Protesters block main road to Trump rally in Arizona

[wabothai]

The ulterative to Trump seems to be thug,fascist,violent and speech policing people. Who would most people rather have?

none of the above, simple

[Chicog]

I love how Trump protects the 1st Amendment. He really leads by example.

Donald Trump's campaign requires volunteers to sign a contract that forbids them from criticizing the Republican presidential front-runner, his family members, any Trump businesses or products, or his campaign. The six-page contract, reviewed in full by the Daily Dot, theoretically lasts for the entirety of a volunteer's life.

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/donald-trump-volunteer-contract-nda-non-disparagement-clause/

[lovelomsak]

These protesters are not very American in my eyes.Gives good arquement to what Trump says,things like a wall etc. In the land of the free violence to get your way seems to really be on the increase. I quess it is the right to be civil disobeient,I am sure they can find a civil rights lawyer would say that. I know I will be bashed for this but are these white guys that are doing these criminal acts or others?.Just curious.

The "violence to get your way" is not a racial thing...

Never aid it was so why attack me?

[mopar71]

These protesters are not very American in my eyes.Gives good arquement to what Trump says,things like a wall etc. In the land of the free violence to get your way seems to really be on the increase. I quess it is the right to be civil disobeient,I am sure they can find a civil rights lawyer would say that. I know I will be bashed for this but are these white guys that are doing these criminal acts or others?.Just curious.

The "violence to get your way" is not a racial thing...

Never aid it was so why attack me?

Sorry, wasn't meant as an attack on you. Merely showing that all this violence we see today is mostly done by one side of the political spectrum.

[Neurath]

Protesters should be treated as protesters. Not liked but tolerated by some, liked and encouraged by others. Violent protesters should be treated as violent persons interrupting the filming of The Apprentice or any other - what do they call them? - Reality TV show. Using violence or behaving violently when interrupting these events is useless, counterproductive and, yes, quite antithetical to the democratic spirit that animates both their organizers and their participants. Shame on them. Entrenching and energizing the current polarization with violence is the road to perdition and disaster.

100% guaranteed that if protesters showed up to shut down Bernie or Hillary from speaking the media would NOT be talking about how they are exercising their right to free speech and the media would NOT legitimize them by calling them "protesters".

Jolly good. Donald Trump should be able to have his rallies without violent interruption and protestation. Those violently trying to stop him speaking to his supporters and minions should be stopped from doing so by the institutions of the state. I imagine that you are right in thinking that should people showing support for a Trumpish platform try violently to interrupt a Clinton or Sanders rally there would be knashing of the teeth from all corners of the media. But how tiring it is to keep up with those who are inclined to be offended at all and anything and those who are so ready to call 'but they did it first' or 'if they did it, it would be different'. Schoolyard licks for schoolyard twits. The infantalization of our processes and institutions marches in step with our stoked fears, faux righteousness and they did it first toddler tantrums. The ship has left port and there is not going back now. What a sad undoing of a once great republic.

[arjunadawn]

Wow these stories from the USA sound just like when the redshirts would not allow yellow shirt politicians to rally or deliver speeches in the North to try and gain votes.

For all those that think it ok to block Trump from attending a perfectly legal gathering and that the protestors should not face any prosecution then clearly the US are respecting the protestors constitutional rights a lot more than the protestors are respecting the constitutional rights of Trump. The Irony.

The same organizing parties are now knee deep in the US election- Open Society, Tides Foundation, Soros money, etc. They brought you the Arab Spring, Red Shirts, Lavender revolution, crimson, color... etc. Look for the "fist" and a "color" to emerge.

There are genuine people who oppose Trump. There are genuine democrats who support others more than they oppose Trump. In the mix now are also paid and professionally trained agitators.

[chuckd]

@Post #15

Oh, look!

A T.V. show

"Months after initially making the claim that undocumented immigrants were beheading people in the Arizona desert, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer ® has finally admitted that she was wrong."

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/05/117461/brewer-admits-wrong/

Believe it...

Your source of information certainly explains your posts.

"

• Think Progress: This Internet blog "pushes back, daily," by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform "progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world."

From:

ORGANIZATIONS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS AND HIS OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

[stevenl]

@Post #15

Oh, look!

A T.V. show

"Months after initially making the claim that undocumented immigrants were beheading people in the Arizona desert, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer ® has finally admitted that she was wrong."

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/05/117461/brewer-admits-wrong/

Believe it...

Your source of information certainly explains your posts.

"

• Think Progress: This Internet blog "pushes back, daily," by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform "progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world."

From:

ORGANIZATIONS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS AND HIS OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

So it's not true, she has not yet admitted the be headings didn't happen?

[CWMcMurray]

Seems clear to me that the person who has the most to gain from these protests is Trump himself. "Why not," says some clever bell-end in his campaign staff, "block the roads with some paid volunteers we can rustle up. Get all the people angry....tell the media these awful people are out to stifle free speech...worth a few more votes...let's give it a try."

Don't let this right-whinger propaganda take hold my friend. What it's doing is showing the country how divisive Trump is. Everyone is dead dog tired of bipartisanship.

On the Gone Old Party side, chaos headed by the Pompadour Pompous Dufus himself, snide snickering and childish name calling during the debates. On the otherside Hilary, as cool as the underside of a pillow, she and Bernie actually debated policies and the direction of the nation.

No these protests are making the GOP look bad, real bad, and don't forget the aftertaste of the GW Bush disaster of a presidency is still in people's mouths.

Super Tuesday cartoon.jpg

So he's a bad guy because he mocks and calls people names ...

So you and all those who hate him .. mock him and call him names...

But that's ok cause it's only bad if others do it... Perfectly ok for you and those you agree with to do it

[Ulic]

"Protesters criminals block main road to Trump rally in Arizona."

Yes, but the locals knew how to get around roadblocks and Trump had a big rally with about 20,000 people there. It went just fine.

Then in the afternoon he had another in Tucson, Arizona with another good crowd. No real problems.

Cheers.

Oh there is a real problem. This pic is the Republicans biggest problem. When pathetic racist Sheriff Joe Arpaio endorses and is brought onstage to speak to your minions, there is a problem.

Trump is a racist xenophobic air-head buffoon. People should be protesting his every move. Trump is a stain on America.

I will agree with you on airhead buffoon but I really do not believe he is a racist xenophobe.

He employs visible minorities, he marries foreign women. His record speaks for itself.

[chuckd]

@Post #15

Oh, look!

A T.V. show

"Months after initially making the claim that undocumented immigrants were beheading people in the Arizona desert, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer ® has finally admitted that she was wrong."

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/05/117461/brewer-admits-wrong/

Believe it...

Your source of information certainly explains your posts.

"

• Think Progress: This Internet blog "pushes back, daily," by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform "progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world."

From:

ORGANIZATIONS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS AND HIS OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

So it's not true, she has not yet admitted the be headings didn't happen?

Perhaps you can explain what something the Governor of Arizona said in 2010 has to do with protesters blocking roads in Arizona in 2016.

I never claimed she didn't make the statements. I commented on the source of information explaining his posts.

You know, liberal, far left wing rhetoric.

[connda]

"Protesters criminals block main road to Trump rally in Arizona."

Yes, but the locals knew how to get around roadblocks and Trump had a big rally with about 20,000 people there. It went just fine.

Then in the afternoon he had another in Tucson, Arizona with another good crowd. No real problems.

Cheers.

Oh there is a real problem. This pic is the Republicans biggest problem. When pathetic racist Sheriff Joe Arpaio endorses and is brought onstage to speak to your minions, there is a problem.

Trump is a racist xenophobic air-head buffoon. People should be protesting his every move. Trump is a stain on America.

Or maybe just simply let the people of America vote for their next president?

Trouble is, everyone knows, if this goes to the RNC conventions, what 'the people' want will be ignored. It will be 'what the RNC establishment' want. And that will create a huge problem for voters who already feel disenfranchised.

[chuckd]

Seems clear to me that the person who has the most to gain from these protests is Trump himself. "Why not," says some clever bell-end in his campaign staff, "block the roads with some paid volunteers we can rustle up. Get all the people angry....tell the media these awful people are out to stifle free speech...worth a few more votes...let's give it a try."

Don't let this right-whinger propaganda take hold my friend. What it's doing is showing the country how divisive Trump is. Everyone is dead dog tired of bipartisanship.

On the Gone Old Party side, chaos headed by the Pompadour Pompous Dufus himself, snide snickering and childish name calling during the debates. On the otherside Hilary, as cool as the underside of a pillow, she and Bernie actually debated policies and the direction of the nation.

No these protests are making the GOP look bad, real bad, and don't forget the aftertaste of the GW Bush disaster of a presidency is still in people's mouths.

Super Tuesday cartoon.jpg

So he's a bad guy because he mocks and calls people names ...

So you and all those who hate him .. mock him and call him names...

But that's ok cause it's only bad if others do it... Perfectly ok for you and those you agree with to do it

Good call.

" Pompadour Pompous Dufus himself, snide snickering and childish name calling"

​Now that's an adult response if I have ever seen one.

[slipperylobster]

Had to laugh.

These antagonistic buffoon protests are only making borderline Trumpeteers more steadfast in their support. Nobody is attacking these people (perhaps two out of countless thousands)

If you look at the ones in New York, you see basically the fringe elements of society. Barely legal immigrants, and lazy people that are afraid that Trump will make them work for a check.

Go Trump (fist pump). Put the jobs back and take these people off foodstamps and welfare. Make the thugs work. Tell Mexico to take all their illegals back and have them build a wall they cannot climb. Get the right papers.....just like the rest of us have to do, when we go abroad.

dimwits.

<deleted> is a barely legal immigrant? Is that like a new one? Anyway, I like the term Trumpeteers, but prefer to think of them as Rusty Trumboners.

Barely legal Immigrants would include those that are pregnant in Mexico and deliver babies in the USA. Mom and dad get to stay. Another barely legal one is when illegal aliens go to a city that is declared a "Sanctuary". Federal government cannot deport them (oftentimes). Another is when they turn themselves in, but fail to meet the requirements to stay...but are awaiting court decisions.

a few examples. Barely legal. There are many more...

[sgtsabai]

Anyone care to provide the information about "paid and professionally trained agitators". It can't be done because it isn't true, unless it is on the right wing side perhaps. And no, bratbart etc. doesn't count as legitimate information. Nobody in their correct mind believes any of the trash spewed out of those types of propaganda. Go demonstrators. Every single one of you right wingers condemning the protests would be jumping up and down with joy if it were stupid teabaggers doing it at a Bernie or Hillary rally. Hell you probably cheered when the government organized and coordinated a nation wide destruction of OWS. Trump is nothing but a proto-fascist and a con man. I see he is conning a few ah people on tv. Sorry guys, as bad as the Republicans and the super rich right wing has made America, it isn't going back to the "Gilded Age" or the days of slavery.

[slipperylobster]

Stopping traffic is and protesting on a public highway without permits is unlawful.

These protesters basically broke the law.

They do have right to legal assembly...and protest...but not on a frigging highway.

I thought everyone would understand that is not allowed. If a permit was issued, then arrangements for traffic flow would of been made.

They are a bunch of uneducated morons just trying to incite anger...and possible try to present themselves as dummy targets for trump supporters. Hoping to irritate them enough to get punched in the face...causing negative publicity.

They have this overwhelming fear that Trump is winning...and will go to any extremes to stop him. Even denying his supporters the right to have a campaign rally. That is just stooooooopid

[stevenl]

@Post #15

Oh, look!

A T.V. show

"Months after initially making the claim that undocumented immigrants were beheading people in the Arizona desert, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer ® has finally admitted that she was wrong."

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/05/117461/brewer-admits-wrong/

Believe it...

Your source of information certainly explains your posts.

"

• Think Progress: This Internet blog "pushes back, daily," by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform "progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world."

From:

ORGANIZATIONS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS AND HIS OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

So it's not true, she has not yet admitted the be headings didn't happen?

Perhaps you can explain what something the Governor of Arizona said in 2010 has to do with protesters blocking roads in Arizona in 2016.

I never claimed she didn't make the statements. I commented on the source of information explaining his posts.

You know, liberal, far left wing rhetoric.

And I say the source doesn't matter with proven facts, to left, right and center.

[connda]

Seems clear to me that the person who has the most to gain from these protests is Trump himself. "Why not," says some clever bell-end in his campaign staff, "block the roads with some paid volunteers we can rustle up. Get all the people angry....tell the media these awful people are out to stifle free speech...worth a few more votes...let's give it a try."

Don't let this right-whinger propaganda take hold my friend. What it's doing is showing the country how divisive Trump is. Everyone is dead dog tired of bipartisanship.

On the Gone Old Party side, chaos headed by the Pompadour Pompous Dufus himself, snide snickering and childish name calling during the debates. On the otherside Hilary, as cool as the underside of a pillow, she and Bernie actually debated policies and the direction of the nation.

No these protests are making the GOP look bad, real bad, and don't forget the aftertaste of the GW Bush disaster of a presidency is still in people's mouths.

Super Tuesday cartoon.jpg

right-whinger?

Whinger isn't a term used in the US. It's used in Australia. Leave US politics to US citizens, and we'll leave Aussie politics to Aussies.

[connda]

These protesters are not very American in my eyes.Gives good arquement to what Trump says,things like a wall etc. In the land of the free violence to get your way seems to really be on the increase. I quess it is the right to be civil disobeient,I am sure they can find a civil rights lawyer would say that. I know I will be bashed for this but are these white guys that are doing these criminal acts or others?.Just curious.

The "violence to get your way" is not a racial thing...

Nice map, but probably bogus. Source it yourself. No reason to add disinformation into an already heated debate. Well, imho.

[connda]

I love how Trump protects the 1st Amendment. He really leads by example.

Donald Trump's campaign requires volunteers to sign a contract that forbids them from criticizing the Republican presidential front-runner, his family members, any Trump businesses or products, or his campaign. The six-page contract, reviewed in full by the Daily Dot, theoretically lasts for the entirety of a volunteer's life.

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/donald-trump-volunteer-contract-nda-non-disparagement-clause/

Damning if true. That wouldn't sit well with a large segment of voters, whom might otherwise, toss their hats in his corner. Wait and see. This is pretty new. Snope it in a couple of days. If it's disinformation, then more fuel has just been tossed on the fire for Trump.

[iReason]

Former Arizona Governor and ardant supporter of Donald Trump, Jan Brewer:

(Nice crowd Trump keeps. This one is nuttier than Palin. If that's possible)

“Brewer is saying she made another flub—mistakenly claiming that violence along the U.S. border has resulted beheaded bodies turning up in the desert.”

"That was an error, if I said that," the Republican told The Associated Press on Friday. "I misspoke."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/jan-brewer-gop-governor-arizona-sb1070-supporter-wrong-headless-bodies-claim-article-1.207244

"I misspoke, but you know, let me be clear, I am concerned about the border region,

because it continues to be reported in Mexico that there's a lot of violence going on and we don't want that going into Arizona."

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2010/09/jan_brewer_finally_admits_she.html

“The Pima County sheriff reported that 'the border has never been more secure.'"

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/where-did-jan-brewers-beheading-claim-come-from/

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2010/0904/Jan-Brewer-corrects-the-record-on-headless-bodies-in-the-desert

[stevenl]

I love how Trump protects the 1st Amendment. He really leads by example.

Donald Trump's campaign requires volunteers to sign a contract that forbids them from criticizing the Republican presidential front-runner, his family members, any Trump businesses or products, or his campaign. The six-page contract, reviewed in full by the Daily Dot, theoretically lasts for the entirety of a volunteer's life.

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/donald-trump-volunteer-contract-nda-non-disparagement-clause/

Damning if true. That wouldn't sit well with a large segment of voters, whom might otherwise, toss their hats in his corner. Wait and see. This is pretty new. Snope it in a couple of days. If it's disinformation, then more fuel has just been tossed on the fire for Trump.

Naw, his fans won't care.

[chuckd]

Anyone care to provide the information about "paid and professionally trained agitators". It can't be done because it isn't true, unless it is on the right wing side perhaps. And no, bratbart etc. doesn't count as legitimate information. Nobody in their correct mind believes any of the trash spewed out of those types of propaganda. Go demonstrators. Every single one of you right wingers condemning the protests would be jumping up and down with joy if it were stupid teabaggers doing it at a Bernie or Hillary rally. Hell you probably cheered when the government organized and coordinated a nation wide destruction of OWS. Trump is nothing but a proto-fascist and a con man. I see he is conning a few ah people on tv. Sorry guys, as bad as the Republicans and the super rich right wing has made America, it isn't going back to the "Gilded Age" or the days of slavery.

I have checked forum rules again and can't seem to find a rule that says we may post links only if sgtsabai likes them. Having said that, let me dare to make a post with which he might disagree.

I did find this article about some of the Chicago protesters. They were paid Community Organizer's that were instrumental in the near riots in Chicago. Does that count?

From the article...

"The man who stormed the podium and struck a Trump supporter in the face is Jedidiah Brown, a Chicago leftist community organizer who is always stirring the pot of racial divisions. Quovadis Green, a Black Lives Matters activist who orchestrated the protests in Chicago last December to shut down traffic in the Michigan Avenue shopping district on Black Friday last year, was a part of the organized protest as well."

Oh, yes, also in attendance was the convicted terrorist Bill Ayers...Obama's old buddy.

http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2016/03/paid-protesters-used-to-orchestrate.html

Sadly and with head held low, I must admit I also cheered when OWS was finally thrown out.

Cheers

[iReason]

^^^

What does an Indiana Neo-Con blog about Chicago have to do with Arizona?

Interesting that is the only article that says it.

No other reports from reputable news sources.

None.

Practice what you "preach".

And please dispense with your childish, simplistic, marginalizing labels. You know nothing about me. Except, that I think Trump is a scumbag.

P.S. See Post #51

[connda]

I love how Trump protects the 1st Amendment. He really leads by example.

Donald Trump's campaign requires volunteers to sign a contract that forbids them from criticizing the Republican presidential front-runner, his family members, any Trump businesses or products, or his campaign. The six-page contract, reviewed in full by the Daily Dot, theoretically lasts for the entirety of a volunteer's life.

http://www.dailydot.com/politics/donald-trump-volunteer-contract-nda-non-disparagement-clause/

Damning if true. That wouldn't sit well with a large segment of voters, whom might otherwise, toss their hats in his corner. Wait and see. This is pretty new. Snope it in a couple of days. If it's disinformation, then more fuel has just been tossed on the fire for Trump.

Naw, his fans won't care.

His 'supporters' really don't matter. He has to swing the independent vote. Without it, he won't sew up the primary. He's trying to campaign to attract disfranchised conservatives and those in the 'middle'. Control freaks who need NDAs aren't what I'd call 'conservative'. That's gonna bite him in the butt if it's true. The story broke 5 days ago, and I can't find anything on the Internet to discount it. Bad move if true.

[stevenl]

Anyone care to provide the information about "paid and professionally trained agitators". It can't be done because it isn't true, unless it is on the right wing side perhaps. And no, bratbart etc. doesn't count as legitimate information. Nobody in their correct mind believes any of the trash spewed out of those types of propaganda. Go demonstrators. Every single one of you right wingers condemning the protests would be jumping up and down with joy if it were stupid teabaggers doing it at a Bernie or Hillary rally. Hell you probably cheered when the government organized and coordinated a nation wide destruction of OWS. Trump is nothing but a proto-fascist and a con man. I see he is conning a few ah people on tv. Sorry guys, as bad as the Republicans and the super rich right wing has made America, it isn't going back to the "Gilded Age" or the days of slavery.

I have checked forum rules again and can't seem to find a rule that says we may post links only if sgtsabai likes them. Having said that, let me dare to make a post with which he might disagree.

I did find this article about some of the Chicago protesters. They were paid Community Organizer's that were instrumental in the near riots in Chicago. Does that count?

From the article...

"The man who stormed the podium and struck a Trump supporter in the face is Jedidiah Brown, a Chicago leftist community organizer who is always stirring the pot of racial divisions. Quovadis Green, a Black Lives Matters activist who orchestrated the protests in Chicago last December to shut down traffic in the Michigan Avenue shopping district on Black Friday last year, was a part of the organized protest as well."

Oh, yes, also in attendance was the convicted terrorist Bill Ayers...Obama's old buddy.

http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2016/03/paid-protesters-used-to-orchestrate.html

Sadly and with head held low, I must admit I also cheered when OWS was finally thrown out.

Cheers

So as always claiming but not substantiating. Claiming the protesters are paid to come and protest, but the only proof are other posters with the same claim.

[chuckd]

Well, you liberals can't say I didn't warn you.

I'm also not trying to convert any of you to a life of sanity.

All of you Trump, and by association chuckd, haters are not going to believe any link I put up so why should I really care what any of you think. Just for the record, I really don't care what you think of me.

I'm not even a Trump supporter, but I am a Hillary opponent and Bernie doesn't even exist in the real world. Bernie will never be nominated by the Democratic Party. He is an avowed Socialist that has claimed no party affiliation his entire political life. He is putting on a chameleon like appearance because that is all he has. If any of you are Bernie fans, then you are dumber than the most ardent Trump fan. Wake up and smell the roses.

The Democrats are left with Grandma Clinton and her horde of mischievous aides and she is currently under investigation by five, count 'em, five government agencies. Now I don't know if she will be indicted because I don't know what she might be holding over Obama's head, but I am 100% certain, in my mind, that she has broken numerous federal regulations in her handling of classified information and could very likely have used her position as SecState to grant political favors to international donors to the Clinton Foundation coffers.

She is a corrupt public official, a pathological liar and a beltway insider of the worst kind. If that is what some of you wish to support, then go for it. If she is not indicted, she will be the Democratic candidate. Knowing the Democrats as I do, even if she is indicted they will probably try and get her elected. If not her, then my guess is a draft Biden movement will spring up, the Kool Aid will be passed around and the faithful will name him as their nominee.

Therefore, with Bernie a nobody and Hillary dishonorable, the only one left standing is Trump...and I seriously doubt he will get through the convention. The RINOs that are the so called establishment want him out at any cost. They are willing to sacrifice a four or eight year loss of the White House to insure they have an establishment candidate and not somebody that will upset their very lucrative apple cart. My belief is the establishment will find some way to disenfranchise Trump and will go to a floor fight, where somebody like Romney will be nominated.

Now wouldn't it be really ironic that if, after all the thousands of words spewed out on this forum alone, none of the current protagonists were to even be nominated by their respective parties to run for the Presidency?

Attack away. but be sure you read my signature as well.

[chuckd]

^^^

What does an Indiana Neo-Con blog about Chicago have to do with Arizona?

Interesting that is the only article that says it.

No other reports from reputable news sources.

None.

Practice what you "preach".

And please dispense with your childish, simplistic, marginalizing labels. You know nothing about me. Except, that I think Trump is a scumbag.

P.S. See Post #51

My blog has about as much to do with Arizona as your post has to do with something Brewer said six years ago having anything to do with Trump.

In short...nothing on both accounts.

[Pinot]

Wow these stories from the USA sound just like when the redshirts would not allow yellow shirt politicians to rally or deliver speeches in the North to try and gain votes.

For all those that think it ok to block Trump from attending a perfectly legal gathering and that the protestors should not face any prosecution then clearly the US are respecting the protestors constitutional rights a lot more than the protestors are respecting the constitutional rights of Trump. The Irony.

The same organizing parties are now knee deep in the US election- Open Society, Tides Foundation, Soros money, etc. They brought you the Arab Spring, Red Shirts, Lavender revolution, crimson, color... etc. Look for the "fist" and a "color" to emerge.

There are genuine people who oppose Trump. There are genuine democrats who support others more than they oppose Trump. In the mix now are also paid and professionally trained agitators.

Where did you come up with "professionally trained agitators," Arj? Is that like a college course somewhere? Agitation 101?

Bullshit, right?

[Pinot]

Well, you liberals can't say I didn't warn you.

I'm also not trying to convert any of you to a life of sanity.

All of you Trump, and by association chuckd, haters are not going to believe any link I put up so why should I really care what any of you think. Just for the record, I really don't care what you think of me.

I'm not even a Trump supporter, but I am a Hillary opponent and Bernie doesn't even exist in the real world. Bernie will never be nominated by the Democratic Party. He is an avowed Socialist that has claimed no party affiliation his entire political life. He is putting on a chameleon like appearance because that is all he has. If any of you are Bernie fans, then you are dumber than the most ardent Trump fan. Wake up and smell the roses.

The Democrats are left with Grandma Clinton and her horde of mischievous aides and she is currently under investigation by five, count 'em, five government agencies. Now I don't know if she will be indicted because I don't know what she might be holding over Obama's head, but I am 100% certain, in my mind, that she has broken numerous federal regulations in her handling of classified information and could very likely have used her position as SecState to grant political favors to international donors to the Clinton Foundation coffers.

She is a corrupt public official, a pathological liar and a beltway insider of the worst kind. If that is what some of you wish to support, then go for it. If she is not indicted, she will be the Democratic candidate. Knowing the Democrats as I do, even if she is indicted they will probably try and get her elected. If not her, then my guess is a draft Biden movement will spring up, the Kool Aid will be passed around and the faithful will name him as their nominee.

Therefore, with Bernie a nobody and Hillary dishonorable, the only one left standing is Trump...and I seriously doubt he will get through the convention. The RINOs that are the so called establishment want him out at any cost. They are willing to sacrifice a four or eight year loss of the White House to insure they have an establishment candidate and not somebody that will upset their very lucrative apple cart. My belief is the establishment will find some way to disenfranchise Trump and will go to a floor fight, where somebody like Romney will be nominated.

Now wouldn't it be really ironic that if, after all the thousands of words spewed out on this forum alone, none of the current protagonists were to even be nominated by their respective parties to run for the Presidency?

Attack away. but be sure you read my signature as well.

Wow, Chucky! Just wow. Try and get some rest. Drink lots of fluids. This heat is tough for everyone