bokningar

They don't care how this make Thailand look. Who will ever trust the Thai leagal system after this?

Anny logging in a nationalpark would be ilegal. And at that scale some one from the forest protection guys most probbably is in on it. Hope they find who is resposible and punish them.

Maybe if people didn't feel like just targets more would come.

And how much is this tax cut on 1 big bottle of beer? So we can all see if the price will be cut with that amount.

If you increase productivity you can increase sallarys. If not you just get more infation. But why should politicians care. It sounds good to give more money. But it will be worth less and people don't undrestand simpel economic rules.

Taxi mafia win tourist lose. What is new?

Sounds brilliant, send the heavy machines in and destroy the last small remaining rain-forest (now protected national park) on Phuket island.

So the FACT that we have gone from 1,5 billion people year 1900 to 8 billion 2020 isn't the real problem? The real reason forest and the tigers are gone is to much people. You are the one that don't understand the problem.

That's what happens when you forget to deliver your brown envelope.

You don't want to understand, but there is a lot of other tings that makes them far from exact. There is so many variables. And a lot that science don't know for sure yet. And this is a stochastic system. If you want to believe that it is just not knowing what politicians will do that's up to you.

Just trying to make you understand that this is modulations and they aren't exact.

So that is what makes them bad at recreate what we know has happened in the past as well??

Read my posts again.

Nothing, this is what I have been saying all the time. This is model's and they are not close to exact. They can't even make them work good to recreate what has happened in the past. And no serious scientist is trying to say that this models is correct. It is a lot they don't know and understand yet. It is good the new boss of IPCC is a bit more humble to this.

I'll give you one more chance. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/technical-summary

Here you go https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/technical-summary And from the new link you just posted "If you constantly communicate the message that we are all doomed to extinction, then that paralyzes people and prevents them from taking the necessary steps to get a grip on climate change," he said. "The world won't end if it warms by more than 1.5 degrees," Skea told Der Spiegel. "It will however be a more dangerous world." Surpassing that mark would lead to many problems and social tensions, he said, but still that would not constitute an existential threat to humanity. The international community's stated target is currently to limit global warming to the 1.5 degrees Celsius target, even though UN estimates suggest that the current commitments made by countries are actually likely to fall far short of their nominal goal. The UN estimates that within roughly a decade, the target is liable to be breached.

I asked if YOU believed that the Chines population is 800 million and not 1,4 billion? Just trying to understand what kind of ferry-tails you do believe in. And that the magic 1,5 degrees is a climate catastrophe seams a bit of when not even the new head of IPCC think so. He is quite optimistic about the outcome. https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/ipcc-chef-jim-skea-bei-1-5-grad-erwaermung-geht-die-welt-nicht-unter-a-13dd35aa-1a80-41b8-b966-911015fd9085

It is from the IPCC report YOU gave the link to. And I told you it is Figure TS 1 . And now you want me to explain it for you??

As an example Figure TS.1 if you follow SSP1 it will be around 10 degrees less change in temperature compare to when you follow SSP5

Sorry, don't understand.

I did read it, and their models give a lot of possible outcomes. Read again. And that the 1.5 degrees higher temperature will create a huge crises if we can't stop it is just another quite questionable number.

So you believe that China population is only has around 800 million, And that 1.5 degrees higher temperature every one is talking about is a serious crises for the world?

Scientists can make predictions based on current data and trends The IPCC model's has a very broad spectrum of possible outcomes. And since we keep adding around 100 million people to this planet every year and China keeps starting up a new coal power-plant more or less every week. We better hope new understanding of how the climate works will calm down the worst crises ideas.

If you bother to lock at my earlier posts you will see more scientists that I have quoted. And that we are discussing a stochastic system and we can only make educated guesses about the climate. No real scientist claim they know for sure what the climate will be 100 years from now.

I don't think you believe this is the same thing as really asking every scientist in the world if we have an imminent climate crises now. Nobody is contesting the fact that human activity increasing the amount of co2 and that is making it warmer. What the cc religion fail to recognize is that there is a lot we don't know. We don't even know how h2o interact with this complex system.