Jump to content

PM Prayut: Economic challenge the biggest test for govt


webfact

Recommended Posts

GOVT'S PERFORMANCE
PM: Economic challenge the biggest test for govt

WASAMON AUDJARINT
THE NATION

30275483-01_big.jpg?1450814943265
Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha joins a traditional Thai dance, Kratua Tang Sua, at Government House yesterday. The Culture Ministry brought the dance team to do a demonstration for the premier, who called for the dance and other cultural plays

Survey shows mainly favourable views of NCPO but academic questions representative sample

BANGKOK: -- PRIME Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha announced yesterday that the government had won high marks for overall performance except in the area of economic management.


The latest nationwide survey by the National Statistical Office revealed that 99 per cent of respondents were satisfied with the government's overall performance.

The three top performances for the respondents were prices of lotteries, public welfare and drug suppression.

However, the premier said only 40 per cent of respondents were satisfied when it came to their economic well-being.

Prayut further admitted that that the majority of people are worried about the Kingdom's sluggish economy.

The macro-economic environment has not improved, not only for Thailand but also for some other Asean countries.

Prayut said the Thai economic indicators had improved when compared to those of other Asean countries.

The government will today hold a press conference on its performance over the past year.

Regarding the public's low rating for economic management, Prayut said the government would accelerate key measures to improve the situation and the people's wellbeing.

The survey was conducted from November 27 to December 4, with 7,200 respondents.

The results were presented at yesterday's Cabinet's meeting.

Details of the survey show that people were most satisfied with how the government has maintained order and security in society.

Prayut said he personally was not satisfied with the government's work. "I will be content once all of our work is done and I hand it off to the next government."

According to government spokesmen, the survey covered people aged between 18 and 60 years old, with an average monthly income of Bt10,001 to Bt30,000 per household, and an average education below undergraduate level.

The survey also represents voices from local communities.

In terms of government policies, 98 per cent of respondents were happy with the lottery-price control policy, while almost 97 per cent were satisfied with the anti-drug policy and more than 92 per cent approved of the anti-corruption policy.

About 92 per cent of respondents approved of social welfare policies and 92 per cent also approved of the government's social order management.

The survey also asked people to choose which policies they were most satisfied with.

Some 81 per cent of respondents chose the lottery-price control policy, more than 69 per cent liked policies relating to social welfare, 64 per cent were satisfied with policies to protect national resources, 55 per cent liked anti-drug policies and 55 per cent favoured anti-corruption policies.

Asked what new state policies were most urgent, 53 per cent of respondents said it should control the cost of living, more than 35 per cent favoured agricultural product price improvements, 29 per cent chose drugs and narcotics control, and more than 25 per cent said debt-related issues.

More than 98 per cent of people trusted the government to solve problems at a national level, a government source said.

Meanwhile, Thammasat University political lecturer Attasit Pankaew said the survey reflected people's opinions on specific topics such as the lottery-price control rather than highlighting other issues such as corruption.

"This is in contrast to the government's priority to combat against graft," Attasit said. "It could be also that the Rajbhakti Park scandal was emerging during the time."

The results could also reflect how people in that income bracket prioritised issues, Attasit said, adding that results could differ if collected from middle-income respondents. For instance, the survey respondents did not put corruption as a top priority, according to the poll.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/PM-Economic-challenge-the-biggest-test-for-govt-30275483.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-12-23

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So, while 99% satisfied with "overall" performance, when it came to the question of economic well-being, the rating plunges to 40%.

Talk about creative reporting.

But, that's not all! We are also informed that the economic indicators had improved (when compared to other ASEAN countries). Presumably comparing Thailand to Cambodia, Laos, and Burma.

While where on the subject of "rubbery figures", elsewhere the number of respondents was reported as being 2,700! Just a small thing, but if the 7,200 is wrong then perhaps other numbers are also questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The three top performances for the respondents were prices of lotteries, public welfare and drug suppression."

Essentially low hanging political fruit. Nothing is mentioned with regard to the worst performers that might interest Thai people such as human rights and liberties, reform of justice, reform of the agricultural indusrty, national energy security and protection of the people's sovereignty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The three top performances for the respondents were prices of lotteries, public welfare and drug suppression."

Essentially low hanging political fruit. Nothing is mentioned with regard to the worst performers that might interest Thai people such as human rights and liberties, reform of justice, reform of the agricultural indusrty, national energy security and protection of the people's sovereignty.

Unfortunately with items like 'slavery', 'fishing industry' and so being condemned for decades without subsequent government doing much more than saying "we are listening and in the process of blablabla", one might get the impression that the Thai public has different priorities.

The farmers are being told to readjust and stop relying on government handouts. Seems a good approach, better than what the previous government did with massive handouts. National Energy security being handled. Protection of peoples sovereignty, being handled as border clashes seem to have minimised.

Anything else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...