youreavinalaff

Yey. Much obliged.

Good to see we have a far right troll to go with the resident leftie. Gives the whole feel of things a finer balance. 😆😆😆

Conversation. It's what people do on forums. I used the words "possibly" and "could" for a reason. You are trying too hard at your favourite hobby and failing because of that.

In the by-election. The subject of my comment.

It was deemed so on this forum, by the usual suspects, when the Conservatives lost a by-election. When I said "Labour could be in trouble" I was referring to the by-election. The subject of my comment.

Only after charges have been laid.

Do you really need to wonder? Do you not understand the law?

There's a possibility of a by-election in the not too distant future, if MP Amesbury is convicted. I believe his majority was over 14000. That by-election will be a good insight as to how people are thinking. If the electorate are working people or pensioners, very likely, maybe with a splattering of farmers, business owners and people classed as non working people because they have a few quid in the bank, Labour could be in trouble.

Cutting and pasting your own posts. 🤣🤣🤣 With an IQ allegedly as high as yours, I'd have thought you'd be able to think of something else to write.

Many parts of your posts aren't in plain text. They are faintly highlighted. A sure sign of cut and paste. With an allegedly high IQ, I'd have thought you'd have known that.

Where are you cutting and pasting from?

I have. I guess you are in denial. A slip up that is now uneditable. so you move on to derogatory comments. Rinse and repeat.

I've identified it. That's why I commented about it.

There's no need to challenge a contradiction. It speaks for itself.

You twist so far you end up contradicting yourself to get out of a hole. Quelle surprise.