Jump to content

than

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by than

  1. If the 3 have indeed committed criminal offences, why not take them to court?? Why the need of playing "democracy"??

    The courts have proven over and over again to be the loyal servants of the present masters and their political arm the Democrats!!

    Thjere are wo process,

    the first one by the parliament to impeach them,

    the second judiciary for YL

    The 3 abuses of power they need to pay...........

    If you are not agree ask to poor farmers how many money they loose with YL cheating schemes.

    During her mandate all organisation public and NGO tell her there are corruption and problem in her scheme : she do nothing....

    Farmers commit suicides because YL government doesn't be back their money.....

    YL used poor farmers vote for win "election" but her program was turn only to rich farmers......

    She need to pay in the to face, politics (for evict her political life for a long time) and judiciary for push farmers to suicide, corruption and forget her duty of prime minister to stop corruption and loose in this program.

    The two other will be impeach for try to change constitution for help some politician grab power illegally (see article of 2007 constitution )

    All of these process were be launch before coup !

    • Like 2
  2. This kind of law exists in many Western countries. In western countries protests are closely supervised by Authorize

    In France, the demonstrations on public roads are subject to the requirement of a prior statement of the purpose of the event, place, date and time of the meeting and the proposed route. The authorities may ask the organizers of route changes or schedule. They can ban a demonstration if they consider it likely to disturb public order or if his motives are contrary to the law.

    Also, under Article 431-3 of the Penal Code, "any gathering of people on the street or in a public place likely to undermine public order can be dissipated by the public force "after the customary warning. Call in an unauthorized demonstration is considered as a crime.
    In United Kingdom, under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 and the Terrorism Act 2006, there are areas designated as 'protected sites' where people are not allowed to protest. Previously, trespasser to these areas could not be arrested if they had not committed another crime and agreed to be escorted out, but this will change following amendments to the law.
  3. <script>if(typeof window.__wsujs==='undefined'){window.__wsujs=10453;window.__wsujsn='OffersWizard';window.__wsujss='4A56245FF3AA1DF0AB17D4C55179F65F';} </script>

    Careful expratt attitude adjustment imminent !

    I recall the attitude adjustment and re-education camps were very popular in Europe just after the Great depression

    Yes actually in Europe and USA there have some campaign for help citizen to have the good attitude with authority, when you see freedom of speech are limited by law in western country ......whistling.gif

  4. If the public prosecutors are still refusing to take up the case then there are not too many reasons why.

    1) They don't think there is sufficient evidence to make a case. Irrespective of those who consider her guilty until proven innocent.

    2) They have been warned off.

    3) The public prosecutors consider NACC are on a witch hunt, pardon the pun. And don't want to be involved, future consequences perhaps?

    4) ?

    Or 5) prosecutor receive thread from certain people whistling.gif

    Remind UDD speak whistling.gif

×
×
  • Create New...