kwilco

No they couldn't...they are classed as a motorcycle with no special status...they would still need a full D/L and an IDP. Otherwise they could still be disqualified by any insurance

There is no such thing as a "scooter" it is a colloquialism that doesn't exist in Thailand or international IDP.

This has been covered many times before. Firstly insurance cover needs to be checked. Most companies will put a 125cc limit on machines rented. Most rented bikes are between 100 and 160 cc so you need to be careful when renting. Some companies don't cover motorbikes at all...they are regarded as "extreme" activities. The idea of SCOOTER is a fallacy there is no such legal term anywhere. The bikes for rent are mostly step-thoughs, but they have 2 wheels and as such are motorbikes. Thailand does not recognise any 2 wheeled vehicle as anything but a category A motorbike on the IDP under the Vienna treaty. US has not ratified this treaty. Thailand has in 2020. Without a valid IDP, insurance may be voided anyway. To ride a motorcycle in Thailand you need an IDP and a FULL motorcycle licence from home. Any "moped" "scooter" or provisional licence is not sufficient. Before you leave home, get your IDP and make sure you have category A m/c on it...A1 is no good. PS insurance in Thailand is unlikely to cover you after 3 months in the country... you need a Thai d/l by then

You are talking nonsense

So you think the government should vary the length depending on time of year?

and replace it with what?

If Thailand wants to be a tourism hub for S.E.Asia (and let's face it, there's nothing Thailand likes more than being a hub) then they need to make it easier for people to come to the country and pp in and out - a 90 day plus exit permit or rules would allow people to base themselves in Thailand and visit neighbouring countrie without worrying about flight dates etc etc.

Like most places in Thailand it is build first and worry about utilities and infrastructure later

not an isolated incident.

had he done base jumps before?

The outbreak in Shianghai in 1988 was down to contaminated shellfish.

AFAIA, I believe live flukes are a freshwater problem

certainly used in the UK.

Not quite sure how that subjective comment relates to the OP apart from one observation - that is your a more likely to get a tummy bug from eating Western food in Thailand than eating local foods, due to the technology used is preparing and serving western style foods with which Thailand is still relatively unfamiliar.

this thread is about parasitic infections and others from certain types of food - a lot of your posts are seeing issues inaccurately in black and white. Flukes can be transmitted through unwashed veggies but raw and undercooked fish and meat is the main cause. You are diverting the argument unconstructively. While treated human waste has been used as fertilizer throughout history, it wasn't widely used in developed countries until much later due to concerns about sanitation and regulations. UV light treatment is primarily used for wastewater disinfection and didn't play a significant role in treating waste for agricultural purposes. Composting can be a great way to recycle organic materials and add nutrients to the soil. Leaving plant roots in the ground can contribute to this process as they decompose. However, there are no "little round balls of natural nitrates" on roots. Plant nutrients are distributed throughout the root system. Some plants, like potatoes and tomatoes, can harbor diseases that can spread to subsequent crops. It's generally recommended to remove and dispose of these plants instead of composting them. The key takeaways are that composting utilizes natural processes to break down organic matter and release nutrients, and careful consideration should be given to the potential disease risks associated with certain plants.

i think you need to re-ready post -it's about how little vegetables are contaminated by bacteria.

E-coli is a vast range of bacteria - with hundreds of species they are everywhere. not just homans Most locals get immunity from common local strains which is one way people get travel bugs. Composting human waste toilets are used all over the world without any problems. You should also understand that Nitrate and nitrite are oxidized forms of nitrogen that are typically produced during the later stages of composting,

You are wrong.

Thailand looks like it has a ruling elite who use a puppet judiciary to keep anyone they don't like out of politics. Occasionally they get it wrong - it will be interesting to see what they do nest to keep Pits out of they way.

PS - was that a spelling mistake or a freudian slip? How about telling what your "doctrine" is, then?

"spelling" - that is the best you can do? What has that got to do with the discussion - if your ideas are wrong, correct spelling doesn't make them any more correct

"Dictrine"?? - There you go...ill-informed and out of touch. Claims of qualifications are worthless, it is the information you post that counts.

THe results of this parasitic infection have been explained on this post, i.e. cholangiocarcinoma, or bile duct cancer, THe results of drinking are tangential to this thread - hence the false dichotomy. Are you trying to suggest that one glass of alcohol would give you liver cancer? THe normal result of drinking is sclerosis amongst other things - I can't understand why anyone should think justifying drinking in anyway mitigates the problem assiciated with parasites - unless of course they are are suffering from another effect of alcohol - brain damage. Infections by flukes are usually treated with a drug called triclabendazole, this doesn't work with alcohol as the parasite is on the outside

THat's a rather facile response - firstly the effects of alcohol etc are calculated by numbers in millions - you are just one - but when it comes to parasitic infections it is a different health issue that can be avoided - you are making a false dichotomy.

Rubbish! You don't understand how bacteria settle and thrive - You've read something somewhere about bacteria on vegetables and famously got it wrong. most bacteria are on the surface of uncooked meat where they thrive. As for vegetables themselves, they aren't inherently sterile, but they can indeed harbour bacteria from various sources. Here are some of the main culprits: Soil and water: Vegetables grow in soil and are often irrigated with water, both of which can contain naturally occurring bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella. Manure: Some farmers use manure as fertilizer, which can introduce harmful bacteria into the soil and onto the vegetables. Animals: Wild animals and insects can come into contact with vegetables during growth, potentially leaving behind bacteria like Listeria. Handling and processing: During harvesting, transport, and processing, vegetables can come in contact with contaminated surfaces, equipment, or human hands, introducing bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus. So wash vegetables, but don't be paranoid. Washing with clean water significantly reduces bacterial levels on vegetables. it removes soil, dirt, debris, and so a good portion of surface bacteria. Peeling some vegetables can also further reduce bacteria. Some veggies are more prone to bacterial contamination than others: Leafy greens: Due to the large surface area and tendency to trap dirt, leafy greens like spinach (watch out Pop-eye!) and lettuce require a good washing. Bean sprouts are grown in warm, humid conditions, which are ideal for bacterial growth. You should wash or cook/blanche before consuming them. Pre-cut vegetables are convenient, but have more exposed surface area, making them prone to contamination during processing. As I said, ta large proportion of people actually contaminate themselves - e.g. hygiene in the kitchen, including washing hands and utensils frequently, can prevent the spread of bacteria fand hand to mouth contamination is very common - that is why smoking is banned in kitchens in most countries.