Squeegee Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Curious that the "Hang 'em High" crew is conspicuously silent. Although, if you pay attention to the "users reading this topic" at the bottom of every page, (at least when I have checked in), I have noticed a key proponent who has been lurking silent, for hours. Oh, and Squeegee? It is "a lot more serious than putting their picture on selected websites." And your properties... Sorry, I'm not following you. My properties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iReason Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 (edited) ^^^^ Read your Signature. As in; a lot more serious/important than... Edited January 15, 2016 by iReason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickJ Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Maybe they should leak the names of those not guilty of any wrongdoings as well...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageurreotype Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Most Thai govt websites are non-functional and/or non-interactional, often just glorified Facebook pages. Thailand is not an online society in terms of govt-to-population interface. The effect of this hack protest will be limited. Whilst this is true (almost all government/police departments here use Facebook), those having had their personal details exposed will be none too pleased. As another poster pointed out, a hack showing 'unusual wealth' would have them peeing their pants "But he assured that the hacking only blocked outsiders from visiting the websites while internal systems linking the Office of the Court of Justice and internal organisations continued to operate." This is a shot across their bows. The next step will be to hit their internal facing services, and then they'll've had it. They're going to get a lot more where that came from and the humiliation will just increase and increase as they've got zero way of knowing what to do. I wonder when they say they've done this from abroad if that's true or they've just given the impression that that's what's happened? It strikes me that you could do this from here across the road from the server and they'd be none the wiser and then you could rub this in their faces as well. I think the hackers will exploit any weaknesses and will know that the culture here is based on lying on lying on lying, and the respondents' pretending not to notice, pretending not to notice and pretending not to notice. As soon as you're out of that vacuum, the whole thing becomes an unrepairable disaster. I've just returned from my local public prosecutor's office. And having spoken (again) with head honcho, today's experience has, yet again, confirmed my view , their entire judicial system is 'an irreparable disaster'. They are, without doubt, THE most ridiculous (in the true sense of the word), people I've ever met. And, the way things are going (backwards fast), it'll never change here. Ever. Without a functioning judicial system, any country is doomed to Turd World status. They're all nice though .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaiChai Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 (edited) What worries me is the wrong people will be caught. Edited January 15, 2016 by MaiChai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestro Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Removed an incomer post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 What worries me is the wrong people will be caught. If the try stitching foreigners up for this one, they will need something more credible than a couple of Burmese bumpkins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeegee Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) ^^^^ Read your Signature. As in; a lot more serious/important than... Ah, ok. Sorry, I didn't see your reply 'til just now. As it goes, that's a junta-groupie quote meant to be ironic (or something). I suppose if people think I think like that I should probably credit it as such. Edited January 17, 2016 by Squeegee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now