BangkokReady

So explain then... ???? (You're also not making much sense yourself.)

Not completely true. There have been some claims that relate Biden sr to Biden jr when it comes to business dealings. And the investigation isn't concluded yet.

I have no idea how this relates to anything I have said. I guess you're just trying to deflect?

How so? What attack dogs? What are you talking about? How does such a comment apply to what I said in the slightest?

All self inflicted, I feel sorry for the poor little b*******ds he's fathered. Potentially self-inflicted, but he didn't explain all the things that led to all these mistakes. The chance that he had two loving and supportive parents, along with living in a reasonably well-off area, with all his emotional and physical needs met, while not impossible, is unlikely.

It sounds like it is still being investigated.

I don't remember saying anything about what kind of "proof" was available. What you are writing continues to be ridiculous and have nothing to do with what I have written.

What "truth" can you find in the comment I was replying to?

It's not about the population being stupid, it's about them being Thai. This thing happens all the time to allow people to save face or get away with corruption. Generally people know not to say anything publicly about it and just go along with the story. After all, they will probably want people to ignore their corruption at some point, so it's kind of reciprocal. It gets a little awkward when people suddenly demand to know what actually happened. Generally this only occurs when the corruption is seen as being too high so people complain, or it's too public so someone needs to do something about it so they don't lose face.

Sorry, this is just a mess of words. I can't really make any sense of it. I apologise if you aren't trolling and you are genuinely having some sort of problem, but it really does look like trolling. I'm not sure how else to respond.

You don't know what "whataboutery" means. The meaning of my post is perfectly clear. You can try to deflect, of course, but it isn't working.

Your post makes no sense whatever. I'm guessing you're just trolling?

He hasn't even made it back yet. Give him some time, I'm sure he'll look to settle some old scores once his proxy is in place and he's had time to acclimatise.

Basically, if Biden rented himself out, but the money went to Hunter, he's not off the hook.

The people whose job it is to investigate corruption don't want details of the corruption of someone they investigated to be released? Says a lot about what their actual role is. ????

I don't think anyone wants a new government to be formed that quickly.

Translation: "Please don't use any civil disobedience in your civil disobedience." The whole article is a joke. Gandhi organised strikes and marches, and King's group held demonstrations and sit-ins. Both of these could be considered comparable to blocking a political party's office.

But, if they want to ensure the above never happens, then the below can never happen either. Since without the protection of the senators, a party that wants to do away with 112 can be elected next time. In order to protect 112, the senators have to be able to choose who will be in power, not the electorate. ????‍♂️

He could have just prefixed it with "Although we deserved it..."

Not at all. Dropping the bomb saved countless allied lives. The Japanese had a "death cult" and were planning to fight until the end, suiciding themselves if necessary. Their treatment of prisoners of war was evil and likely they would have massacred them all during the invasion.

Quite. It was about ending the war as quickly as possible, with saving as many allied lives as possible. This is OK, given the context of the time.

This is not democratic.

Depends. Are the Red Shirts happy? If they are, how much does that take away from the groups who are actually likely to protest?

One is the case of people ignoring the shortcomings of a politician due to personal feelings about what is going on in politics, the other is the same.

I don't see what your opinion on Biden really has to do with people trying to keep the facts out of the conversation when it comes to his suitability as a candidate. Or are you saying "It's worth doing because Biden is better than Trump"?