WorriedNoodle

Most likely Eris, goddess of discord perched on your shoulder. Meet Harmonia of the other side.

This perspective sounds like it’s coming from a pretty narrow view of British politics. "Gammons" comes to mind. Typically portrayed as men (though not exclusively) with flushed faces, bald heads, and England flags draped everywhere, often driving white vans they need for their side jobs. A badge of honor for a lack of sophistication and nationalist fervor.

What are you snorting? While the rioters didn't directly kill anyone with their guns, they did use them in a threatening manner, which contributed to the chaos and violence of the attack. Some rioters openly carried rifles and handguns, displaying them in an intimidating manner and causing fear among the Capitol Police and members of Congress. Several rioters who were later arrested were found to be carrying concealed weapons, including handguns and zip ties, which led to fears that they were planning to take hostages or engage in violence.

The reality is you are just rehashing conspiracy theory nonsense from behind a keyboard and likely never set foot anywhere near those places affected by fires.

I've not bought any lappies, but bought some cheap Chinese mini PC(-ies) with legit Win11 Pro o/s for under 5000THB, built in SSD. They work just fine and I would have no hesitation buying a laptop also these days, very good value for money.

So politics created hurricane force winds and droughts that flamed the fires across whole towns? You'll be saying next it was the sexual orientation of the fire chief there next that failed to control the flames.

It takes a special kind of hate in a person like the op who can politicize a natural disaster like this. Wildfires are often the result of multiple factors, including climate change, weather patterns, human behavior, and even past fire suppression policies. Trying to assign blame to any one factor or person ignores the complexity of the issue.

Such drama queen bunkum. It wasn't a political party you don't like that destroyed homes in LA. It was a fire. Even cavemen understood what fire is.

What do you expect? He has already proven himself during his previous tenure by throwing toilet rolls to storm ravaged survivors in Puerto Rico and re-drawn national government weather maps with his own marker pen in the oval office to explain his erroneous tweets on a hurricane path!

Let's stat with... 1. Starmer was head of the CPP. 2. Labour just voted against an inquiry. Utter nonsense and you know it. Starmer’s association with the grooming cases as CPP occurred over a decade ago, and the cases were investigated and prosecuted under his watch. Despite this, he is still being targeted by far-right groups and politicians today for political reasons. By bringing up the grooming scandal today, Elon Musk with his tools and other social media bedroom warriors are trying to cast doubt on his handling of the grooming cases and tarnish his reputation and ultimately undermine support for the Labour Party who were otherwise not in power and in opposition during the whole period.

This all sounds a bit ridiculous and extremist anti Starmer driven by social media gurus and bedroom 'fact checking' warriors. Fact is this story is over a decade old, perps have been jailed, inquiries were already held and that the last Tory government didn't act on all the findings is the fault of the current 6 months in power government why exactly?

Do you really believe any of the words spoken? He/his team use words like “alternative facts”, “bigly” and he tweets “covfefe” in the early hours of the morning. You can make sense of these words?

We've all come across racist bigots mouthing off from bar stools and the like, but where do you draw the line on the right to spout such on public platforms at government rallies? Absolutely anything is fare game for you, or do you have some boundaries?

Welcome to the dog eat dog world of self obsessed shytsters.

Auditioning for TukTukPatrol?