BangkokReady

Because you're foreign and many Thai men hate foreign people and want to physically attack and injure them.

You think wealthy Thai men pay their wives one million baht a month?

This is why she did it. It's all about wanting to appear high value. Many believe that the more you ask for, the more you must be worth. There's no way she's going to get it. She probably knows this also.

Obviously I'm making a hypothetical analogy. I wasn't actually claiming such a group does or should exist. Geese... 🤦‍♂️ It's clear who is making the stupid comments here.

Not really. If a founding member of "Straight Pride", a group that aimed to promote a positive image of straight people, raped a 12 year old girl, people would point out the irony 100%.

Sounds like you use weights. Thanks for proving my point.

I presented facts. Do with them what you will.

Do you perform "the king of all lifts" with rubber bands or with a bar with weights on?

Facts are facts. If you want to ignore them, that's fine. I just wanted others to know that weights are the best and have real health benefits for old age, both in terms of the body and the mind. If you don't like that, I'm not really that bothered.

What does that have to do with the facts I shared?

"You don't have to use weights, you can use things that work the same as weights." Sure, I guess. 🤷‍♂️ Bands aren't going to do the same thing as weights though. There's a certain amount of effort that you need to make to see the benefits. Similarly, with body weight, the issue is that it's tricky to get the same range of movements and exercises that way. You can do some pull ups, some press ups, etc. The problem is that that's kind of limiting, and many aren't actually strong enough to do enough repetitions. Weights are best.

Walking and weight lifting are 2 different things. If you dont lift weights, you will never truly be fit. Indeed. Weight training has been linked to an increased quality of life in old age, including less chance of mental degradation. Walking is great, and everyone should be walking every day anyway, but you need to really get your heart rate up and lift weights.

And you are not ready for reality. Hence you spout nonsense and claim Thais (who aren't helping) will definitely help (even though they aren't).

You think Thai people are going to foot the bill for this guy's medical care? When the wife is already saying that they've run out of money and are trying to sell furniture just to buy basic things? If Thais are going to pay, why aren't they paying?!! It's you who has lost the plot!

In upside down world (AKA loony lefty land), sure, it makes absolute sense.

When you think about how pervasive lying about Trump is, this really means nothing. This could literally mean, "Look at how low the left will sink to try to discredit Donald Trump".

I'm not sure what this has to do with your misunderstanding of my post. Are you saying you've realised your error now and want to move to a different topic?

Absolutely. That's why I used the word "seems".

From that, you concluded Trump must have significantly increased world peace. But that’s not reasoning — that’s circular logic dressed up as inference and a textbook non sequitur — you're treating the nomination as both cause and proof: Trump brought peace → got nominated → therefore brought peace. Nope. Check again. I made it very clear, at the start and throughout the thread. He has increased peace, therefore he is deserving of/has been rightly nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. Never once have I claimed that he must have increased peace because he has been nominated. That's all in your head. You're desperately clutching at straws and making things up, because you have no argument. You can keep saying this, but it remains irrelevant garbage. Keep lying, by all means, but your lies are extremely obvious.

Yawn. Semantics! He increased the peace in the world on multiple occasions. More than enough to make him deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize. Stop trying to deny this very basic and simple truth.

What cult? The truth cult? The fact cult? The honesty cult? I guess I am pretty keen on those.

And the left/MSM would win a very special award for the most lies told about a US president!

Here's why what you have said immediately falls down: I didn't say that nomination indicated that Trump had significantly increase world peace, I said that he had significantly increased world peace, which is why he was nominated. Increasing peace leading to nomination = bar not lowered. If you have to change what someone says to argue against it, your argument immediately falls apart. It's so weird that you wrote all that stuff that makes you sound smart, but missed that very basic step at the start. So thank you for confirming the lack of faut in my logic. Not even slightly. If you reread what you actually wrote, those other figures have nothing to do with your claim that the bar is low.

Why does a president who has done so much to increase world peace being nominated for a Nobel Peace prize lower the bar for said prize? Significantly increase world peace = get nominated for peace prize. Is there a fault in that logic?

You can't really mix these two concepts. "If there was a prize for..., Trump would win." Or: "If there was a competition for..., Trump would be the world champion."