dinsdale

Unprovoked? Iran is/was working on an ICBM and the enrichment is/was at 60%. Doesn't take long to get from 60% to 90% which is what is needed for a nuclear warhead.

Makes sense.

Yeh right. The Iranian regime are the good guys.

I'm now hearing 12 MOP's were used for Fordow.

A better question would be how many terrorist actions has Iran carried out and funded? This is not a country that should have nukes.

Denying the most dangerous regime on earth the capability of making the most dangerous weapon on earth isn't how I would define war mongering.

Be interesting to see if Iran launches a missile attack on Israel today. Been pretty quiet on that front for a while.

Why do you think this? Putin for sure won't do anything nor will China. If anything now would be a good time for China to invade Taiwan. As for Turkey why?

Why do you assume that if GBU-57 were used it would be 100% destroyed. It's not as straight forward as that. Was the facility completely taken out is the question. No doubt the damage would be substantial from 6 GBU-57's (this is the number I'm hearing so 3 B2's just for Fordow) but this doesn't mean the entire underground facility was taken out. Iran is saying it hasn't been destroyed. As I said above we'll have to wait and see.

Trump's saying (I'm watching it live) that Iran's nuclear facilities "have been completely obliterated". BTW the only way Fordow could be totally obliterated is with the GBU-57 dropped by B2's. Let's wait and see if they have actually been "obliterated".

MOP's were dropped. Simple as. No other reason for B2's to go in. Very expensive pieces of equipment to both run and put at risk just to send a message. A message, however, was sent and this is how it was delivered ....

Sure mate. Then why don't you tell us what type of bomb, other than a tactical nuke, could take out (possibly, we still don't knowhow effective these hits were) the heavily fortified enrichment facility buried 80-90 metres under a mountain and protected by rock and UHPC. Any ides?

Yep. the two weeks of which there were many comments about from the usual suspects on here was a diversion. No way he could give them two weeks. As for those TACO commenters now's your chance to admit you were wrong.

They won't other than diplomatically. China will kick up a fuss because of the oil.

Why were B2's used? You're simply arguing for the sake of arguing and ignoring the bleeding obvious. It was no secret that the B2's would be using the MOP's.

There will be no US boots on the ground in Iran.

Ridiculous comment that takes my comment completely out of context. The Iranian regime is one of if not the worst in the world.

Try thinking. What type of bomb was needed? What type of bomb is it that only the B2 can carry?

Of course it might lead to the overthrow of a very, very nasty regime.

Of course they were. Why else would they go in?

A country not far off of building nukes and a country that sponsors state terrorism.

The U.S. military conducted air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan on Sunday morning local time, President Trump announced. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/21/us-strike-iran-nuclear-israel-trump I wonder haw many B2's went in so how many MOP's were dropped and I also wonder just how successful this has been or will they go in for a second strike?

The U.S. military conducted air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan on Sunday morning local time, President Trump announced. https://www.axios.com/2025/06/21/us-strike-iran-nuclear-israel-trump I wonder haw many B2's went in so how many MOP's dropped and I also wonder just how successful this has been or will they go in for a second strike?

Ah! The "narrative". Seems your mind is still closed and you are a "true believer" in what MSM tells you. As for Ivermectin and for that matter Hydroxychloroquine there is data to support efficacy in combating the severity of symptoms if given very early in the onset of symptoms. These drugs were dismissed as being useful by a study or two (funded by big pharma?) that showed these drugs were ineffective but what these studies did was give the drugs too late into to the onset guaranteeing their lack of efficacy. BTW both these drugs were used in Thailand until the WHO citing these studies told countries to stop using these drugs and instead rely on the brand new experimental "vaccines". In conjunction with the push to use the jabs was a campaign of demonisation which we all remember and some of the ignorant on here still maintain. "Ivermectin is for horses not people" is an excellent example. This in and of itself is misinformation but was used as a propaganda tool for big pharma and pushed heavily by MSM.