Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Ocasio-Cortez Leaves Door Open to 2028 Presidential Run

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has declined to rule out a potential run for the White House in 2028, saying her political goals are focused on broader national change rather than holding a particular office.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The New York Democrat made the remarks during a Friday event in Chicago when she was asked about speculation surrounding a possible presidential campaign.

Responding to the question from Democratic strategist David Axelrod, Ocasio-Cortez rejected the suggestion that her ambitions were tied to seeking a specific title or position.

Remarks Fuel Questions About Future Bid

“They assume that my ambition is a title or a seat, and my ambition is way bigger than that,” she said. “My ambition is to change this country.”

She added that while elected officials may come and go, policies such as single-payer healthcare can have lasting impact.

Ocasio-Cortez said she bases her political decisions on current circumstances rather than long-term plans tied to a particular role.

“Conditions change radically all the time,” she said, explaining that she evaluates the political landscape day by day to determine which actions might help advance her policy goals.

3500.webp

Decisions Guided by ‘Conditions’

The congresswoman, who is serving her fourth term in the House of Representatives, said she seeks to make decisions that move the country “closer to that future, stronger, faster, better than yesterday.”

Her comments come amid growing discussion about possible Democratic candidates in the 2028 presidential race.

Democrats Eye Possible Contenders

Several Democratic figures are already being mentioned as potential contenders to return the party to the White House in 2028.

Among those frequently cited are Gavin Newsom, governor of California; former vice president Kamala Harris; Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer; former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg; Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro; and Kentucky governor Andy Beshear.

Illinois governor JB Pritzker recently praised what he described as the Democratic Party’s strong bench of possible candidates.

Speaking at an event in New York, Pritzker said he was focused on winning re-election as governor but stressed his commitment to helping the party reclaim the presidency.

“We have a pretty good bench,” he said, adding that he intends to work to elect a Democrat in 2028.

Republican Field Also Taking Shape

On the Republican side, several figures are also seen as potential successors to Donald Trump after his second term.

Among those widely viewed as possible candidates are Vice President J. D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Trump himself has at times suggested he might seek a third term, despite the limit set by the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which restricts presidents to two terms in office.

The president’s business organization, the Trump Organization, introduced “Trump 2028” hats last April, and Trump later told reporters he would “love to” run again.

Speculation Likely to Continue

While Ocasio-Cortez did not confirm any presidential ambitions, her comments left open the possibility of a future bid as discussion about the 2028 race continues within both major political parties.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 10 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
Just now, stevenl said:

The goal of the save act is to limit voting.

Yes, the right wants to limit voting to citizens only, that's why the left opposes it.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you think illegal aliens should be deported?

Do you think they should be allowed to vote?

I dont care !! iam not a yank but remember your country was built on immigrates

metisdead Legendary Member

A racist troll post has been removed.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, stevenl said:

The goal of the save act is to limit voting.

Well that's the argument from the left and MSM. Others say it's to guarantee that only US citizens can vote.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Yes, the right wants to limit voting to citizens only, that's why the left opposes it.

Time and time again it has been shown, that illegals voting is not an issue. Therefore only the gullible fall for this.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
Just now, MikeandDow said:

I dont care !! iam not a yank but remember your country was built on immigrates

It was not built on illegal immigrants. It was built by Americans.

E pluribus unum

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

It was not built on illegal immigrants. It was built by Americans.

E pluribus unum

read my post Immigrants NOT illegal or can you not read

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Nope. I understand. If you vote you must be a citizen which you have to prove. Same for all nations? So far no-one has stated any other nation where proof of citizenship is not required to enroll to vote.

you never answered the question how do you prove it !!

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

I dont care !! iam not a yank but remember your country was built on immigrates

Yep. Legal immigration.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Time and time again it has been shown, that illegals voting is not an issue. Therefore only the gullible fall for this.

Shown by who?

So why should people not have to show ID to vote?

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Yep. Legal immigration.

says the wannabe yank

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Shown by who?

So why should people not have to show ID to vote?

Proof of citizenship to enroll to vote and ID to vote. Surely this is the global standard. Why the fuss from the progressive left?

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member

If she wants to run, she should run,

After Trump and thank God there will eventually be an after Trump, it's clear that Americans are no longer very interested in more conventional politicians with more normal resumes.

So really for either party, almost anything goes.

On the R side Jew hating, Putin loving, demagogue Tucker Carlson has a real shot as does nepo baby total moron totally unqualified maga fascist DJTJ.

So it wouldn't be very surprising at all if the Ds go with a populist like AOC.

Personally I'm liking JB Pritzger a lot but he has a more conventional resume, but being billionaire fighting for more economic equality is a bit different. Yes, hes a populist as well.

Trump sort of did that in his marketing lies as he's a fake populist, but I think JB is actually sincere.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

says the wannabe yank

This is just childish. Australia was in the same boat. Needed immigration to help build the nation.

JTPR1 Apprentice Member

JTPR1

Member

Good choice if the Democrats' chief goal is showing the world how "progressive" they are and don't give a damn about getting elected.

Otherwise suicidal. But I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, JTPR1 said:

Good choice if the Democrats' chief goal is showing the world how "progressive" they are and don't give a damn about getting elected.

Otherwise suicidal. But I wouldn't be at all surprised.

You're thinking in conventional terms as if these are normal times and as if the US is still a normal country.

If she's up against Tucker Carlson who is a totally absurd choice for president, she would be quite competitive.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

it's clear that Americans are no longer very interested in more conventional politicians

Interesting you say this because Trump is far from your conventional politician. He pretty much does what he says he's going to do.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If she wants to run, she should run,

After Trump and thank God there will eventually be an after Trump, it's clear that Americans are no longer very interested in more conventional politicians with more normal resumes.

So really for either party, almost anything goes.

On the R side Jew hating, Putin loving, demagogue Tucker Carlson has a real shot as does nepo baby total moron totally unqualified maga fascist DJTJ.

So it wouldn't be very surprising at all if the Ds go with a populist like AOC.

Personally I'm liking JB Pritzger a lot but he has a more conventional resume, but being billionaire fighting for more economic equality is a bit different.

Trump sort of did that in his marketing lies as he's a fake populist, but I think JB is actually sincere.

I am not so sure there will be an after trump for a long time yet !! they are laying the ground work for 2018 !!!

blaze master Diamond Member

blaze master

Advanced Member

We've been told on this forum for years now that fascists are in charge. So there won't be an election.

Yet here we are saying after Trump. Makes total sense. How laughable.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member
Just now, MikeandDow said:

I am not so sure there will be an after trump for a long time yet !! they are laying the ground work for 2018 !!!

Well I was going to say something like that. There will literally be an after Trump as he's mortal. But it is a very open question whether there will be future real elections in 2028 or even 2026. Russian has elections. They aren't real. Trump has made a lot of "progress" moving the USA to be more like Putin's Russia.

blaze master Diamond Member

blaze master

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Well I was going to say something like that. There will literally be an after Trump as he's mortal. But it is a very open question whether there will be future real elections in 2018 or even 2016. Russian has elections. They aren't real. Trump has made a lot of "progress" moving the USA to be more like Putin's Russia.

I think your both off a little in your dates.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Well I was going to say something like that. There will literally be an after Trump as he's mortal. But it is a very open question whether there will be future real elections in 2018 or even 2016. Russian has elections. They aren't real. Trump has made a lot of "progress" moving the USA to be more like Putin's Russia.

i believe you are right will see how it will work in the mid terms

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member

AN political threads are hilarious ... Rock On

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If she wants to run, she should run,

After Trump and thank God there will eventually be an after Trump, it's clear that Americans are no longer very interested in more conventional politicians with more normal resumes.

So really for either party, almost anything goes.

On the R side Jew hating, Putin loving, demagogue Tucker Carlson has a real shot as does nepo baby total moron totally unqualified maga fascist DJTJ.

So it wouldn't be very surprising at all if the Ds go with a populist like AOC.

Personally I'm liking JB Pritzger a lot but he has a more conventional resume, but being billionaire fighting for more economic equality is a bit different. Yes, hes a populist as well.

Trump sort of did that in his marketing lies as he's a fake populist, but I think JB is actually sincere.

Yeah, the fat, white, billionaire, anti-Israel JB Pritzger is perfect for the left. He should convert to Islam if he wants a shot in the primary.

JTPR1 Apprentice Member

JTPR1

Member

Current polling of Democrats' candidate preferences for 2028 have Kamala leading the pack.

And 77% of Democrats polled believe there has been a "genocide" in Gaza.

And a majority of Democrats polled don't think undocumented immigration during the Biden administration was too much.

It's like they don't want to win elections.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, JTPR1 said:

Current polling of Democrats' candidate preferences for 2028 have Kamala leading the pack.

And 77% of Democrats polled believe there has been a "genocide" in Gaza.

And a majority of Democrats polled don't think undocumented immigration during the Biden administration was too much.

It's like they don't want to win elections.

I don't believe what you posted about immigration. Post evidence.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, the fat, white, billionaire, anti-Israel JB Pritzger is perfect for the left. He should convert to Islam if he wants a shot in the primary.

He's lost a lot of weight. Proof he is running.

I don't think putting American interests first over Israeli is being anti-Israel per se.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

He's lost a lot of weight. Proof he is running.

Yeah, Tim Walz too. Ozempic.

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I don't think putting American interests first over Israeli is being anti-Israel per se.

He supports blocking U.S. arms sales to Israel.

Autocan Advanced Member

Autocan

Member
12 hours ago, webfact said:

Among those frequently cited are Gavin Newsom, governor of California; former vice president Kamala Harris; Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer; former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg; Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro; and Kentucky governor Andy Beshear.

Ok, let's go through these one after another.

  1. Newsom: Status quo mainstream candidate and the rest of the country doesn't want to look like CA, except for the weather in SC.

  2. Harris: Hilariously inept as we found out the first time. Begone, loser.

  3. Whitmer: Fantastic! Charismatic, witty and a proven administrator.

  4. Buttigieg: Transportation Sec. par inexcellence, mealy-mouthed, and, I'll just come out and say it, USA isn't ready yet for a gay candidate.

  5. Shapiro: AIPAC? No.

  6. Beshear: Never heard of him.

  7. Forgot, AOC: Telegenic but lacks gravitas. Can be a forceful leader in the House, a younger Pelosi, and visit the WH with cameras in tow. But live there? No.

The Dems should've put up Whitmer in '24 after a quickie primary but they never mustered the balls. And here we are with a 100-year-old adolescent f*** up in the WH.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Autocan said:

Ok, let's go through these one after another.

  1. Newsom: Status quo mainstream candidate and the rest of the country doesn't want to look like CA, except for the weather in SC.

  2. Harris: Hilariously inept as we found out the first time. Begone, loser.

  3. Whitmer: Fantastic!

  4. Buttigieg: Transportation Sec. par inexcellence, mealy-mouthed, and, I'll just come out and say it, USA isn't ready yet for a gay candidate.

  5. Shapiro: AIPAC? No.

  6. Beshear: Never heard of him.

  7. Forgot, AOC: Telegenic but lacks gravitas. Can be a forceful leader in the House, a younger Pelosi, and visit the WH with cameras in tow. But live there? No.

The Dems should've put up Whitmer in '24 after a quickie primary but they never mustered the balls. And here we are with a 100-year-old adolescent f*** up in the WH.

Agree Whitmer is very good but she's a woman (two recent losses) and has a conventional resume.

I think the odds are more towards a populist from the Ds now.

Also for some reason I don't see her as inspiring the passions and that's needed as presidential elections are more about emotions than policies.

Maybe I'm wrong.

I would be a little surprised if she even runs.

Kelly is getting a lot of attention. Boring but he could win.

Wouldn't rule out Beshear. Name recognition can be increased.

My pick JB is more of a dark horse but more and more pundits are noticing him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.