webfact Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Car Hits Bike, Drags it Over 2km Around Moat but Driver Claims He Didn’t Even Know by CityNews CityNews – A car driver that hit a scooter and tried to escape by driving away, dragging the scooter over 2 kilometres before being stopped by a member of the public, told police that he had no idea he hit a bike when he was arrested last night. Around midnight last night, a black Honda Civic crashed into a motorbike on the outer moat road near the Suan Prung Hospital, throwing the bike driver to the ground. Full story: http://www.chiangmaicitylife.com/news/car-hits-bike-drags-it-over-2km-around-moat-but-driver-claims-he-didnt-even-know/ -- © Copyright Chiang City News 2016-11-04 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thechook Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 (edited) I call he is a lying piece of. whats the noise, sparks and why is it harder to drive? Edited November 4, 2016 by Thechook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinneil Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Hope he was breath tested and drug tested. No one could drag a scooter 2 ks without knowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inzman Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 hour ago, colinneil said: Hope he was breath tested and drug tested. No one could drag a scooter 2 ks without knowing. Or he could plead insanity like is becoming as popular as brake failure here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thechook Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 hour ago, colinneil said: Hope he was breath tested and drug tested. No one could drag a scooter 2 ks without knowing. Apparently thais can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worgeordie Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 (edited) He must have thought he left the handbrake on,or the car was not pulling very well and needed a tune up,lucky the motorbike rider was not dragged the 2 Km too. does not report if the driver was tested for alchol or drugs,which should be a given in cases like this. regards Worgeordie Edited November 4, 2016 by worgeordie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgordo38 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 5 hours ago, webfact said: told police that he had no idea he hit a bike when he was arrested last night. The old "the devil made me do it" defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey4u Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 He was taking the car to Honda due to a noise and sluggish acceleration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 I believe him, drunk on Thai whisky and a few ya ba pills can dull the senses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roo860 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Bloody hell never heard that excuse before, brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETERTHEEATER Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 I have reason to believe that the bike was being pushed by the car not dragged Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry The Bull Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Only two kilometer, no plomblem!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisY1 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 4 hours ago, inzman said: Or he could plead insanity like is becoming as popular as brake failure here. Then he'd be telling the truth....can't have that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinsdale Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 It's all OK. I've been told by a confidential source he's a facebook ideal. There's no problem here. Please go about your business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samsensam Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 he was trying to stop but his brakes weren't working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gk10002000 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 He may truthfully had no idea he did it. Fine. Then he clearly doesn't have the sensory capability nor mental capability to be driving. Off with the license, and motoring privileges. And of course he should still be liable for damages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The man from udon Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 They are that stupid they can't even do bull sh.how the funk he thought he could get out of that one is unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBsinter Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 I get the impression from the post that he is going to walk away from this............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briggsy Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 The age of the driver and the cost of the car when put into a Thai context mean that the driver did not pay for it himself. Mummy-Daddy bought/loaned/gave him the car and Mummy-Daddy will buy him out of trouble so there will be no further consequences of his actions. This is the way here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fstarbkk Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 1 hour ago, Briggsy said: The age of the driver and the cost of the car when put into a Thai context mean that the driver did not pay for it himself. Mummy-Daddy bought/loaned/gave him the car and Mummy-Daddy will buy him out of trouble so there will be no further consequences of his actions. This is the way here. Agree with your assessment. Further evidence is the fact that the driver was not named. This "courtesy" is not usually afforded to people with unimportant family names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdgbb Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 7 hours ago, Briggsy said: The age of the driver and the cost of the car when put into a Thai context mean that the driver did not pay for it himself. Mummy-Daddy bought/loaned/gave him the car and Mummy-Daddy will buy him out of trouble so there will be no further consequences of his actions. This is the way here. Doesn't mean anything of the sort. There is no suggestion that this was a new car, 2nd hand Civics can be cheap and any Thai with a job or guarantor can easily finance a car purchase for next to nothing per month. 6 hours ago, fstarbkk said: Agree with your assessment. Further evidence is the fact that the driver was not named. This "courtesy" is not usually afforded to people with unimportant family names. The driver was not named because he hadn't been identified at that stage. What courtesy was he afforded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now