.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
182
Which cooking oil to use?
You body needs fat, though most could do with a little less saturated fat. Why if not wanting flavor of the oil (EVOO, Coconut or Sesame) we use Canola. -
13
The '50-50 Race' Pre-Election Polls Were Phony
Same in 2016, when had clinton winning right up to the end, when she lost om a landslide of EC votes. Why MSM and polls are a joke -
-
37
Denver's nut job mayor to head the resistance.
After all it is only a handful of apartment complexes controlled by violent Venezuelan gangs in the Denver area. -
30
What Is the Best Way to Fly?
???????????????? Fly an airline that has screens that tilt so you can see it when they put the seat back down. No problem on THAI. Back when I was flying Saudia ( the worst major airline on the planet in the 90s ) so few would fly on it that I often got the 4 seats in the center to lie on. I never found 2 seats enough to sleep properly. Saudia in the 90s didn't have individual screens ( Emirates did then ), and the movies were so censored not worth watching, so sleeping was all that was left. -
0
BBC Staff Divided Over Call to Wear Palestinian Flag Colors and Keffiyeh
A workplace initiative urging BBC staff to wear the colors of the Palestinian flag and keffiyehs in solidarity with Palestine has sparked division and raised concerns, particularly among Jewish employees. Organized by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) as part of a broader "workplace day of action" for Palestine, the event aims to advocate for a ceasefire, the cessation of violence in Gaza, and the release of hostages. Scheduled for Thursday, the TUC has encouraged participants to visibly demonstrate their support by wearing red, green, black, or the traditional Palestinian keffiyeh. The National Union of Journalists (NUJ), which represents many BBC staff, endorsed the event, sharing the call to action with its members. The NUJ also condemned Israeli military actions, stating that since October 7, 2023, at least 135 Palestinian journalists have been killed. "The NUJ is urging branches and chapels to show support on the day and amplify the union’s calls," it said. However, the initiative has drawn backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC, who worry that visible displays of solidarity with Palestine could jeopardize the broadcaster's impartiality and alienate colleagues. One BBC journalist expressed frustration, describing the action as "hypocritical and antisemitic" and criticizing it for encouraging behavior that might contravene the organization’s impartiality standards. “BBC journalists, who pride themselves on impartiality and who fought to keep their NUJ free of politics, are being encouraged to break the BBC’s editorial guidelines by supporting a political cause,” the journalist said. Charlotte Henry, a freelance journalist and creator of *The Addition*, a media and tech newsletter, announced she had left the NUJ over its stance. “It has become a hostile environment for Jews, and I can no longer be a part of that,” she stated. The controversy underscores the tension between advocacy and impartiality within the BBC, where employees are expected to adhere strictly to neutrality guidelines. The Trades Union Congress, which represents 5.5 million members across various sectors, has been criticized by some Jewish organizations for its perceived insensitivity toward Jewish workers. The Board of Deputies of British Jews issued a statement condemning the TUC’s approach. "It is time for these unions to decide, are they there to support workers or to play student politics on a conflict on whose facts they appear to be plainly ignorant," it read. The Board also warned that introducing such issues into workplaces risks exacerbating tensions for Jewish employees. “Whatever the stated intent, attempts to bring this issue into the workplace in such a fashion will undoubtedly add to the belligerent atmosphere which many Jewish staff have been facing.” This debate highlights the challenges of navigating political activism in professional environments, particularly in institutions like the BBC, where impartiality is a core principle. As the day of action approaches, the division among staff serves as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in balancing advocacy, solidarity, and neutrality. Based on a report by The Times 2024-11-28 -
0
Kamala Harris' Post-Election Video Goes Viral
A recent video of Vice President Kamala Harris addressing supporters following her 2024 presidential election defeat has gained significant attention online, sparking a range of reactions. The clip, posted by the Democratic Party's account on X (formerly Twitter), showcases Harris thanking donors and delivering a motivational message. However, it has also drawn criticism and skepticism over its presentation and content. The 28-second video, released on Tuesday, features Harris urging her audience to stay resilient despite the election outcome. “I just have to remind you: Don’t you ever let anybody take your power from you. You have the same power that you did before November 5, and you have the same purpose that you did. And you have the same ability to engage and inspire, so don’t ever let anybody or any circumstance take your power from you,” Harris said during the call. Even political scientist Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, added to the discourse, offering a single word in response to the Democrats’ post: “um.” As the clip continues to circulate, it has sparked discussions about political messaging, presentation, and public perception. Newsweek reportedly reached out to Harris' campaign for comment but had not received a response at the time of reporting. This video, while intended as a moment of gratitude and inspiration, highlights the heightened scrutiny political figures face in the age of social media, where every gesture is dissected and amplified for millions to judge. Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-11-28 -
0
Australia Urged to Rethink ICC Membership Amid Controversial Arrest Warrants
A leading Australian legal expert has called for the nation to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC), claiming the institution is failing to uphold the principles of justice it was designed to protect. This call comes in the wake of the ICC’s contentious decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, accusing them of crimes against humanity and war crimes during the Gaza conflict ignited by Hamas’ October 7 attacks. Professor Greg Rose from Wollongong University has raised significant concerns about the court’s actions, suggesting that its recent decisions undermine the rule of law and compromise its credibility on the global stage. Speaking to Sky News Australia’s Chris Kenny, Rose stated, “It’s my firm belief that the court is undermining the rule of law, the integrity of the United Nations, and the court’s credibility. In fact, it’s shot, and the best thing that Australia could do would be to pull out.” Rose’s critique focuses heavily on jurisdictional overreach, pointing out that Israel is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the ICC. This, he argues, means the court lacks the authority to prosecute Israeli leaders. “The fact that the ICC brought a case against Israel despite it not being bound by the court shows it has exceeded its own jurisdiction,” Rose said. Additionally, Rose criticized the ICC for failing to adhere to principles of due process and procedural fairness enshrined in its statute. He highlighted the court’s disregard for findings by an independent delegation of military experts, which deemed Israel’s domestic investigations adequate. “The court is meant to defer to the domestic processes of the country alleged to have committed the crimes,” he explained. “And then we also have breaches of procedural fairness with the inversion of the burden of proof.” Rose was particularly scathing about the ICC’s evidentiary approach. “The way the court has formulated its issue of warrants requires Israel to prove innocence. It requires Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant to demonstrate that they had no criminal intention… rather than the court finding on the evidence that they had a criminal intention,” he said, adding, “In fact, the court’s substantive judgment is two pages. And it’s really a sad joke.” The involvement of one of the three judges, who had previously worked on prosecuting the case, further fueled accusations of bias. Rose noted, “Normally, if you have a judge working on a case [as a prosecutor] and then going to judge it… that would be needed to give a reasonable apprehension of bias.” Rose’s remarks align with recent statements from Australian political figures. Shadow Attorney General Michaelia Cash hinted at the possibility of a future Coalition government reassessing Australia’s relationship with the ICC. Speaking on Sky News Australia’s Sunday Agenda, she stated, “Given the actions of the ICC, we certainly do have grounds now to reconsider our membership of the organisation.” This renewed scrutiny of the ICC raises questions about its role and relevance in international law, with Australia potentially at a crossroads regarding its continued participation in the court. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-28
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
.thumb.jpg.3ee24d9400fb02605ea21bc13b1bf901.jpg)
Recommended Posts