newnative

I've never read a bad one, either. Thanks for the Chris Carter recommendation.

I have wonderful Thai in-laws and I welcome their visits. Spouse and I are just about finished with our new house, which will have more room for when family visits.

I'm surprised he's still alive, as out of shape as he is. Massive heart attack waiting to happen.

Yes, indeed. Top 3 spots. And, just wait until the Sealion 6 gets up and running. We were at a BYD dealer to take a test drive and there were 5 buyers ahead of us doing the same thing. Fortunately, the showroom had a very nice waiting area. The dealership was quite crowded with potential buyers, with a number also looking at the Atto 3, Seal, and the Dolphin.

Too funny! Everything she mentioned, every single thing, Trump could care less about. He lives for the trivial, the unimportant. Instead of focusing on what's important, he spends his time thinking of new names to insult people with and new lies to tell, with, of course, massive grifting thrown in. Crowd sizes? Don't even think of telling Donald they are not important!

Repairs could easily come to 120k, especially if there is water damage to contend with.

Outrageous and criminally stupid behavior by Disney. Let's see . . . Should I pay a tiny $50,000 settlement, especially since someone died and I am likely guilty of their death, or should I try an insanely stupid, blatantly unfair tactic of using the fine print in a streaming agreement in an attempt to block the piddly $50,000? In favor? Maybe save $50,000, but no guarantee. Against? Millions of dollars in extremely bad publicity and, likely, a much larger settlement in the making. Reminder: David is the good guy, Goliath the bad guy. Not a good look for a family-focused company to always be the big, bad, bully. Did they not learn a single thing from the Scarlett Johansson fiasco?

Unbelievable--especially after just booting MFP. No shame whatsoever.

Spouse and I should have started in Pattaya rather than Rayong when we first moved to Thailand.

Lately, I've been reading the novels of Christopher Reich, which I am enjoying, including a couple of series and a few standalones. Also have been reading the excellent Virgil Flowers detective series by John Sandford, who is famous for the highly popular 'Prey' novels. I've got the latest Daniel Silva downloaded and that's next on my reading list. This novelist has an excellent suspense series going with Israeli spy/art restorer Gabriel Allon as the main character. Happy reading.

Good news abounds.

Yellow Bank is my favorite, especially the Central Festival Pattaya branch. Runner-up would be Bangkok Bank, where I also have an account.

Umm. Since when is a president's performance judged by the number of votes he received in an election? Nixon did very well in the '72 vote . . . You'll note I generously rounded up Trump's 2020 vote to 74,224,000, giving him those extra votes he was illegally trying to steal in Georgia.

Actually, 74,224,000. Not 78 milion--yet another exaggeration regarding Trump. For the record, he lost by 7 million votes. Biden was the choice of 51.3% of the voters. In two elections, Trump has never garnered even 50%. He lost to Clinton by 2.8 million votes but was appointed president by the cursed Electoral College. After his one term as the worst president in US history (thanks for nothing, EC!) the voters rightly booted him out. In two elections, it's clear that the majority of the American voters don't want him, always going for the alternate choice. Likely to be true in 2024, as well.

Hold the hype. Neither 'bizarre' nor 'alarming'.

Oh, dear. How utterly awful! She agrees with something Trump is also in favor of. My goodness, we cannot have that--it 'sparks controversy'. Well, boys and girls, in the days of yesteryear, that was not the rarity that it is now. And, politicians from opposing parties agreeing to something would not 'spark controversy'. Often then, both parties could be for something that benefitted the country, or a segment of it, and it would just be a matter of compromising on the details. Hence, politics being termed 'the art of compromise'. For example, the majority of both House Democrats and House Republicans voted in favor of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. NASA was proposed by a Republican president--Eisenhower--and passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress. Compare that to the Affordable Care Act, which passed the Senate without a single Republican vote of support. No Republicans were in favor of affordable health care for Americans? Not even one? Seriously? Likely some were but were pressured to not give a win to the Democrats. Sad that these days, too often if a Democrat is for something, a Republican is automatically against it, no matter what it is. And, vice versa. It's often a struggle to get just a few politicians from the opposing side to vote in favor of something, let alone a majority. God forbid that one party or the other gets credit for initiating something beneficial. Certainly cannot have that either.

555 Yes, wouldn't Trump 'desire' to 'step away' from the abortion issue. It's a big loser for him, and despite his claim that it's not a 'big factor' in elections, clearly it is. He lost the women's vote in 2020--57% voted for Biden--and that cost him the election. Interestingly, 54% of women voted for Clinton in 2016, so he actually lost ground with them in 2020, after his one horrible term as the worst president in history. Likely he will do no better with women in 2024, and certainly isn't helped by his 'cat woman' dud of a VP choice. (Hint to Trump: When you're forced to step in front of a camera and declare that a VP choice doesn't make a difference in an election, you've lost that argument.)

Walk it off. You'll live.

I stand ready to hear the screams of 'DUAL PRICING'. Oh, wait a minute. Foreigners get in FREE and Thais have to pay 5 THOUSAND BAHT to enter. Never mind.

Yes, an old trick, and one of many. The objective is to suppress the vote as much as possible. Why? Look to Donald Trump for the answer. He famously said that if you make voting easy, Republicans will never win another election. So, you make voting as difficult as possible. You oppose mail-in voting. You oppose early voting. You oppose same-day voting registration. You post armed 'observers' at voting places to intimidate voters. You restrict voting places and put them in places difficult for voters to get to. You send an attorney for Arizona's Republican Party to the Supreme Court to defend voting restrictions that have been put in place. At least the attorney was refreshingly honest. When asked by a Supreme Court justice why these restrictions were needed, he frankly stated that they helped the Republican Party and hurt the Democrat Party. Noted.

They don't seem to be learning their lesson. Every time they dissolve the party, the new iteration emerges even stronger. Another thread has the new People's Party at 84% support, with PT at 9%. Clearly, Whack-A-Mole isn't working.

Stunning number. Thais may not be rioting in the streets over the horrible MFP decision but they are letting it be known exactly what they think of the decision and will get their revenge at the next election.

Color me one of the unbothered. Voters voted for or against her as part of the Biden/Harris ticket in 2020. She was known to be Biden's running mate in the 2024 primary process. Delegates, representing the voters, can choose to vote for her or someone else at the convention. And, in the general election, voters can vote for her or any other candidates on the presidential ballot in their state.

Umm. What country are you from? It's not the 'far left' that wants to 'change the electoral college'. Instead, it's The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Instead of the 'far left', it's 17 states that have voted to award their electoral college votes to the winner of the popular vote. The Compact would go into effect once enough states ratify it to reach 270 electoral votes. Currently, enough states have signed on to have the tally at 205, with legislation pending in several other states.

It bears remembering that the polls were correct in 2016. Trump did lose 'by a huge margin' of actual voters--2.8 million more voters wanted Clinton than Trump. The election wasn't even close with the popular vote. The cursed Electoral College over-ruled the wishes of 65,800,000 voters and appointed Trump president.