webfact Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Hillary Clinton: I don't know if the US is ready for a female presidentBy Rob Crilly, New YorkDemocratic candidate says she is a better campaigner than when she lost to Barack Obama but that she still faces a struggle to persuade voters that a woman can do the top jobNEW YORK: -- Hillary Clinton believes she is a better candidate than her 2008 version but still wonders whether the US is ready for a female president.In a lengthy interview with Vogue, accompanied by a glamorous Mario Testino photoshoot, she discusses her fears of getting sick on the campaign trail, life as a woman in the corridors of power and how she once wanted to be an astronaut.Asked directly whether the recent failure of a woman to become the mayor of New York meant that the US was not ready for a female president, she sighed in answer.Full story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/12162379/Hillary-Clinton-I-dont-know-if-the-US-is-ready-for-a-female-president.html-- The Telegraph 2016-02-18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtRock Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Was that a veiled attempt at getting excuses in early ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses G. Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humberstone Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Well Hilary Clinton is neither a criminal or a pathological liar (BTW - suggest you look the term up), so by your reckoning she's fit for President. In my opinion the fact that she's a 'Clinton' counts against her more than her gender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses G. Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Hillary violated numerous laws with her own personal bathroom server and classified emails. She lied about that and about Benghazi being caused by a spontaneous demonstration. If she is not indicted for these things, it proves that the same laws don't apply to everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryp Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Yes they are BUT NOT YOU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. A criminal? What exactly has she been convicted of? Must be tough for you teabaggers to face eight years with a female president after eight years with a black guy in the WH.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Vote for me or you're all a bunch of redneck misogynists. Forget about my corruption and being a pathological liar, these are merely feminine foibles, which you will come to love in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovelomsak Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Yes they are BUT NOT YOU You beat me too it. I was going to say.They are ready for a female president just not you Hilary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpyoldman Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Right ! Because America can only handle male presidents who are criminals and liars (GW Bush & Trump). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckd Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Right ! Because America can only handle male presidents who are criminals and liars (GW Bush & Trump). To borrow and paraphrase a well worn out Hillary chant... What have George Bush and Trump been convicted of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rancid Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 The US is more than ready for a female president, what it doesn't need is another sociopath puppet like Hilary. There again that is likely what they are going to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rancid Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. A criminal? What exactly has she been convicted of? Must be tough for you teabaggers to face eight years with a female president after eight years with a black guy in the WH.. What did John Corzine get convicted of? Stole billions and got away with it, Wall St bankers? There are different laws for different folks you know. Being convicted means nothing, the elite rarely ever get convicted of anything unless its an internal squabble. Doesn't mean though that the evidence isn't overwhelming and that they should have been convicted. Bush should be in jail as a war criminal but spends his billions freely in comfort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBrainer Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Take a look at what's recently happened to Germany with a woman at the helm. If that is anything to go by, then by all means get Hillary in there ASAP. 555 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mamypoko Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready...minus angry, older, White, conservative, theistic, "things were better when I was a kid"-type voters. Anyway...GO BERNIE!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Well Hilary Clinton is neither a criminal or a pathological liar (BTW - suggest you look the term up), so by your reckoning she's fit for President. In my opinion the fact that she's a 'Clinton' counts against her more than her gender. If you don't know that HRC is a liar, you haven't being paying attention. She now obviously expects to not be elected, so when it happens she can blame the voters for not voting for her. Had she been a better campaigner 8 years ago, she would have won, and I'd have been cheering for her. What a difference a few years make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humberstone Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Well Hilary Clinton is neither a criminal or a pathological liar (BTW - suggest you look the term up), so by your reckoning she's fit for President. In my opinion the fact that she's a 'Clinton' counts against her more than her gender. If you don't know that HRC is a liar, you haven't being paying attention. She now obviously expects to not be elected, so when it happens she can blame the voters for not voting for her. Had she been a better campaigner 8 years ago, she would have won, and I'd have been cheering for her. What a difference a few years make. There's a huge difference between telling a few fibs and being a pathological liar. That was my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtsabai Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president, and I hope that it isn't Hillary. Bernie is the only candidate running that speaks truth to the power, the only one that has stayed the course. And unlike the Republican buffoon car, not batshit crazy. Hillary is a neocon/neoliberal tool of Wall Street criminals and banksters that will do/say anything to get elected and then like Obama screw the people that expected her to make a difference. Can the right wing drop Benghazi after millions of USD wasted on absolutely nothing? Perhaps if they hadn't forced cuts in the State Dept. defense budget there would have been enough personnel to repel the attack, but oh no that couldn't possibly be it, at least not in their pointy little heads. There are plenty of real reasons to attack Hillary, damn find one. For those of you that like war, from your comfortable armchairs, hang on, Hillary gets in there will be plenty, gotta' keep the big money folks happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 America is ready for a woman president who is not a criminal and pathological liar. Well Hilary Clinton is neither a criminal or a pathological liar (BTW - suggest you look the term up), so by your reckoning she's fit for President. In my opinion the fact that she's a 'Clinton' counts against her more than her gender. If you don't know that HRC is a liar, you haven't being paying attention. She now obviously expects to not be elected, so when it happens she can blame the voters for not voting for her. Had she been a better campaigner 8 years ago, she would have won, and I'd have been cheering for her. What a difference a few years make. There's a huge difference between telling a few fibs and being a pathological liar. That was my point. While I concede she may not be pathological, telling the world that she landed under fire somewhere, when she obviously did not insults the men and women that really do face enemy fire, and is very much more than a harmless fib. A fib is like when I tell my beloved that the phone battery was flat when I forgot to call her, not saying that there was no classified government materiel on a private, illegal server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckd Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. You would never agree but the name Condoleeza Rice comes to my mind as one that is more qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. In YOUR opinion. Unfortunately, she has a record that proves she is a liar, and allows ambassadors to die, even when they ask for extra protection before the event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keemapoot Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. I think Hilary's main problem has always been her transparent blind ambition from the very beginning. She cleverly used her position as first lady as a springboard to Senate and from there on. If you track her background it goes even further back. She has always been a calculating Cruella de Vil, and though I don't agree with most of the silly hysteria from the right making much ado about little with her actions on emails etc., her main issue it seems to me is sincerity. I view her, and I believe many do, as insincere, uncaring, selfish and power hungry. I think that will do her in no matter how qualified she is. By the way, I think she would be very qualified to be Pres. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. You would never agree but the name Condoleeza Rice comes to my mind as one that is more qualified. I'd rather Hanoi Hannah was elected US president before that woman got a foot in the door again. Even HRC would be preferable and that's something I'd never want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Anyone who wants to be president wants to be president. It's not a normal thing to want. Yes, she's more obvious than others, but so what? I actually think she has an appealing political philosophy of public service but I don't think she's done a great job communicating it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keemapoot Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Anyone who wants to be president wants to be president. It's not a normal thing to want. Yes, she's more obvious than others, but so what? I actually think she has an appealing political philosophy of public service but I don't think she's done a great job communicating it. Yes, she has crafted a good public service platform, but I feel it's only self-serving, just as her forgiveness of Bill's transgressions were. What she lacks is charisma. Of course, it's unfair to compare her to her husband, one of the great charismatic Presidents, but charisma is not only comprised of being a charmer, but convincing people you truly care about them above all else. Bill was great at it. Hilary is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUTHERNSTAR Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 I see the POTUS election is heating up among our US TV members. Good luck with your choice because heads you lose tails you lose. The only problem I have is that you have run out of true leaders (not owned by someone) that can avoid the coming world war/new cold war and as puppets of Wall street will lead the world down a dead end (pun intended) for the sake of financial gains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djlest Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 LOL i guarantee 99% of every ones Thai GF are also pathological liars, they just too good for you to know it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 She is the most qualified woman in the USA to be president. So if she loses, sorry, she has a point. No she doesn't. She's playing the vote for me or your prejudice card. I thought the election was about that persons political views and their ability to lead the country? No about their color, ethnicity, sex. religious views or sexual preference? Ethics, honor, transparency and honesty ought to be in there somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 We sure are...as long as that female is named Elizabeth Warren. She would make an excellent VP for the time being. No Rush- or Beck-crazed wacko would try and take out President Bernie with her waiting in the wings. Hillary is definitely the only sane and qualified GOP candidate of either gender, but a woman running you down with a bus hurts no less than when a man is doing the driving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now