candide

It's pale compared to his pal Kim who has a 100% approval rate! 😃

It's funny how some posters are trying to hide the economic failure of Putin's Russia behind the success of other BRICS countries, in particular China. Russia’s Negligible GDP Growth Contrasts Sharply with China’s Massive Advance China’s GDP has risen by over 624% in the last 25 years, compared with an increase of 127% in Russia. https://www.worldeconomics.com/Thoughts/Chinas-GDP-Growth-Leaves-Other-BRICs-Member-Russia-Standing.aspx

Directly fed from the Russian propaganda.... You forgot to mention the Nazi Ukrainians! 😄

Biden's FB? It's ridiculous. Most of the events evoked by the IRS so-called whistleblowers actually occurred under Trump! 😆

That's the technology they likely use in Russia. 😀

Is invading a country in order to annex it (or part of it) the same as the examples you give?

At the end of Obama's fiscal year (Sept. 2017), it was 4.2. Trump inherited a decreasing trend from Obama and it went on under Trump. It's not like the trend was flat and suddenly decreased under Trump. Trump was surfing on Obama's waves from his last mandate, doing a bit better on growth, a bit worse on inflation, a bit worse on debt, and a bit worse on unemployment reduction rate (which as you noticed, is not unusual, curves usually get more flat as they approach the minimum or maximum values).

You are assuming that Putin always reacts rationally.

How does it exonerate Putin?

It "can", except that it didn't.

I agree with you about the war in Irak. However I don't know about "Brandon" having started a war. Could the sanctions be considered as illegal? That can be discussed. However, it's certainly a pale sin compared to a country coercing another country by invading it and bombing its population. If one cannot even invade another country without being sanctioned.... 😀

"Illegal sanctions"? What about the illegal war started by Putin?

Ok. He may have been manipulated.

What has it to do with the case you mentioned? More incoherence?

There's powder spilled on a carpenter's workbench and on the floor around it. Is it logical to think it's brown cocaine?

You think it won't be confirmed by the doctor and the carpenter?

More precisely, "officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story” to him about Hunter Biden. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.167064/gov.uscourts.nvd.167064.15.0.pdf

Right, it has been quite resilient so far. It doesn't change the fact that Russia's GDP is only at around Italy's level and did not grow between 2013 and 2022. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/RUS/russia/gdp-gross-domestic-product

Right. Putin only failed to grow his country's GDP per capita between 2013 and 2022. Russia is an economic dwarf, Putin failed to develop the Russian economy.

It seems you are at least a bit informed about drugs. You never joked with flour or sugar lines? From the OP: Further unraveling the narrative, it was revealed that the photo was taken by a master carpenter, who, himself a former cocaine addict, orchestrated the shot as a symbolic message of overcoming addiction. The image was sent to Biden by his psychiatrist, Dr. Keith Ablow, as a source of inspiration, highlighting the power of redemption and personal transformation.

One of the main issue is the absence of a project, and most of all which could rally the British people, and even only the Brexiteers. The only ones who have a clear project are the proponents of ultra-liberal economics (i.e. Singapore on Thames). However it is not able to rally the "left behind" component of Brexiteers. So there is hardly a project, and certainly not a project shared by all Brexiteers. It's actually more like navigate by visual....

Because now we know Smirnov was working for the Russians. Was it also Russian intelligence which directly or indirectly informed the GOP about the existence of the FD form?

On top of it, his claim is not coherent with the data shown. If "all traders" knew she was doing insider trading, there would have been a spike after this purchase.

And That's your proof? 😅 May I ask what the insider information was? 😁 BTW. You are certainly not a trader either! If you were a trader, you would know they are informed of such purchases. If "all traders" knew she does insider trading, they would have rushed to do the same and the stock price would have increased in the next days. Instead of that it went down a little bit during the next days after she bought shares (according to the graph posted).

So you've been regularly posting on Biden's documents topic, and you don't even know what's written in the special counsel's report. 😃