earlinclaifornia

On 10/23/2023 at 10:30 AM, bamnutsak said:

 

Bodies Netflix

 

I'm 4 eps in and can recommend this. Can't comment much without spoiling, better to experience it with no foreknowledge

9/10.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrJUDWRDTos

 

 

Enjoying Bosch: Legacy S02 Freevee. 4 eps in, two released per week. Classic Bosch. 9/10

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZpfJIpH0No

 

As with John Wick, Lance Reddick is missed.

 

 

Also enjoying Lessons in Chemistry, Apple TV+, but few here might find it interesting.

 

 

Same here and am enjoying this so far.

29 minutes ago, recom273 said:

There’s also Boss Level, doesn’t feature Gerard Butler, but again Frank Grillo, the guy who played the artist in billions, from the same writing / directing team.

 

We don’t seem to watch many movies these days, it’s easier for me to watch an episode or two of a good series than sit for 2.5 hours on a movie. Even if it was a bit cliched, the production, casting, score and effects applied in 3 episodes of the continental was a prime example, given the choice of that or the new MI time cruise offering? 

Same here it was great crime. 

52 minutes ago, Mutt Daeng said:

I enjoyed this. I quite like Gerard Butler and his movies are mostly decent IMHO.

Excellent recommendation. 

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

That was an opinion piece published by the NY Times.. If you think it doesn't matter, that is your prerogative.

Seems your world wide article choices looking sorry is my take or a prerogative I choose. That exposure makes me want to suggest you spend more time understanding each point of view. Just my opinion, so don't take it personally. 

3 hours ago, Longwood50 said:

As I have previously stated.  This is a political witch hunt.  The "injured" party would be the bank.  They were not injured.  They also should be the one to bring the lawsuit claiming fraud.  They did not. 

Who did.  His political opponents. 

This is like the IRS finding a taxpayer paid all of his taxes but had innacurate information on the returns that didn't impact the taxes due, then claiming a false tax return. 

The underlying premise of a fraud is that it causes people to lose money.  A fraud with no victim not a crime.  The valuations are subjective and they were accepted by the bank.  

The government now coming in after the fact and second guessing the bank is purely weaponizing government. 

If the bank was injured due to any fabrication in my opinion that would be different. 

This really is no different than when Hunter Biden was charged with making false statements on a gun purchase.  Few if any are ever prosecuted.  Biden was targeted strictly because he was Biden.  Trump targeted strictly because he is Trump and he has political enemies.  

MAGA has a sad time excusing his torrid actions ongoing. Safe to say they just make up any falsehood to enamor the top liar in Chef. BS is still BS even when you find yourself crying like a baby does.

,

The many MAGA's voices are just deafening!! But wait I hear the sound of them writing checks to the Trump legal team.

I have been there a few times and it's great!

"Some that might know of some options may simply be afraid of such a big change."

I do believe that for Americans, it is the top of the reasoning list. People are reluctant to take action because they would just rather not venture out of a comfort zone.

Reminds me of those that do not go to visit the Doctor until it is becomes too painful.

“I think there were all kinds of problems with the 2020 election,” he said.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), demanded that Jordan admit Biden won in 2020, which Jordan wouldn’t do.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/jim-jordan-admits-election-loss-132432027.html

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/watch/8-of-10-republicans-who-have-declared-or-are-running-for-speaker-are-election-deniers-196128837861

 Third to the Presidency. If that doesn't shock you, nothing will.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kimmel-proposes-mike-lindell-speaker-124500857.html

4 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

The topic is: Trump co-defendant pleads guilty in Georgia election case

 

The 'Feds' are not involved.

Do you expect that will change and both may now want to plead to the Federal inditements next?

8 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

And maybe others will go for plea deals. But note to you and others who like to reference the 'overwhelming evidence', evidence isn't evidence until it is admitted in court.

 

I remember reading an obituary for musician David Crosby who said:  I am really not unlike any other drug addict. The only difference was: I had lots of money.

 

98% of all federal indictments result in plea bargains. There are very few indicted on federal charges who can outspend the Feds.

 

I have always appreciated your caution on these MAGA situations. 

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Kenneth Chesebro, a Trump-Aligned Lawyer, Pleads Guilty in Georgia

 

The fact that there will be no trial next week for Mr. Chesebro and Ms. Powell is a strategic boon for prosecutors. Because they were going to have to lay out large sections of their case against all the defendants to prove that the two at trial were part of a sweeping racketeering conspiracy, lawyers for Mr. Trump and others would have been effectively offered a preview of the case that they would have to defend against.

 

In a statement on Friday, Steven H. Sadow, Mr. Trump’s lead lawyer in Georgia, said that Mr. Chesebro’s guilty plea appeared to be influenced by “the looming threat of prison time.”

 

“However, ” he added, “it is very important for everyone to note that the RICO charge and every other count was dismissed. Once again, I fully expect that truthful testimony would be favorable to my defense strategy.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/20/us/kenneth-chesebro-trump-guilty-plea-georgia.html

 

https://archive.ph/wTcZS

Boon or not it is great that three now have caved to admitting they are going to plead and help. Still the truth prevail with all the other 16 testifying with inside knowledge of Trumps crimes.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/19/politics/sidney-powell-plea-takeaways/index.html

Not for the faint of heart reading reallity .

6 minutes ago, illisdean said:

I am struggling to know what exactly what AQnon is? Not seen this before. Could be a new derivative of the delusional machinations from the loony left .

Struggling, too is no new territory for you. Living in a conspriacy world makes it necessary to take facts and twist them to some sort of a different narrative. So how is that going in MAGA world? 91 inditements and two guilty please. So much winning it is intorrable life you live in.

8 minutes ago, illisdean said:

is this the AQnon knowledge graph?

You exposed but I have a feeling this is not any new territory for you! LOL

5 minutes ago, illisdean said:

And, when he is, it will become most watched program in America watched by all including you.

5 minutes ago, Georgealbert said:

555555 First time you have heard of AQnon,55555 dropped my coffee for the second time today.

 

Another one that says and implies one thing and then back tracks when called out on it. Sure your not JonnyF alternative log in.

 

You remind me of a John Cleese quote on Dunning Kruger effect, google it !

Another domino falling. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/19/politics/michigan-fake-elector-deal/index.html

47 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As many court observers have written, the same evidence as would be presented at the Chesebro trial would be much the same evidence to be used at Trump's eventual trial. They just get a sneak preview. Not that they can challenge anything.

Sounds just what a lawyer would use as a ploy. Lawyer speak, is just all it is. Don't be fooled as the overwelaming amount of evidence is going to be impossible to defend. 

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If it's an opinion you should have made that plain. The forum rules state that anything presented as fact has to be proven.

Right lol

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

Yeah, McHenry would be a reasonable option for the short term.  For the longer term, Dems should consider getting behind Liz Cheney.  She has the conservative credentials which should get some Rep support.  She also hates Trump, which is something every Dem can get behind....555

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/raskin-points-republicans-might-get-dems-support-speaker-rcna120995

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Show us the report by a psychiatrist that has actually examined Trump or it's a lie.

Hey, from the link it is clearly an opinion only. Just because his fact presentaion works for his assesmant 

Waking up late?