Jump to content

lannarebirth

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lannarebirth

  1. 6 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

    Watching the news now in LA they are trying to overwhelm some place called The Grove. This should become interesting as this is a target of economic value. Thus far they have been burning down the pawn shops, auto parts stores and liquor shops in their own areas.

     

    I can't believe the extent of what happened in Minneapolis. This is going to set that city back a long time trying to come back from the virus. 

     

    It seems there are cars on the street that were unaware of what is happening that were looking to shop at The Grove. 

     

    That's right around the block from the LA Holocaust Musem. Hopefully the rioting is limited to retail shops so we don't get overlapping narratives.

    • Like 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    The evidence is Trump cares very much about his lies being challenged.

     

    His fragility on the matter has been demonstrated on a number of occasions.

     

    He cannot stand being called out and held accountable.

     

     

     

    He seems to have you right where he wants you. The only time I've ever seen him genuinely angry is when his own toadies fail to back his move. And, hey, it's an election year and that's to be expected.

  3. 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    It seems to have evaded you, this is a discussion forum.

     

    That's what Shakespeare said:   "This life, which had been the tomb of his virtue and of his honour, is but a walking shadow; a poor player, that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more: it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."  Or sumthin' like that.

  4. 13 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

    That's a fatalistic attitude.  I choose idealism and to work towards that idealism.

    If that were the case you'd be agreeing with him. The Democrats and Republicans only pass laws that Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of and fail to pass the laws that they overwhelmingly desire to be passed. You'd think they were serving a different master than the electorate. And if you did think that way, you'd be right.

     

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

    You seemed to be alluding to the WHO in your example of defunding an agency whose responsibility is to avert world destruction from asteroids.  Trump defunded no such organization but he did defund the WHO.  I think my assumption as to your allusion is spot on.  FYI, I don't imbibe at all and I'm located in Thailand.

     

    I did not say he defunded it. I said I don't care who wins so long as they don't defund it. For your edification, the agency charged with that is The Center For Near Earth Object Studies, a collaboration between NASA and the JPL.

    • Like 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

     

    Your belief that Trump is the cause of and responsible for Wuhan virus deaths in America is about as biased and untruthful an opinion one as one could have.  Laughable . . . and sad to see people so easily duped by their own beliefs.

     

    If you can point to one post of mine that suggests that Trump is the cause of SARS C0V-2 I will surrender my membership to this platform. That his actions have contributed to a marginally higher death toll is not quantifiable but he does feed those ignorants that are not taking responsibility for themselves or others and that is unforgivable IMO.

     

    My own belief is that Americans have elected for the past 3 or more decades, leaders that have made the country a laggard in all things for the benefit of a very few. Medicine, education, governance, critical thinking, all in decline in America. My own opinion is that Trump is not better or worse than Biden who would also lead America on that steady downslope. Trump at least is useful in making a change, as long as he doesn't defund whichever agency is charged with protecting us from near Earth astroids, at which point the issue will become moot. 

    • Sad 1
  7. 16 hours ago, trainman34014 said:

    One week too many, next week too few, next week too many again.  Can these people 'organise' anything at all properly ?

     

    One can only surmise there is a "middle man" orchestrating all this confusion and not only will they be profiteering from it but they'll probably receive a government subsidy to do so. My first guess would be CP.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  8. 1 minute ago, simple1 said:

    Matter of opinion, personally I see his latest move adding to trump's politics of division which are harmful to the nation - i wouldn't name that as good political instincts.

     

    It's only harmful if one has a polarized point of view. If your objective is to heal the nation over holding your polarized point of view, then it's all useful. Bear in mind it took us decades to get here and it's going to take almost as long to claw our way back.

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, sirineou said:

    What does that have to do with law that protects social media companies?

    why was such legislation good good all this time that he occupied the white house but it is not now? 

    How does fact checking violates 47 U.S. Code § 230

    Is it possible that your reply is a Pavlovian response? 

     

    It's possible but unlikely. So, are you saying that every law that is on the books that came into being before Trump became president is a good law?

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...