Jump to content

earlinclaifornia

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4,394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by earlinclaifornia

  1. 5 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

    Exactly, what biden rallys. Perhaps this time he'll be forced to explain to the American people how their lives are better during his 4 years vs Trump era.

     

    https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-BIDEN/POLL/nmopagnqapa/

     

    U.S. President Joe Biden's public approval was at 40% in recent days, close to the lowest level of his presidency, with Americans unhappy about his handling of immigration and inflation, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll showed.

    But, but didn't we agree polls don't count and votes don't count just rally numbers make America Great Again.

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

    I am starting to think it may all be part of a cunning plot on the part of CNN. Much like how the Democratic Party deliberately supported radical GOP candidates in the run up to the 2022 mid term elections. They want Trump as the GOP nominee because they think he is beatable.  More than any of the other candidates.  So they give him a forum and a relatively receptive audience to work his magic with. 

     

    And it just might work. 

    Agreed.  It would have been easy for him to add something new but that is not part of his brand.

    He has no chance to win the Presidency ever again and that is all that is important

    It was a win for Trump and I wonder if other Independents were going to be swayed. I do not think any RINO's were in attendance.

    • Sad 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

    A new law was instituted, she took advantage of it, case closed. I think I wrote earlier that he would not be found liable for rape but would be found liable for defamation.  TBH I didnt know there were lesser accusations (battery etc) included as well.    I would say he should pay the lady (he has experience doing that) and get on with life. 

    I agree. Those defending his actions need to understand we in media are not  qualified to judge but the jury is and only they decide. Evidence counts.

    Just saw this from his admiration on new evidence:

    https://www.mediaite.com/tv/alyssa-farah-says-she-reported-countless-cases-of-trumps-impropriety-the-way-he-engaged-with-women-was-dangerous/

    Alyssa Farah Says She Reported ‘Countless Cases’ of Trump’s ‘Impropriety’: ‘The Way He Engaged With Women Was Dangerous’

    • Like 2
  4. 7 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

    I never said it was a conspiricy. I don't care who is accused 30 yrs later of rape, it shouldn't make it to court. I don't know anything about the metoo cases you speak of.

    Are you aware of this enacted back in February 2023?

    https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/new-york-adult-survivors-act.aspx

     

    New York Eliminates Time Limitations for Sexual Assault Claims

     

  5. 5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    Wow, "man", you're the one who's out of touch.  Fox did not admit that they lied and paid off the plaintiff to avoid a long and embarrassing public spectacle.

    As I understand it, court cases are for US dollars as settlement option only. Apologies are not derived from a jury's option.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    "I thought cancelled was the same as fired!"

    Why would you think that?

     

    "Can you prove with any links as to him not being cancelled or fired please?"

    Can you prove with any links as to him being fired please?  There's lots of verifiable information about him that's easily available and I'm referring to "firings", not "cancellations", whatever that is. supposed to mean

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucker_Carlson

    I guess "no longer employed" or "doesn't have a job here anymore" is the most accurate wording. 

  7. 18 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    Yes, he's done so badly for himself, hasn't he?

    Incidentally, he was not "fired" from PBS, nor CNN and is still "employed" under his contract with Fox.

    I thought cancelled was the same as fired! Can you prove with any links as to him not being cancelled or fired please?

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  8. 9 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

    For sure.  Seems like he would be better serve to work independently. But he has nearly 7 million Twitter followers and was pulling in north of 3 million viewers a night on Fox.  Obviously there is a market for his brand of commentary.  Just a matter of time.  

    His followers are not going anywhere is the truth. But thats actually their problem and not anybody elses

    Some of us are ecstatic his career is over in MSM

    • Like 1
  9. 3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

    For sure.  Seems like he would be better serve to work independently. But he has nearly 7 million Twitter followers and was pulling in north of 3 million viewers a night on Fox.  Obviously there is a market for his brand of commentary.  Just a matter of time.  

    One per cent of the population is not what I had ever considered as immpressive but you can think it, so it will be true. 

    • Thumbs Up 1
  10. 52 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

    Freedman is a smart, talented, and vicious lawyer.  He will get what Tucker wants done. Hell, even Don Lemon has retained Freedman for the same reason.  


    Might take a while, but you will see The Tucker back in media in some form.  Fox is feeling the wrath now of jilted viewers who are going elsewhere, and it isn&t going to improve any time soon.

     

    Related news, I was shocked at listening to the ratings for The Daily Show. In the last season with Jon Stewart in 2015, they averaged 1.3 million views. These days with Trevor Noah, they are down to less than 400,000 and doing even worse in the key demographic group.  I guess talent DOES matter!

    So your' still thinking is he will rise again?

    Even though he has the record of firings so far!

    PBS Fired

    CNN Fired

    MSNBC Fired

    Fox News Fired

    Doubtful 

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  11. 2 hours ago, vandeventer said:

    It's a shame Mr. Trump has to try and recall ever knowing this lady, on something he didn't do 27 years ago. Is she writing another book? Is she after a quick buck? Or is she just trying to be in the spotlight for once? Again, the truth will always come out in the end.

    Most all of us  Americans believe in our fair judicial system. We all agree the jurors who have served will decide who is telling the truth and stand by their decisions'.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...
""