webfact Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Three detained for allegedly seditious letter By THE NATION Srivara BANGKOK: -- THREE SUSPECTS accused of mailing seditious letters have been detained by the military for interrogation, deputy national police chief Pol General Srivara Ransibrahmanakul said yesterday. However, no arrest warrants had been issued for the suspects, he said. Srivara added that that he did not know if the suspects would be handed over to police, while it was still unclear if the three had been involved with political groups. Complaints had been lodged against the suspects for allegedly violating Article 116, he said, adding that some of suspects hailed from the Northeast. Article 116 of the Criminal Code refers to sedition. Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/politics/30300614 -- © Copyright The Nation 2016-11-23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldroj Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 As is oh so typical of these petty little people currently running this country, deputy national police chief Pol General Ransibrahmanakul is all to keen to be the first to claim any kudos by announcing that three suspects have been accused of mailing seditious letters. However, when pressed for details about their identities or whereabouts, he quickly passed the buck saying it was an Army affair. Meanwhile, another deputy (Prawit) also got into the act, telling us that any individual seen distributing leaflets (containing anti-government messages) would be immediately arrested, and that he would not tolerate acts of sedition that undermined national security. In a country whose name means "Land of the Free" (https://is.gd/gIEnqm), it is laughable that Prawit tells us "...there were surveillance cameras everywhere that would help officers apprehend suspects". Despite his bold assertion, events in August this year suggest otherwise !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 No arrest warrant, but detained nevertheless by the military no less. Thailand in 2016. The reason: "allegedly seditious letter" Oh my... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thechook Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 5 minutes ago, sjaak327 said: No arrest warrant, but detained nevertheless by the military no less. Thailand in 2016. The reason: "allegedly seditious letter" Oh my... Meanwhile there are 100K or more people supporting ISIS and some sending funds but prayuth's ego takes priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 We have this and in another thread the Minister of Justice says arresting a certain monk isn't worth the risk until a much delayed decision is actually made to charge him ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinneil Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 1 law for poor people, 1 law for senior monks who are making fools of the military government. Seditious letter !! WOW !! Hang them from the nearest tree, The military are making themselves look stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maoro2013 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 2 hours ago, colinneil said: 1 law for poor people, 1 law for senior monks who are making fools of the military government. Seditious letter !! WOW !! Hang them from the nearest tree, The military are making themselves look stupid. My thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgordo38 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 10 hours ago, webfact said: he said, adding that some of suspects hailed from the Northeast. Playing out like a Mad Max movie. Who lives in he Northeast?? I think this was meant to be a clue. Edited November 23, 2016 by elgordo38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamecn Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 What's next? seditious Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 12 hours ago, waldroj said: As is oh so typical of these petty little people currently running this country, deputy national police chief Pol General Ransibrahmanakul is all to keen to be the first to claim any kudos by announcing that three suspects have been accused of mailing seditious letters. However, when pressed for details about their identities or whereabouts, he quickly passed the buck saying it was an Army affair. Meanwhile, another deputy (Prawit) also got into the act, telling us that any individual seen distributing leaflets (containing anti-government messages) would be immediately arrested, and that he would not tolerate acts of sedition that undermined national security. In a country whose name means "Land of the Free" (https://is.gd/gIEnqm), it is laughable that Prawit tells us "...there were surveillance cameras everywhere that would help officers apprehend suspects". Despite his bold assertion, events in August this year suggest otherwise !!! Anyone who believes Pawtwit needs their head read the man handles the truth carelessly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retiredandhappyhere Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 There may be cameras everywhere but how many of them actually work? Oh, I must be more careful, as I just had a seditious thought! Better not put it in writing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debate101 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 They serve themselves, no one else. How doesn't everyone get this by now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgordo38 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 18 hours ago, lamecn said: What's next? seditious Thoughts? What the H is seditious anyways. Is it like being seduced, government sodomy (I think we have all felt this one), lightly bad or seriously bad or real bad. I must Google it as it looks like a serious word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now