candide

Pathetic, indeed! She was cited....by Trump! 😀 😀 "Trump has long claimed that he requested the National Guard but that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., failed to act on the request."

Lol! That's what Loudermilk said, not Ornato! 😀 This is becoming pathetic.... Ornato said: "I remember he had – he was on the phone with [Bowser], and we – I had walked in for something, and I was there, and he was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed. Because I think it was the concern of anti and pro groups clashing is what I recall. And not anywhere near the Capitol, this was just out on the mall area or at the event; and wanted to know if she needed any more guardsmen," Ornato responded, according to the transcript reviewed by Fox News Digital. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report

So which classified information has been published in the book "Promise Me, Dad,” ? 😀

Fair point

I checked in your linked source. Pelosi is never mentioned. (Which makes sense as she had never been in charge of security at the Capitol). I showed a quote from Ornato's testimony, from the Fox News article. He said: "And not anywhere near the Capitol, this was just out on the mall area or at the event" I find it funny that MAGA's sources confirm Trump was lying (if needed). He did ask for the national guard's support but: - it was not to protect the protest, - and Pelosi was not inolved

Ahem! So the one who bows to Putin is strong, and the one who opposes Putin is weak....

Wasn't it you complaining about no proof, data or links provided....in your previous post? 😁

It was never meant to be a real investigation, just a way to publicly smear Joe Biden. And the propaganda campaign is not over. They will make baseless criminal referrals Which will be rejected by the DOJ for lack of evidence, and then they will accuse the DOJ of being politicised.

You wrote: And there are recent reports that Trump did, in fact, offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol (via Mark Meadows) but this was turned down (apparently by Pelosi and Bowser). 1. It was not Pelosi "Loudermilk on Friday released a transcript of Ornato’s interview with the committee that details how he allegedly overheard then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows asking D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as much protection for D.C. as she needed." 2. It was not the Capitol "I remember he had – he was on the phone with [Bowser], and we – I had walked in for something, and I was there, and he was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed. Because I think it was the concern of anti and pro groups clashing is what I recall. And not anywhere near the Capitol, this was just out on the mall area or at the event; and wanted to know if she needed any more guardsmen," Ornato responded, according to the transcript reviewed by Fox News Digital. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report Corroborated by Miller's testimony https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congresswoman-says-trump-administration-botched-capitol-riot-preparations-2021-05-12/ So it confirms Trump was lying. Not Pelosi and not the Capitol

Yes. It's much more efficient.

A video? Come back when you have a written article which can be analysed.

And Putin never fails to remind Trump who's the master and who's the bitch! 😀 Putin Recalls Trump Acting Like Jealous GF in Private https://www.yahoo.com/news/putin-recalls-trump-acting-jealous-102358021.html

Tell Trump!

Sure! The real domestic enemy is not the one who tried to steal a fair and free election (Trump, in case you did not notice). 😀 (And also happens to be Putin's bitch, BTW) ,

RINO, blah blah, as usual.

Good question. Why did they block it despite a bipartisan Senate proposal? 😀 They don't want to resolve this issue so that they can go on whining about it!

Lame deflection. Even according to Fox News, you were wrong! 😀

He is just parroting Kerry Lake's claims!

Another conspiracy theory! It seems that's all you have!

Lo!. Fox News recently publicised a testimony showing that: - Trump asked for National Guard not to protect the Capitol, but to protect the protest (already disclosed in wmiley's testimony- - Pelosi was not involved in the decision. Check here! 😀 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report

Remind us which party is curently blocking funding? 😀

Another fact-free statement... https://www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekers

The other alternative MAGA tactic when confronted with facts (apart from conspiracy theories): false equivalence.

No one is neutral. However, some people rely on facts to express opinions (such as evidence shown in court), other people rely on conspiracy theories. It's blatantly obvious that when you have no real argument, you stick to conspiracy theories.

It's always been the same guy claiming elections have been rigged by voter fraud. Trump did it when Obama was reelected, before the 2016 elections, after the 2016 elections, and again in 2020. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-longstanding-history-calling-elections-rigged-doesnt-results/story?id=74126926