Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

EC’s secretary-general sacked

34711-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Election Commission today resolved by four votes against one to sack Mr Puchong Nutrawong as the secretary-general of the Office of the Election Commission with immediate effect.

Mr Thanit Sriprathet, an expert of the EC’s Office, said that Mr Puchong had failed the commission’s performance assessment and several projects under his supervision were delayed.

The EC, in the meantime, appointed Mr Bunyakiat Rakchartcharoen, the most senior deputy secretary-general to become the acting secretary-general replacing Mr Puchong pending the appointment of a new secretary-general.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/ecs-secretary-general-sacked

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-12-09

Posted
EC’s secretary-general sacked

Sacked to make crystal-sure there will never ever dever-lever be any election-collection... wai2.gifwai2.gifwai2.gif

Posted

Either he deserved it or tried to do a good job. Difficult to say when this is Thailand. coffee1.gif

Agree 100%. They all should be shown the door. Maybe he is the sacrificial lamb?

Posted

Was a general election one of the delayed projects? Hardly his fault that!

Methinks they had a GENERAL election some months back.

The General decided one man, one vote. HIS.

Posted

Either he deserved it or tried to do a good job. Difficult to say when this is Thailand. coffee1.gif

Agree 100%. They all should be shown the door. Maybe he is the sacrificial lamb?

Hopeless.

Posted

Just one member sacked?

The whole EC should have been sacked first after it failed to hold elections with 60 days of parliament being dissolved in October 2013 in accordance with the Constitution.

Secondly, the whole EC should have been sacked in the February 2, 2014 national election when it failed to provide alternate voting venues for 10% of voters in nine provinces or about 2 million voters who were prevented by the PDRC from voting. That failure became the leading cause for the Constitutional Court to invalidate the entire election by 22.5 million voters.

Posted

Just one member sacked?

The whole EC should have been sacked first after it failed to hold elections with 60 days of parliament being dissolved in October 2013 in accordance with the Constitution.

Secondly, the whole EC should have been sacked in the February 2, 2014 national election when it failed to provide alternate voting venues for 10% of voters in nine provinces or about 2 million voters who were prevented by the PDRC from voting. That failure became the leading cause for the Constitutional Court to invalidate the entire election by 22.5 million voters.

In all fairness they did have other things to attend to, eg the observer trip to Scotland for the referendum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 23

      Thailand Live Tuesday 20 May 2025

    2. 0

      Warehouse Raid Uncovers Over 50 Million Baht in Fake Branded Goods in Samut Sakhon

    3. 2

      Kamala Harris Crossroads Weighing the Governorship of California Against Her National Future

    4. 23

      Thailand Live Tuesday 20 May 2025

    5. 0

      Nakhon Ratchasima: Nephew Kills Uncle in Domestic Dispute

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...