candide

I wouldn't bet all of it has been spend wisely (the government was not particularly competent), but it has likely allowed the survival of the UK economy, you know like preventing the health system to collapse, preventing businesses from going bankrupt, preventing people from having to sell their house at any price by necessity, etc....

Come on! The EU is applying the agreement negotiated by BoJo. There is nothing exceptional about it. It's the same rules the UK was actually applying to third countries while it was in the EU. It's also the same rules the UK is currently applying to third countries, as most EU laws have been retained. Of course, for Brexiteers, It's always someone else's fault (usually the EU),

And also claimed they had been planted by the FBI! ????

Have you read the article? It doesn't show the FBI is a corrupt establishment.

It seems you have some reading and/or understanding problems. The emails were about the creation of a joint-venture, and it was asked whether the Big Guy may take 10% of it. When you become a shareholder of a JV, you don't receive money, you invest in his capital. Furthermore, the JV has effectively been created. It is not a secret operation, the JV must be registered, and Joe has not been a shareholder of the JV. Finally, there is no evidence this JV has been involved in anything illegal. It is also not evil per se to partner with Chinese companies. Thousands of JVs with Chinese companies have been created, included by Trump.

More lies, more B.S., more checks! It's simple!

You are completely incoherent again. Biden could not have ordered the FBI to do it. The President was Trump and the DOJ was headed by Barr.

And Jim Jordan may have secret whistleblowers who could confirm it! ????

Exactly, not much to do. Unlike Hunter, Kushner was a WH official involved in ME policy, so there is a clear conflict of interest in this case.

So no pay, no play according to your source. No pay: Hunter got a 5m loan (actually it came out that the recipient company did not belong to him, but never mind). Joe did not get any payment. He was also not shareholder of the JV (which would have been no problem anyway, as he was a private citizen) No play: the Chinese energy company was not involved with the U.S. government (ex did not get any contract or licence) so absolutely no possibility for pay. On top of it, when it happened, It was in 2017, so there was even less possibility. In brief, they have nothing

Play what?

There has been an official investigation into Hunter for years, and they are currently investigating all his financial data as he is already suspected of tax fraud. If the Republicans have true witnesses (and not Jim Jordan's style B.S.), they only need to direct them to the investigators. As mentioned by bild766, It's all B.S. about what they "may" have. ????

Exactly. No relation, for two reasons. Joe Biden is not being investigated, and has publicised his tax returns

The treasury has rejected a request to copy the files, however, it is not forbidden to House reps. to consult the files. And what did they found? Nothing.

You are getting it the wrong way. They don't need to show they are not compromised (and Joe is not concerned anyway). It must be proven they are compromised. It's currently being officially investigated for years (by a Republican). There's no need for a ridiculous Jim Jordan show.

Storm in a teacup....

The French could advise a radical way to do it! ????

I am not polluting anything. Sorry to break your scoop but this about the fact that Pelosi opened the door. There is nothing new about it and It's been known for days. This fact was already displayed in the first affidavit on 31 October, which is still accessible on the DOJ website. It has also been largely diffused by the media.This is an official document, not a draft. They knew it and published it, and it has not been withdrawn. It cannot be more clearly stated: "e. DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it." https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/man-charged-assault-and-attempted-kidnapping-following-breaking-and-entering-pelosi-residence (The link to the document is on the DOJ page) They knew it. Your explanation that they got it wrong doesn't stand, Why didn't they recall it in the latest filing? That's the question.

You mentioned the Biden/Burisma/Shokin conspiracy and It's been debunked. From what I know, there's nothing new about it in the laptop. As about the emails, the JV has been created, the shareholders are known, and Joe is not one of them. On top of it, it happened while Trump and the GOP were managing the country, so Joe was a private citizen at this time. Hunters business dealings and its financial aspects are currently being investigated (by a Republican), so no need for the Senate to get involved, unless for political motives.

Without a proper plan on who should leave the company, really? The problem, as you surely know, is that when such offers (or threats) are made, It's usually the good people who leave the company, the ones who can easily get another job because they are competent and efficient. And from the OP, That's what they do: leave!

It's not illegal to leave and It's not illegal to make a boat trip with friends along the coast (half joking) The most obvious reason to stop them is safety, if the boat is overloaded etc.... The core issue is that there are thousands of attempts, so It's impossible to stop them all.

They have nothing

Debunked already. Already covered by the GOP Senate investigation4 years ago.

I never said I had any esteem for Hunter. He's parasiting his familly name. He's currently under investigation and If he deserves to be punished, so be it. By the way, I had a look at the "suspect" company mentioned in the article (Hills International): a large established company involved in many international projects, including in the middle East. Nothing suspect in getting a contract in Irak.with this pedigree. https://www.hillintl.com/

I forgot James. That's old stuff. It doesn't justify a new investigation.