Favouring refugees over local workers, would that not be a discriminatory act? Why aren't all the liberals and lefties up in arms  about it? 

 

Hypocrites, that's why.

10 hours ago, rabas said:

10,000 fewer American citizens will have jobs, not a good move Starbucks. But hey, Redcup.

If you actually read it you would know that he said in 75 countries.Also once their in aren't they Americans.

call me cynical but the same group of people  who own Starbucks are allegedly behind the push for mass multiculturalism of the Western world and now they are giving jobs to non Americans because it suits their agenda

 

 

Just now, Slartibardfast said:

call me cynical but the same group of people  who own Starbucks are allegedly behind the push for mass multiculturalism of the Western world and now they are giving jobs to non Americans because it suits their agenda

 

 

Well, its stock is offered on Nasdaq and is widely traded.  So who do you think owns Starbucks?

7 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

Well, its stock is offered on Nasdaq and is widely traded.  So who do you think owns Starbucks?

it wouldnt be prudent for me to say on this site..do your own research

12 hours ago, ddavidovsky said:

Giving local people's jobs to refugees is a massive moral hazard that will only encourage more opportunistic migration and cultural disintegration.

 

I'm now boycotting Starbucks.

 

I will join you, but mostly because it is so overpriced for what you get. 

On 1/30/2017 at 10:23 AM, rabas said:

10,000 fewer American citizens will have jobs, not a good move Starbucks. But hey, Redcup.

yea , i bet the existing staff just love this idea ...............................