Jump to content

puck2

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by puck2

  1. On 9/20/2018 at 8:37 PM, Srikcir said:

    It is not.

    Immigration court does not belong to the Judiciary branch but to the Executive branch.

    You learned correctly.

    Please help me to understand this nonsense.

    If a judiciary branch belongs to the executive then there is no independent third shelter in a democracy!  And that is how democracy is defined: 3 independent (!) powers in a state !!!

    Therefore I repeat it, the US judiciary is like a Swiss cheese. Don't let me talk about the US Supreme Court, stinking cheese.

  2. I learnt in school about the judiciary that it is one of the three shelters of a democracy and should be nonpartisan.

     

    In the USA under Trump and Sessions it is intensively regulated by the executive. This is evidently shown day by day.

     

    This is another proof for what I said before: the US political and state system and especially the judiciary is like a Swiss cheese – full of holes.

  3. The German executive in the parliament, Bundestag, consists of 3 parties. CDU (Christian Democratic Union) with Merkel as leader, her sister-party CSU (Christian Social Union; only in Bavaria) with Seehofer as leader and the SPD (Social Democratic Party) with Nahles as leader.

     

    All 3 parties are on their way down as polls have proven. One reason for their declining is the distance between what the politicians do and what the commonality wants. The political Maassen disaster is just a proper example of it. Rewarding Maassen for his ineptitude by a promotion as state secretary in the interior ministry which is under Seehofer. Topping the stupidity of these 3 politicians – they dumped an overall accepted and recognized man (SPD) to replace him by Maassen, not an (technical) expert for the new job, at all.

     

    This shows the politicians don't worry about quality but about their own interests. One reason the people loathe them more and more (look at the poll results). To understand their horrible behavior a little bit (but not accepting it), in Bavaria, Seehofer's homeland, there will be (state)elections next month on October 14. He didn't want to drop Maassen.

     

    Instead of firing Seehofer because he didn't want to sack Maassen, Merkel agreed to his promotion. Nahles too. Official reason for all 3 concerned party members: there was a big danger that the GroKo (great coalition of the above mentioned 3 Parties) would crash, That would be dangerous at the moment for the BRD.

     

    Their untruthful explanation. The real reason, all 3 parties are afraid of a new election in the light of the declining poll results. They have been afraid of protest votes against them – all 3 parties. But exactly this will happen in the coming elections.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. Webfact wrote

     

    Quote

    "The so-called agreement on Maassen is a joke," Florian Post, an SPD lawmaker in the Bavarian regional assembly, told the RND newspaper group. "Either the man is fit to hold high office or he isn't."

     

     

    But Mr. Post also said (but here not printed): „What did they drink during the crisis meeting?“

     

    I think that outlined what has happened in this meeting, `cause to reward Maassen by a promotion – look at Naam's #16 - for his incredible misjudgement of the situation in Chemnitz. Hold in mind, he is/was the boss of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Result, an reward for incompetence and stupidity given by the 3 party leaders.

     

    Face saving politicians at the cost of common sense, that is what makes most Germans so angry.

    • Thanks 1
  5. Knowsitlike, #16, explains it is possible for PR (permanent residents). In this case you need the TM6 card for leaving Thailand („on the way out“). But there not so many falangs with an PR, i guess.

     

    Therefore it would be interesting to read details from somebody in TV who made this flight from Hong Kong (and if she/he needed a TM6). There are no doubts checking through the automatic pass control is the fastest way for people with a „tourist visa“. The demanded information has been delivered by CX (Hongkong) through the APPS to BKK.

     

    But nothing is said about what you have to do or to show when leaving Thailand to Hong Kong by the same system. I guess you have to stay in the same row as every time before and to deliver the needed documents. Out of my viewpoint, that means leaving Thailand is not the same procedure as when arriving (by APPS). Result: you save time when arriving, not when leaving Thailand.

     

    BTW, my best German friend is married to a Chinese lady, A few days before he told me this APPS (system) now is a normal procedure in most Airports of China, especially in the big ones. As in Kunming in his case. When arriving in Kunming he received a small „paper“ after finishing the process. This paper was needed for his departure. But I didn't ask for details.

     

  6. 15 minutes ago, strikingsunset said:


    and your post is spot on - i totally agree - in 10 years time the UK will be booming and my guess is the other 27 or so countries will be collectively - down the tubes - rushing to the printing presses


    Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

     

    It seems you have contacted a soothsayer. How much did you have to pay for his forecast?

     

  7. On 9/11/2018 at 11:54 AM, tropo said:

    It's the other way around actually. If the Trump haters want to be taken seriously, then spell his name correctly instead of using childish tactics (deliberate misspellings) to deflect. When I see this, I stop reading and move to the next post. All they are doing is talking to their own fan club.

    Do you know the main difference between "Trump haters" and Trump minions?

     

    Trump minions discuss the label of a bottle of wine, the Trump "haters" discuss the content of the bottle.

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  8. A typical Thai problem. The chemicals are a danger to the people, animals, nature  and environment. But nothing happens, because of the big money in the background.

     

    Therefore it's not surprising that the vast majority of poor farmers don't receive any education about the danger of these chemicals. Neither learning about the problem  at school, nor giving information by TV (but advertising!).

     

    The most annoying, the farmers seem to think that killing the vermin 3 times is better than one time. That means spraying the poison 3 times within a short time.

     

    Reporting to the village office is very dangerous. The officers seem to die for laughing.

    • Thanks 1
  9. On 9/8/2018 at 1:27 PM, PhonThong said:

    You are really showing your ignorance. Our drivers can earn $100,000 plus in their first year.

     <----------->

     You, should not respond to things you obviously know nothing about.

     

    You call me ignorant which is derived from the Latin word ignorare = not knowing. You would like to silence me with the fact that you cannot find a driver for your company earning +100,000$ in their first year. Or more than 8.000$ monthly. But I don't know, if „earning“ means gross or net in your case.


     

    After searching the internet, I have to believe that it isn't easy to find a driver for your company because of some state regulation. Therefore immigrants can't get the job, in general. I have to correct me.


     

    But internet also showed me that you gave me/us only a look at one side of the coin, the bright side. This salary maybe given in NYK, San Francisco, Palo Alto, Los Angeles, Boston, big cities etc. The dark side is the inflated prices of living in those/your locations. Especially rent an apartment i.e. with prices about 50% of the income or more. And possibly not near to the driver's residence.

     

    I've read in San Francisco a two-paycheck-couple isn't able to start a familiy because they belong to the low-income earners with an income of 10,350$ ! Furthermore, I have read in the Silicon Valey a coupe, she a lawyer, he a software-ingeneer, are not able to raise a family because of the „tremendous“ living costs.

     

    With the same income they would be kings/queens in the rust belt or Mississippi-delta where the yearly earning of 40,000§ is of „no need“. You can guess the daily costs are there much, much cheaper.


    I could ad more of these conflicting results. If this is true what I've read then you must admit that earning as much as +100,000$ yearly isn't the point if you are hit by inflation of the prices for goods and daily/monthly living in your residence. It's only a sign that it easier to gain a job at now. But it's not a sign that the poor and the middle class got richer. Getting richer ,means the net income must start upwards.


    Let's wait for some years. Then we can talk about this again.

  10. For many years in my life I wasn't interested in the background of the political life in the USA. This changed fundamentally since Trump appeared on the scene.

     

    I realized that the USA is comparable to a Swiss cheese – too many holes in the system. (it would be interesting and worthwhile to start a new threat about this point/s. I'm not allowed to open such a threat – TV rules!)

     

    The Supreme Court of the US is one of the holes in the US cheese. For many reasons:

    • The members of the most important court (in every state of the world) should be completely impartial and not party-orientated.

      • Therefore Cavanaugh shouldn't have any chance. His devotion to Trump and his former connection to the Reps don't guarantee his neutrality.

    • Because the judgments of the members in the Supreme Court have far-reaching consequences and impacts for the people of a state (i..e. abortion) there should be special procedures for the election of these important peoples. Among them

      • the candidate shouldn't be elected by the simple majority of the votes of Senate and House of R., but at least by a qualified majority of 60% or more in each chamber. This gives the guaranty that the member wouldn't be elected only because of his political (biased) view and conduct. The Reps had changed this to 50% from 60%(?) .

    • Manipulations shouldn't be allowed. Instead there should be a timely strong regulated procedure. Remember the vacancy of the ninth S.Judge during the last year of Obama. Unfair behavior by the Rep majority in the 2 Congress chambers, because there hasn't been a regulation.

    • In general, unlimited staying in the SC , once being elected.  Trump and his consorts will chose a young Rep so that the Rep-ideology will prevail for many, many years, even if there is a political change (although the selection of judges should NOT depend on a party ideology).

    • The list goes on

     

    One of the most awful and biased decisions of the SC concerned the election gift for the rich (money elite): the abolition of limited party donations. Out of my viewpoint this was one basic reason why money of people like Koch brothers etc. decided the outcome of the last (Trump) election. That money plays a role in elections …...... bah – and is against the proclaimed principle of equality.

  11. 2 hours ago, Jonnapat said:

    Obviously something to hide here.

    Witness the politicization of the US Supreme Court about to happen.

    Obama was not allowed a vote on his choice for 12 months due to Republican obstruction. 

    ....  and now they hurry up, afraid of the November-election results. Let me repeat it: SOP is now the deserved name for the Reps - Sordid Old Party. Own interests prevail.

     

    The Senate is one part of the Legislature and  therefore should serve the interests of the people, not those of a party or the Executive/ LOTUS (Liar Of The ....) for their own fortune re. future/job.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...