djjamie Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 (edited) No subs needed. That is why Prayut asked for a feasibility study to be conducted with a business case to be presented. After consideration the popular PM knocked it back. Well done on the navy trying to keep pushing it. It is not unique to Thailand. If it was in my best interests I would continue to press for it to. Edited July 22, 2016 by djjamie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tifino Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 of course they need them, otherwise , how the military will be able to discretly pocket billions baht. mmm, maybe another 'bent' on the [bottom-of-the-Harbour] Scheme concept? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCFC Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Only if they've got a sea of green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rorri Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 To all prospective Thai submariners, be afraid, be very very afraid, your country can't keep an aircraft carrier going, at least it floats, how the hell will your country safely maintain a sub. And with commisions being brought, do you really have faith in the subs commander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerojero Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 No......F. no! More stupidity from the military. Are the shores of Thailand so threatened that the Navy needs stealth with subs. F. stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.png.76be522b3b43e7458166b9dac9e422ed.png)
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now