Jump to content

WorriedNoodle

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

9,074 profile views

WorriedNoodle's Achievements

Star Member

Star Member (12/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • Very Popular Rare

Recent Badges

20.3k

Reputation

  1. Now there's an example of pot calling the kettle black eh?
  2. Such a shame you limit yourself to opinions of only one political bias? Why not open your mind? Some helpers below: Several media watchdog organizations, including AllSides and Ad Fontes Media, have rated the New York Post as having a right-leaning bias, meaning that its coverage tends to favor conservative viewpoints and perspectives. This bias can be seen in the types of stories the New York Post chooses to cover, the language it uses in its reporting, and the opinion pieces it publishes. While it's important to note that every news outlet has some degree of bias, the New York Post is generally not considered a neutral or unbiased source of news and information. Of course, it's always a good idea to consume a variety of news sources with different political leanings in order to get a well-rounded understanding of current events and issues.
  3. He should be promoted to Captain soon with such impressive detective work.
  4. You really need to ask this? While the smell of tobacco may not be unpleasant to everyone, there are indeed serious health concerns associated with inhaling secondhand smoke. Here are some of the potential dangers: Carcinogens: Secondhand smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, including at least 70 known carcinogens (cancer-causing substances), such as benzene, arsenic, and formaldehyde. Cardiovascular Disease: Exposure to secondhand smoke can increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases, even among non-smokers. Lung Disease: Secondhand smoke can cause or exacerbate a variety of lung conditions, including chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma. Other Health Risks: Secondhand smoke has also been linked to other health problems, such as ear infections, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and cognitive impairment in children.
  5. Whilst I appreciate your information sharing, I cannot get my head around why you let your partner have full control of the ATM card over your 800k bank account used for immigration? Surely there is a less risky way of arranging the proceeds of your accounts goes to the partner went you do move on as you put? Each to their own of course, respect!
  6. Great idea. Hopefully it will take most of your time away from posting drivel on AN. If the first book is a success, make a series of them,
  7. That idea would create quite a traffic jam considering it takes several hours wait doing walk in method.
  8. The person asking for help in this situation seems to be the one causing the problem. Killing trees simply because they attract birds is not only environmentally destructive, but it's also unlikely to solve the underlying issue. Birds are an important part of the ecosystem and play a crucial role in pollinating plants, controlling insect populations, and maintaining the overall health of the environment. Additionally, the presence of birds can be a sign of a healthy ecosystem, and their songs and chirping can be a source of joy and beauty for many people. Rather than killing the trees, the person could consider other options for addressing their concerns, such as using bird deterrents, planting different types of trees that may be less attractive to birds, or simply learning to appreciate the presence of birds in their environment. Ultimately, the approach of simply killing trees to solve a perceived problem is not only harmful to the environment but also reflects a lack of understanding of the complex interconnection of ecosystems and the value of biodiversity.
  9. What utter and complete nonsense. Nowhere in the lead article does it mention the political leaning of the perp. It just says he was a nut job. Such a bitter and divisive life one must lead to think otherwise no?
  10. While it's certainly true that Attorney General appointments are an important part of any administration, it's concerning to see comments like this that seem to suggest a desire for partisan retribution rather than impartial justice. The role of the Attorney General is to uphold the law and ensure that justice is served, not to advance a political agenda. The implication that anyone who disagrees with this appointment must be a "Democrat" or "RINO" is unhelpful and divisive. It's important to respect the right of all Americans to have their own opinions and to engage in healthy debate without resorting to name-calling or demonizing those who disagree with us. Are you proud to be such a partisan demonizer? Ultimately, we should all hope that the new Attorney General will prioritize the rule of law and the interests of the American people above any political considerations of partisanship and retribution. Not a DEM or a RINO - just an outsider laughing at the hideousness of some of the American electorate and their politics of today.
  11. The opinion you shared certainly seems infantile and problematic for several reasons: Victim-blaming: The comment suggests that the current tensions in Ukraine are the fault of those who are supporting Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression, rather than the fault of Russia itself. This is a form of victim-blaming, which shifts the responsibility for the conflict away from the aggressor and onto the victim. Minimizing the threat of Russian aggression: The comment refers to Russia as a "Bear" that is being poked, which minimizes the very real threat that Russia poses to Ukraine and to European security more broadly. This kind of language can make it easier to excuse or justify Russian aggression, rather than holding Russia accountable for its obscene actions. Fear-mongering: The comment also engages in fear-mongering by suggesting that continued support for Ukraine could lead to a nuclear war. While it's important to be aware of the risks of escalation, this kind of language is hyperbolic and alarmist, and can be used to justify inaction or appeasement. What's it feel like being an appeaser?
  12. It's important to note that the Ukraine conflict is not purely a proxy war, as it also involves a complex mix of historical, cultural, and domestic factors that have fueled tensions between Ukraine and Russia. The conflict has also had a major impact on the Ukrainian people, who have suffered significant loss of life and displacement as a result of the fighting.
  13. More deflection as normal. It's up to Trump, he can go on an openly broadcast over the air TV show anytime he wants? He can even go on SNL and they have a pre election special on Monday!
  14. The similarities between Trump's rally and the 1939 pro-Nazi event are disturbing because of the extremist rhetoric and hateful language that was on display at Trump's rally. Speakers at the event made racist and xenophobic remarks, mocking Puerto Ricans, Hispanics, Jews, and Palestinians. They also leveled personal attacks against Vice President Kamala Harris, calling her a "prostitute" and the "Antichrist."

×
×
  • Create New...