranoid about the dangerous 7% !!

[FangFerang]

"These national organizations organized in this scope must reflect the needs of the nation and the public, and should be independent from all political allegiance." Well, there goes the power of the vote altogether.

Why not just skip all the posturing, appoint the entire government, and let everyone go back to 1977? The shortcut would save billions of baht, and most people probably would not even complain. As long as the West and East can have an interest, as long as the rice and rubber keep coming, the West and East will posture complaints while spending money and everyone gains.

Well, except the disenfranchised landless people they kicked off public forest and the farmers, who are all deliberately uneducated. On second thought, they would be happy too, if they get some subsidies and deeds they can sell to the loan sharks. And if they are not happy, the new Charter gives them no way to protest in Bangkok, so everything is still fine.

Good job!

[djjamie]

>>The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. << Quote

And should there be any hick-ups along the way, of course the NLA, NRC and Prayut are "forced" to stay on in order to save the nation..............

Those guys make Robert Mugabe look like an amateur !!

Again not making sense. I pulled up another not 5 minutes ago for stating nonsense.

Mugabe was an elected PM for 33 years. Prayut wasn't.

No Prayut is a coup-maker, who "elected" himself.

Mugabe decimated the countries economy and was charged with human rights abuses. Prayut wasn't?

Thailands economy is going down the drain, and Prayut has already granted himself amnesty for all wrongdoings.

Mugabe purported to be democratic while killing opposition supporters. Prayut didn't?

.Prayut is "not against democracy, but people are still "invited" to army camps and/or charged with LM.

Seems like Mugabe is more aligned to thaksins ilk than Prayut, but then don't let facts get in the way of your quant fairy tale!

So you see the two outstanding leaders have a lot in common, plus they are both equally paranoid about the dangerous 7% !!

So to reiterate;

Mugabe was not a coup maker who elected himself. Yet you compare him to Prayut.

Terrorism does not foster a strong economy as shown by the economy rebounding after the 22nd of May, 2014. That aside Australia's economy is not looking good so we can compare that to Mugabe too?

Prayut is not against democracy...Agreed there.

[jesimps]

>>The national strategy will prioritize on the improvement of national development and administration, towards a prosperous and secure nation. The scope of national development under the "long term" vision would be a time frame of no less than 20 years. << Quote

And should there be any hick-ups along the way, of course the NLA, NRC and Prayut are "forced" to stay on in order to save the nation..............

Those guys make Robert Mugabe look like an amateur !!

Again not making sense. I pulled up another not 5 minutes ago for stating nonsense.

Mugabe was an elected PM for 33 years. Prayut wasn't.

No Prayut is a coup-maker, who "elected" himself.

Mugabe decimated the countries economy and was charged with human rights abuses. Prayut wasn't?

Thailands economy is going down the drain, and Prayut has already granted himself amnesty for all wrongdoings.

Mugabe purported to be democratic while killing opposition supporters. Prayut didn't?

.Prayut is "not against democracy, but people are still "invited" to army camps and/or charged with LM.

Seems like Mugabe is more aligned to thaksins ilk than Prayut, but then don't let facts get in the way of your quant fairy tale!

So you see the two outstanding leaders have a lot in common, plus they are both equally paranoid about the dangerous 7% !!

So to reiterate;

Mugabe was not a coup maker who elected himself. Yet you compare him to Prayut.

Terrorism does not foster a strong economy as shown by the economy rebounding after the 22nd of May, 2014. That aside Australia's economy is not looking good so we can compare that to Mugabe too?

Prayut is not against democracy...Agreed there.

Me no understand. How can a coup maker NOT be against democracy?

[jerojero]

Nation plan.... Strategy.... Will do.....future..... Blah blah blah! Why not report actions that have proven positive results!