BangkokReady
-
Posts
10,766 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by BangkokReady
-
The man in the article was threated with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace. -
Are You Reading AI-created Fake News?
BangkokReady replied to Lee65's topic in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
How could you possibly know that you've never been scammed? What if someone scammed you but you never found out about it? -
I'm simply pointing out what happened. Some people are saying something that didn't happen. I am saying what did happen.
-
He did not.
-
Why? That is what happened! "I will arrest you to prevent a breach of the peace" is very different from "I will arrest you for being Jewish".
-
Nobody has said that it is.
-
You're doing that, not me. No aloofness. Just honesty. 🤷♂️
-
That doesn't mean he was threatened with arrest for being Jewish. It's as simple as that. Clearly, I am not.
-
You're agreeing with me that he wasn't threatened with arrest for being Jewish?
-
Exactly, which means he wasn't threatened with arrest for being Jewish. I'm a little confused as you appear to say that you don't agree, then go on to say that you do... 🤔
-
Are You Reading AI-created Fake News?
BangkokReady replied to Lee65's topic in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
It was awful and obviously fictional, based on the content. There were also a few tell-tale signs suggest it is AI. -
So you agree that he was threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace and not for "being Jewish"?
-
Are you saying that doing this would retroactively change the reason that the man was threatened with arrest? Because I'm not sure what else this brings to the discussion.
-
To prevent a breach of the peace.
-
I'm not sure what this has to do with someone being threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace and not because of being Jewish. 🤷♂️
-
Help with what? Preventing a breach of the peace? It really depends on the circumstances.
-
I'm not patronising you at all. Your comments make it clear that you don't understand the law being discussed, so recommending that you look it up is in no way arrogant or patronising. I know what the truth is, and the Met apologising doesn't affect what actually happened. Nothing. I'm simply telling the truth, and you don't seem to like that. 🤷♂️
-
If they weren't making a profit, what would be their purpose? Some sort of front for another activity?
-
The casualty rates are irrelevant, as those weren't elements that I was comparing. Things don't need to be exactly the same to be able to compare them. Precisely. And the North weren't trying to liberate the South in Vietnam. I'm not sure how you think you can discuss something you don't even appear to understand. You don't know how to compare things and you don't understand what I wrote.
-
While this might be true, it isn't what happened.
-
Who said he was committing a breach of the peace? As I said, look up breach of the peace. You don't know the meaning of the words you are using, so you cannot fully understand what is being discussed.
-
Later, perhaps.
-
How is it a crime? The Policeman didn't say it was. Where are you getting this from? It isn't in the article. The Police officer said he would arrest him to prevent a breach of the peace, not because he was Jewish.
-
No. It is different.
-
Are they still profitable? That's all that really matters.
