Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by candide

  1. *Deleted post edited out* Of course, It's complex to analyse and what you mention is a good example of how it can be misused. Actually one issue was that Romney did not release 5 years of tax returns as the others did, he released only two years. In particular, the last year was missing. The problem was that he did not initially release enough tax returns to debunk Reid's claim. (That's how the WaPo article you linked debunks his claim, by looking at the other tax returns). https://www.abc.net.au/news/specials/us-election-2012/2012-09-22/mitt-romney-reveals-2011-tax-return/4275266 Additionally, it seems that Romney has since become a fan of releasing tax returns! ???? https://www.npr.org/2016/05/11/477700943/mitt-romney-trumps-decision-to-not-release-tax-returns-is-disqualifying BTW, which precise "cash" to presidential candidates are you not targeting?
  2. I checked the Taste Atlas website. According to them, the five best rated dishes of all kind worldwide are, by order, pizza, pastel de Belen and nasi parang, butter garlic Nan and yakiniku! Obviously a gourmet only website! ????
  3. Yes, definitely. In particular, she would have been tough from the start with China. https://www.politico.eu/article/trump-on-chinas-xi-we-love-each-other/
  4. It could start with making the disclosure of their tax returns mandatory. Of course, I am not targeting anyone! ????
  5. Excellent factual post! As you already know, don't expect these facts will be taken into account by this poster.
  6. Not two years, one year! And why one year? Because no copy was given before to another media than the NYPost. Complain about it to Giuliani! At this time, it had all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation (Giuliani known for contacts with Russian operatives., copy only given to NYPost, experience of 2016 elections). Anyway, Comer has nothing, as he himself said: “It is unclear what services were provided to obtain this exorbitant amount of money". Only blah, blah! Show the goods or shut up, Comer!
  7. That's the eternal problem with some MAGA posters. They are told they need to link sources so they quickly link some articles without really reading them.
  8. Do you have some reliable information about how risky it is (for the Chinese)? Knowing them, I wouldn't bet they took much risk without guarantors and/or a significant interest rate, ex. the railway project.
  9. Well, in some countries, not having tight ethical contrainsts may be an advantage for the Chinese, at least on short-term. However, on a longer term, they may be perceived as a neo-colonialist country by the local populations.
  10. The Chinese have been very smart in articulating their influence policy. For example, the belt and road is a brilliant marketing and communication initiative. The U.S., and also European countries are lacking such a coherent and highly visible policy (while they probably spend more than the Chinese. Anyway, they are also starting that it's not all nice with the Chinese. For example, read: https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/areas-in-africa-with-more-chinese-backed-projects-were-more-likely-to-experience-protests
  11. “It is unclear what services were provided to obtain this exorbitant amount of money". In brief, he has nothing.
  12. It's not comparable at all. Trump is not being investigated for sex crime.
  13. And some people are arguing that NATO was a threat to Russia.....
  14. Bonkers predictions? ???? The current climate change is following the forecasts made during the early 2000's Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/
  15. Turkey, that was during the 60's. It has nothing to do with the post-Soviet NATO policy.
  16. It's impressive how he fought the swamp by being pro-big business, i.e. by giving tax cuts to the rich.... not to mention his shameless nepotism.
  17. NATO was not a threat to Russia. There was no intent to attack or threaten Russia. Putin is a sore loser. He cannot accept this simple fact: no European country wants to be associated with Russia. One reason being that he failed to develop his country and Russia has no soft power. Another is that they have suffered from Russian (and Soviet) imperialism in the past The Iraq war was different but it doesn't really matter. Everybody would agree with you that it was not a "good war". It was a scam war. Even at that time, several NATO countries were against it (ex. France). Both invasions are horrendous.
  18. There isn't any NATO policy to put nukes near Russia borders. Currently there are U.S. nukes only in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey, plus France and UK have their own nukes. Apart from Turkey, they are not close to Russia, I.e. not in Poland, Hungary, Baltic states, etc...
  19. An obvious conflict of interest. I guess the GOP committee has now buried the investigation. They seem to focus only on non-conflict of interest cases.
  20. He's already starting the circus. This is going to be entertaining! ???? “THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!,” https://nypost.com/2023/03/18/donald-trump-says-he-will-be-arrested-tuesday/ (Sorry mod for the caps, that's the original text)
  21. By Marco Polo, founded by Garrett Ziegler, a 26-year-old former Trump White House aide! ????
  22. They have relied extensively on copying western technology, but have also significantly improved their domestic R&D capabilities. They have followed a path which is similar to Japan or SK, and now have reached the domestic innovation stage in many domains. On top of it, there are many people, so it's not that difficult to extract enough top scientists and engineers from such a mass of people. Not to mention a captive market which is huge enough to make investment profitable. t's just a question of time and they are fast.
  23. Tucker Carlson on Tuesday gave viewers an economical snapshot of two of his biggest lies. “Jan. 6, I think, is probably second only to the 2020 election as the biggest scam in my lifetime,” the Fox News host said. ???? https://news.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-packages-2-biggest-125955212.html
×
×
  • Create New...