johnnybangkok
-
Posts
2,979 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Posts posted by johnnybangkok
-
-
- Popular Post
6 minutes ago, evadgib said:I may just as well have posted in Swahili
If you meant something else then say so. Your post says '20k died with the virus rather than from it', well doh............ the point is how many years could they have lived if it wasn't for Covid. I'm guessing..................more.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, JAG said:Or even, perish the thought, an open enquiry into every aspect of the problems and shortcomings exposed by the pandemic. Why were we unprepared, were we unprepared compared to other countries, what were the physical, environmental, climatic, demographic and medical conditions which meant that its effects differed from other countries. These are all issues which need to be examined. Perhaps it could concentrate on what led to the pandemic, how we reacted as a nation, and what lessons could be learned. Once that has been covered, I'm sure that you can have a couple of days to shout at Boris and the Tories!
I'll answer it for you now. Sheer incompetance.
We haven't got an idiot recommending injecting ourselves with disinfectant but we are not far off. The WHO declares C19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (the highest alert it can issue) on the 30th January which in turn has procedures and recommendations that should be adhered to (https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/pheic/en/). These were ignored. All through February, numbers kept climbing with Italy closing towns by the end of February. Boris went to England v Wales rugby match at Twickenham on 7 March. The WHO declared Covid a pandemic on the 11th March but it still took Boris and the Tories until the 18 March to announce the closure of all schools until further noticed, with pubs and restaurants ordered to shut on 20 March. Everything since then has just been one bad judgement and phony excuse after the other. It's an absolute debacle which in normal/better times would should have ensured Boris's resignation.
He's just lucky he's got Trump taking all the clown flack.
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, evadgib said:The short answer is no I don't, yet this pandemic is similar to a tsunami when it comes to planning & UK wouldn't have a clue how to react there either although would catch up within a similar timeframe.
As for the death toll; I am of the opinion that the 20k died with the virus rather than from it and that quite a few had underlying conditions as explained. The '500k' prediction has long since proved to be pie-in-the-sky, & the Nightingale hospitals are near empty.
You all make this seem like it was some big surprise. That no one knew there was a chance of a pandemic; like swine flu hadn't happened, that avain flu was just a myth, that MERS was fiction, SARS, HiN1 and ebola were all just fake news.
The pandemic threat has been around for an awfully long time and so has the answer; Test, identify, track and isolate. Do it quick, do it early. Don't be in a position where you can't protect your fist responders, your nurses, your doctors, your essential workers. This is not me reinventing the wheel. This is common procedure. Yet this government decided to dilly and daly over their 'herd immunity' debacle and it soon became apparant that they were no where near capable of testing on mass admitting 'that none of the 17.5m antibody tests it ordered in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic work well enough to be used' (https://www.ft.com/content/f28e26a0-bf64-4fac-acfb-b3a618ca659d).
As previosly mentionerd, S. Korea and Taiwan got it right. Why the hell didn't we?
Oh and by the way, happy to see your 'they were on their way anyway, all Covid did was give them a push' musings. Says everything really.
- 5
- 1
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, evadgib said:Cometh the hour...
They've flung the kitchen sink at him since December and won't stop until his primary task has been completed. In the meantime he'll be distracted separating fact from fiction re this virus.
Do you genuinely think Boris and the tories have done a good job with this?
Both S. Korea and Taiwan have shown how to handle this pandemic through early testing, identifying and isolating which in turn has led to low rates of infection and (relatively) few deaths. The Tory government were warned about this way back in January and dragged their heals through firstly their herd-immunity debacle (before they realised that 200-400,000 people were likely to die) and then their lack-lustre approach to testing and providing much needed protection for front-line staff (still to be solved). Even now their much vaunted 100,000 tests per day is nowhere near realisation and it's only thanks to self-isolation and the 'British spirit' that this virus has at least been limited to 'only' 20,000 deaths.
The UK is supposed to be a world leader in science and scientific facilities yet seems to have been caught completely unawares with a pandemic that EVERYONE has been warning of for years as a matter of when not if.
Once this all calms down then I believe an open enquiry needs to be held to hold the Tories and Boris to task over why the Uk was so ill-prepared for this, why so many had to die and why so many will be financially ruined through the governments actions (or lack of).
- 4
-
16 minutes ago, Logosone said:
When the virus came nobody had the capacity for testing. Nobody. However as soon as the virus genome was published a single German company produced 1.4 million test kits in 4 weeks, South Korean companies produced a great number of test kits.
The UK could have done the same. UK biotech companies were offering their tests, but PHE refused to use them.
There is now a reliable antibody test the UK has put in a huge order for.
So even the UK now has the capacity for mass testing. Has the UK government ended the lockdown? No.
To continue to isolate the healthy from the healthy while destroying and ruining the economy is madness. It's not rational thinking.
Wrong.
On 16 January, the South Korean biotech executive Chun Jong-yoon grasped the reality unfolding in China and directed his lab to work to stem the virus’s inevitable spread; within days, his team developed detection kits now in high demand around the world (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/20/south-korea-rapid-intrusive-measures-covid-19).
We have gone over this so many times it's beginning to sound like a broken record. We both agree that testing, identifying and isolating is the best way to combat this virus but where we differ is what to do if you CAN'T test. You think it should be 'business as usual' often quoting the Swedish model, whereas I and many others (including most governemnts and top experts) believe the if it wasn't for self-isolation, this virus would have run amok and deaths in the UK and other countries would be in their 100's of thousand rather than the 10's of thousands it currently is.
The UK and other countries are desperately trying to ramp up testing because they know they have been sorely lacking in this area as both S. Korea and Taiwan have shown the benefit of early detection and rapid response BUT as stated many, many, many times, there's no use crying over spilled milk. The damage has already been done and the only way to mitigate the deaths is isolation.
Heads will roll though as a country like the UK with some of the best medical facilities and medical professionals in the world should have been much better preapred for this.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Logosone said:
The difference with drink driving is very obvious.
A drunk driver is intoxicated. With isolation of the healthy the opposite is the case, the healthy and unaffected are asked to self-isolate.
Hardly the same thing. What is being asked is more like asking EVERYONE not to drive because a small percentage maybe drunk and there may be accidents. Most people can see the lunacy in this approach.
If you want to test the healhty, by all means do so. If they then test positive for SARS Cov2, by all means isolate them.
Don't isolate the healthy from the healthy. It's madness.
And the difference with all the other suggestions I've made? Or are you just going to cherry pick that one?
My point was in reply to a suggestion that everyone is adult enough to 'do the right thing'. If that's correct then we wouldn'ty need laws or regulations or oversight or anything else that keeps society together.
- 1
-
44 minutes ago, runamok27 said:
As more data pours in the, the scientific data as you call it, the projections and the reality is changing rapidly. If you are going to believe the science when it leads to dire predictions of death and destruction why would you not believe the science when it doesn't lead to dire predictions of death and destruction? The science started with predictions of 10's maybe even 100's of millions of deaths, then it went to just millions, then just hundreds of thousands. The science once again predicted a death rate of 10%+, then it was 5%, then it was 3%, then it was 2% now it's about 1% and change but other studies are being done that are saying that the infection rate could be 50 to 80 times higher then the reported infection rate. Those numbers would bring the fatality rate down way below 1%, in fact, it brings it down to the regular flu and below. I find it funny that people tout the science when it agrees with them but disregards the science when it doesn't.
You shoud be thanking self-isolation then. THATS whats kept the figures down. If left to it's own devices deaths could have certainly been in the millions.
And flu kills between 250-500,000 people worldwide per year (https://www.medscape.com/answers/219557-3459/what-is-the-global-incidence-of-influenza). That works out at between 20,000 and 41,000 per month. So far Covid has killed approx. 200,000 (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?" \l "countries) in the space of 2 months WITH lockdown. Also, mortality through flu is widely accepted as 0.1%, so even at 1% (a hotly disputed number), that meakes C19 10 times deadlier than the flu.
Why are you people not getting this? It's really not that difficult.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
Oh excellent news. I think the majority of the UK will now be happy that such a competant, intelligent and bastion of the NHS will now be back at the helm of the Covid crisis.
Apart from the 20,000 dead of course.
- 4
- 1
- 2
-
7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:
So, what happens when all the people with no immunity are allowed to mingle with the inevitable carriers and the second wave occurs?
Is your plan to lockdown every time the death rate increases?
If a vaccine is 12 to 18 months away, there will probably be zero economy by then, and people will be dying from the lockdowns.
I'm for doing what they did in 1918.
Letting 50 million die? Great plan.
No one is talking about locking down for 12 to 18 months. Stop being so hysterical and cherry picking a narrative that suits your purpose. Anyone with half a modicum of sense understands that self-isolation was always going to be a temporary measure until the numbers of infected stabilised THEN a gentle easing of the lockdown would ensue to ensure the current wave and likely second wave wouldn't overwhelm health services and cause even more deaths. This would also give governments time to increase the testing, identifying and isolating of the infected (by far the most effected way to combat this virus and where governments have been sorely lacking) thus not making an already bad pendemic even worse.
I'm really not sure why this is so difficult to understand but I suppose all you 'independent thinkers' who 'risk unpopularity by not going with the majority' are the knights in shining armour, battling 'the man' for the good of humanity and we really should be listened to you instead of actual professionals who do this for a living. I mean, apart from our lives, what have we got to lose?
- 1
-
7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:
It's called treating people as being adults responsible for their own actions. Those that wish to isolate are entirely able to do so on their own, without the nanny state treating us like we are all incompetents that have to be locked up whether it is necessary or not.
Great idea. And why we're at it why don't we just let people drink drive? Or not wear seat belts or decide what medical treatment they should/shouldn't have or whether they send their kids to school or pay/not pay their taxes or obey/not obey the law?
I mean they are all responsible adults so I can't see how it could go wrong.
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, chessman said:I think (almost) everybody is suffering at the moment - but I think you overestimate the number of people who are not worrying about the things your write about. There should be checks and balances, if my country (the UK) was more democratic then it is likely that the current restrictions would actually have happened sooner. That could have saved 1000s of lives. Currently, in opinion polls, these measures also seem to have majority support. Same in the USA.
Of course it is not convenient in the long term, but things are already changing. European countries are beginning to open up bit by by bit. There is more and more data available and we can make better decisions driven by that data. I believe the case at the start for strict lockdowns was very good, we wanted to avoid healthcare systems being overwhelmed, we wanted to find out more about the virus, improve our ability to test. We've done that now and things will begin to change. They've already begun to change. I see quite a lot of people misinterpreting phrases like 'things won't get back to normal for a while' and thinking that means 'things will stay exactly like this for a while'. Clearly the 1st does not mean the 2nd.
One of the best things I have read about this crisis is called the hammer and the dance.
https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-the-hammer-and-the-dance-be9337092b56
If you have time, I strongly recommend it.
It certainly will be interesting to see what happens.
Good read and a very convincing argument for self-isolation
- 3
-
19 minutes ago, TheFishman1 said:
I wish I had a dollar for every time Trump lies
You would be $16,241 richer....and counting.
- 2
-
18 hours ago, chessman said:
172 reported new deaths yesterday. That is the the much more important statistic, as you know.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
The number '5' will be adjusted to a much higher total in the next few days and is only so low because of a lag in reporting , as you know.
You think these kind of comparisons skew against Sweden because of it's tiny population? Ridiculous! More than 10 million people there.
You seem very dogmatic with this, Sweden must be correct, the UK must have been wrong...
The honest answer is we don't know. If Sweden had taken a different path it would very likely have figures similar to Denmark, Norway and Finland.
Will the economy in Sweden be in significantly better shape than the other Nordic counties when this is over? We don't know
Will Sweden do better when/if there is a second wave because people there have more immunity? We don't know.
You are too sure of yourself
Of course he is very dogmatic about this as Sweden feeds into his echo chamber of the 'best' way to do this i.e. no self-isolation and let the chips fall as they may. If Sweden starts showing higher levels of contagion and lots of deaths then obviously the correct way was self-isolation and a full week of forcing his opinion on us TV readers vwill have to be followed by a 'I'm soooo sorry. I got this wrong. Self-isolation was the correct thing to do and I'll take back everything I said'. (which is obviously going to happen)
- 2
-
13 hours ago, Stargrazer9889 said:
I have noticed that when a lots of e smokers blow out their white vapor clouds, that
is what they do. They blow out their breath, not just breath out naturally.
For the posters who have not seen this, they must either be blind, or maybe
they are the e smokers. I have always hated seeing smokers, or e smokers doing this, while
likely thinking somehow that their action is cool, or hip, or some other
delusion.
Geezer
May I suggest you take them quietly to the side and ask them if this is the first time they've ever smoked/vaped as they are obviously doing some mad version of the norm
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Logosone said:
They're parroting me. I'm on record here very early on, saying consistently that the pandemic will not be as bad as some feared, saying that mortality rate was closer to 0.3%, that social distancing does not work, that there is an overreaction. And that is undeniably the case.
I'm not really concerned about the comedy show Trump puts on, that's an American issue, I'm not American. I'm just a fair minded German, and as you know therefore I have to speak the truth. Germans don't lie. That is well known. No matter how uncomfortable the truth.
I'm afraid your characterisation of Trumps effort is caricature at best. Sure he made mistakes and said some silly things. However, he closed the US for flights from China long before the EU did, against WHO advice. The late testing response was due to the CDC, not him. The poor hospital landscape in the US is not due to him. Trump actually made less mistakes than Merkel, Macron etc., his response was flawed but less so than the response of other leaders.
If you think I care about Republican advice, or want to denigrate liberals or democrats you're quite wrong.
I just call it how I see it.
Congratulations, you are now ahead of the right-wing media with your 'the pandemic will not be as bad as some feared'. I hate to break this to you but it IS that bad and continues to get worse.
Hopefully the self-isolation that you so detest will slow it's spread long enough for established methods of testing, identifying and isolating to take effect.
And saying about Trump; 'Sure he made mistakes and said some silly things' is like saying Atilla The Hun was a nice guy who was just misunderstood.'
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, Logosone said:
I don't think so.
We have seen precisely the opposite, that de-centralised responses like the ones in Germany were more successful than centralised attempts like those in London or Paris.
Equally in the US when Trump tried to assert central primacy over the reponse to the pandemic it turned out it was the governors who were best placed to deal with their respective outbreaks and Trump backed off.
Of course what you are describing in the US has happened almost to the letter in the UK or Germany as well.
Your characterisation of Trump's effort is a mere caricature of what actually happened though.
As for your prediction that nationalism will not make a come-back, I think that's way off. Most of the people in every country see this virus as having been brought by outsiders. It has already, and will continue to incite nationalism and hatred of foreigners. This is unavoidable.
Let me ask you something then Logosone. You are now all parroting the right-wing media with your 'open up society' solution to this problem but did you also agree with them when they first of all called it 'nothing to worry about' or 'it's no worse than the flu' or 'it's all under control' or that cracker 'it's a Democratic hoax'?
I mean they have been wrong on every count for literally months until under a barrage of evidence they quickly changed their tune to reflect the severity of the situation and eventually got behind the idea that this might be quite serious.
If someone was telling me the exact opposite of the reality of a situation then I think I might be sceptical of any further 'advice' they might provide but you guys are just still backing any and all of the 'solutions' they are championing.
Where do you draw the line or do yopu n ot care as long as you are 'owning the libs'.?
-
1 hour ago, AussieBob18 said:
What you have written is classic anti-Trump anti-right wing emotion and feelings. There is nothing in there that I can see but your feelings and emotions - and of course personal insults against those who disagree with the total panic and economic shutdowns. I was corrected by one person who was left-wing but agreed with me - he pointed out that some lefties were against the lockdowns and economic destruction - but I must state now that the vast majority of 'pro' lockdowns are lefties.
Sorry what I and many others have said has upset you - but the people of the 'free' world are turning 'right' - Trump and Brexit were just the beginning. The world is turning against globalism and centralised controls by unelected bureaucrats (UN, EU, etc.). Sorry but Patriotism and Nationalism is coming back - what country do you support at the Olympics or the Football World Cup? The fact is that left wing liberal ideals have been failing for a long time, and this Covid pandemic and the response, has made more people wake up and see how badly left wing ideals have affected people's lives.
But what I would like you to take away from my post/response is just one thing. I want you to note that the vast majority of statements about this pandemic by like minded people as myself, are not personal attacks and personal insults against people who disagree with us. You may think what I wrote above is personal, but it is not. However, the vast majority of statements made by people like minded with yourself are very personal. Take a step back - look at the facts logically and without emotion or feeling - then form your own opinion and then express it without insulting those who express different opinions.
And what you have written is classic Trump, Fox, OANN, Rush Limbaugh right wing propaganda. I only wish right wing anti-golbalists would have an original thought in their head other than blindly follow the obvious misinformation spewing out of the right wing media.
If anything the Covid crisis has shown that a cohesive, centralised government with established instituations that predict and handle major events such as this are more important than ever. Trump has shown the downside of shutting down your pandemic department, not listening to the experts and going your own way. There was ample time to get the American house in order but a solid month of first ignoring it, then denying it, then minimising it and even joking about it has left the USA in a terrible state with C19. Trump called it a Democratic hoax, spread false information about the severity, blamed the Obama administration and championed untested and potentially dangerous cures. His lack of federal guidance has left states in a mish-mash of solutions, with some backing self-isolation whilst others don't. States are having to bid against each other for essential supplies and even now, testing (which we have all agreed is the way forward) is no-where near the level it needs to be to contain the virus. Against all scientific advice Trump pushed for the country to be open by Easter, then the end of April and now mid-May. He has actively encouraged people to gather in numbers with no social distancing with his 'liberate Minnesota", "liberate Michigan" and "liberate Virginia" nonsense whilst still perpetuating his 'it's no worse than the flu' doctrine that his cult followers are still following. His Captain Chaos approach has lead to the highest rate of infections recorded by any country and 42,500 deaths (and counting). His 'press conferences' are still full of misinformation, self-congratulations and downright lies and resemble a Trump rally more than the information and leadership role it's supposed to play. The man is a walking disister but his cult followers are either blind to all this or so willfully ignorant that they continue to preach his ludicrous notions of 'less government' and 'freedom is more important than death'.
I will predict that after all this, the world will do exactly the opposite of what you say and embrace globalism in the knowledge we are all in this together whilst insisting on more centralised controls so this can never happen again.
As my previous posts have hopefully demonstarted, I am no 'left-wing liberal' as I don't think it's particularly helpful for right wingers to continually bring up the left/right debate (which you all do at every opportunity). I don't think it's important to put labels on people when we can all suffer the same fate, but I will say that the vast majority of the misinformation being thrown around right now is from right-wing media not the 'fake news' your beloved leader likes to demonise so much. And as much as you bemoan the UN, the EU and I'm sure the WHO, they are some of the only voices of reason in a sea of downright stupidity.
And no, patriotism and nationalism isn't coming back for the vast majority of people because we can all clearly see that patriotism and nationalism are just badly marketed excuses for hatred and isolation. They're there to stoke further division and hatred of others, just because they're not in your 'gang'.
As I said in a previous post, your first post was well thought out and provided a solution of which I wholeheartedly agree (and marked a vast change in tone and content from your previous posts) but you keep spoiling it with your unblinking defence of governments and individuals who are literary throwing fuel on an already out-of-hand fire in the name of some right-wing ideology that is proving to be whoefully lacking at a time when level heads and cohesive solutions are needed most.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, Susco said:
Glad we have all those experts on this forum, who know everything so much better than professionals.
https://www.healthline.com/health/smoking-vaping-covid-19-risks
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/vapers-smokers-higher-health-risks-with-covid19
I think most people are commenting on the hypocrisy of it all;
vaping (banned and not giving government any tax revenue) BAD
smoking (backed by large conglomorates and providing a healthy tax revenue) - 'insert sound of crickets'
- 1
- 1
-
3 hours ago, BigC said:
Stop using the word racist
I live and have a thai family for <deleted> sake
I am nationalist not a racist
I beleivein putting our own people first
How many English people working and being treated as good as we treat ridf raff foreigners in UK
If we go to Romanian or any country whete these people come from ahd behave like they do
How long do you reckon we would last
Try complainng i Romania that you cannot get a job there because your white British
They shall laugh you out the country
And rightly too
Thailand puts thais first
I like it
I respect it
Unlike allot if people who come here to moan
Like trunp sayss" if you don't like it leave "
What are the 2 things nationalists hate?
1. Being called racist.
2. Black people
-
6 minutes ago, Skallywag said:
Yet everyone is not "suffering and struggling" in the USA. Government workers are all "working" from home and getting paid. Congress, is the same, they have guaranteed income and paid health insurance from taxpayers. They also have the money to have excellent food delivered by restaurants or grocery stores, and have large backyards to go out and garden,recreate, and swim. And they are the ones we are supposed to trust to understand the "suffering" of others
Not all government workers are working from home. What about those deemed 'essential workers' which number into the millions?
However I agree with the gist of your argument but rather than just point a finger at Congress, your argument can be extrapolated out to the haves and the have nots as this pandemic is already disproprtionately affecting the weak, the vulnerable and the poor and will continue to do so until someone in charge (and there's a laugh) takes proper control.
- 1
-
Just now, Logosone said:
The example of Sweden shows clearly that if a government leaves it up to their own people on whether to self-isolate chaos does not necessarily ensue.
It also shows that mortality rates are not of the catastrophic Hollywood proportion that people like Neil Ferguson had proposed, if social distancing is not made mandatory for the healthy.
We do have data for Sweden, it's not the case that there is zero data. And Sweden's data is certainly not worse than the UK's, where social distancing and lockdown is enforced hard.
And yes, there are less people on the streets in Sweden, but you can still go for a massage, go to a restaurant, go to a cafe, get a haircut, if you're so inclined, without presumptious mask nazis hassling you with hysteric fear in their eyes. Normal life is very much possible in Sweden, even if of course the virus had some impact (some people voluntarily stay at home).
I think you've made your views on your beloved Sweden very clear. There really is no need to keep beating this drum.
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, bestie said:
I guess that's the reason why the USA is so struggling with it. People are divided and the "right wing" is pushing their agenda forward by risking people life. They don't even care. On YouTube and even here in the forum. They have a complete different opinion of what "Freedom" means. It's pur egoism. I'm so tired to see pictures of "Life or die" "Is just a flu" or "Back to work". All these little naysayers are becoming online the smartest politicians. The reality is , they have blood on their hands. Jesus. America is really Fck up. I don't see such a mess in any other country right now. Maybe Aussies are following.?
You right now looking at "only" 2k death per day in the US, if the US opens up again and go back to life like it was before you will looking up up to 3 Million Death only in America. Up to 300k death per day. If you want to risk your life it's ok it's your freedom. But don't come close to other people who want to protect their own life and the life of their family.
I lost my hope that the US will ever "wake up" again from this Nonsense right wing BS agenda with all these little YouTube "stars" who are experts in everything. Give me a break. Please. These Guys are insane. I know the Virus comes from 5G and from the communist. Of course. Jesus.
Yes, of course there will be a life coming after the virus. But in the meantime please stop to try to be an expert and give people false security. Get used to it how the "new normal" will look like. Everyone is suffering and struggling with it. ---- Sorry but I can't take these people anymore.
There's plenty of them here on TV, mindlessly regurgitating the latest 'update' from Fox or OANN or Rush Limbaugh. And the worst? Trump is backing them.
Whether it's 'LIBERATE MINNESOTA", "LIBERATE MICHIGAN" and then "LIBERATE VIRGINIA" (why is he always shouting on Twitter), the false narrative perpetuated by the US right wing media and Trump himself is astounding in it's ignorance and very dangerous for the American people.
Now is a time for facts and strong guidance, neither of which Trump is a fan of.
- 1
- 1
-
21 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:
That's an estimate. No one knows if it would be that many in reality. If the at risk were isolated, it should be a lot lower.
What is your estimation of those that will die because of the lockdown? Poverty kills too. Even if it doesn't kill, it destroys lives, increases crime and violence. Is that your preferred option? I think it is either lockdown/ poverty or herd immunity.
IMO herd immunity is the best option for the greatest number of people. I understand that for those that are directly affected by death it is a tragedy, but it's a question of the least of 2 bad situations. If it makes any difference, I would likely be among the casualties, but I don't think my life is more important than the many that will be ruined by lockdown.
I'll give you my estimation of 'those that will die because of the lockdown' - zero. Nada. Zilch. With the exception of countries that are already experiencing famine and extreme poverty (which aren't the ones we are talking about), I don't think a single person is going to die of starvation from poverty due to Covid.
Also, herd immunity is based on a very tenuos proposition; that those who are infected cannot be infected again, but the BIG problem with that is we are already seeing previously infected getting re-infected again;-
https://time.com/5810454/coronavirus-immunity-reinfection/
And since you guys think all MSM are just fake news:-
I'm pleased you don't think your 'life is more important than the many that will be ruined by lockdown' and we will glady accept your sacrifice for money.
-
16 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:
I agree with your points with the exception of borders. Borders should be kept closed till the crisis is over. Resources can't be wasted on border control, except for trade. With VDO conferencing there is no need for people to travel for business.
When Germany started bombing London, Britain had legally passed parliamentary authority to impose a blackout.
Good of the masses, indeed. However the lockdowns will cause more harm to more of the masses than the virus if we were doing what Sweden has done. They have the sensible solution, IMO.
THAT is the real danger.
Isolate those at risk, keep social distancing, test and isolate, carry on.
When it's all over we will see if lockdown or the Swedish solution was the right way. I'm going with Sweden.
You have every right to your own opinion but you do not have the right to your own facts. The jury is still well and truly out on the 'Sewish experiment' and there are limited/zero facts to say either way. But although it's difficult to base an informed opinion on right now, it's not like Sweden is just the same as it's always been. They have already closed their borders, are isolating the elederly and 'at risk' individuals on a large scale, have conducted testing (and again isolating the infected) and although self-isolation is voluntary it is also widespread (sorry but no figures).
This idea that Sweden is exactly the same is a misnomer that poeple have to stop falling back on.
Covid19 - no need to panic - still
in COVID-19 Coronavirus
Posted
Fair point well made.
We can disagree on the social distancing thing but I wholeheartedly agree that heads should roll in the UK. Complete farce from start to finish.