candide

The first sentence of the Politico article: "The White House released a readout of President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenski" Schiff presented an interpretation of the phone call in a speech, he never claimed it was the original text.

His return has been decided at a higher level than the military elite....

In Thailand, the government certainly doesn't control the NACC and the Judiciary. It's decided at another level.

China has no say on what is allowed or not in the U.S. They cannot "allow" a different set of speech. U.S regulations apply. Since the servers are in the U.S.

Since when is China promoting free speech and free thinking? Lol! Try to write Winny the Poo on Wechat when you are in China. If I have to be spied on by the U.S. only, or by both the U.S. and a fully authoritarian and rival State like China, I prefer to be spied by only by the U.S.

I know that. But the aim of the bill is not to increase censorship or surveillance (of course, TikTok is already spied by the NSA, just as Google). It's above removing the Chinese shareholder. Edit. It's not only the NSA. Since TikTok servers are located in the U.S. for U.S. users, its data is subject to the same laws as Google and others. It means that the U.S. agencies have the same access as with Google and others.

Have you ever looked at China trade statistics? And BRICS is neither an alliance nor a trade zone. The main trade partners of any BRICS country (apart from Russia) are NATO countries and allies. Here are the China trade statistics by country. http://english.customs.gov.cn/Statics/e1351568-5e17-4534-affd-c369e3506613.html

Oh, and I forgot to stress that the title of the OP (Schoolchildren are converting to Islam 'out of fear' in German schools: Study warns) is misleading. In the BZ original article, the title is that a member of security forces sayd that, not that the study stated it.

B.S. That's not the issue. The issue is about removing the Chinese shareholder, not about censoring Riot on.

Complete B.S.! And Blinken would be antisemitic? Are you really that ignorant? 😅

China's trade is dominantly with NATO countries and allies such as Japan, SK, OZ, etc.... and the U.S. is the first trade partner.

Thanks for the picture! I understand better now! 😁

The phone call was recorded. 😆 https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770

See my post above.

As I expected, it originates from the BildZeitung! 🤣 https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/staatsschuetzer-schlaegt-alarm-deutsche-kinder-konvertieren-aus-angst-zum-islam-66264176841ad84a3ea833d8?ticket=ST-A-34005-aWLqrudJ1ATAG5bZwXue-sso-signin-server The Daily Mail (which is the source of the OP) added an extra level of distortion and confusion, as it tends to presents statements by an anonymous "Staatschutzer" in a way they can be confused with findings of the study. the Daily Mail also doesn't highlights that it was a survey among Muslim students. Gosh, the Daily Mail has even less professional ethics that the Bildzeitung. 😆 Oh and It's also written in the BZ that the sample is not representative.

It's not a real election of Senators, rather a selection, and the government is not involved in it. It will likely be controlled by the old elite.

Come on! You don't remember the name of a poster to whom you replied two months ago!

And it's not like you would have mentioned 91 crimes... 😀

Right. He's more talented than Bignok/Dolf was.

Anyone noticed that right-wingers and conspiracy theorists are supporting the ownership of TikTok by a Chinese company? 😀

If you don't know the charges, look by yourself instead of asking other posters to waste time doing it. It's a lame trolling tactic.

Again.

Trolling traps!

B.S. This is not about censoring TikTok, it's about removing the Chinese shareholder!

I forgot about it! What a bunch of morons! 😆 Here's the video. They called it "the signing" 🤣