Yellowtail

You are coming across as being rather pathetic, you really never could keep track.

So, your next purchase "...will be an EV, 100%." Sounds pretty biased, no?

Only to the senseless lol

You only have ICEVs because you are biased against EVs. If you were really unbiased, you would have an EV and an ICEV.

I think it's nice to have a picture of the car with the ribbon, the flowers and the giant key. My wife loves the one she has with the Fortuner. And don't forget to drive over the limes....

Oh, "because", got it.

Does no one look at the links provided?

If you're not biased, why do you not own an EV?

Wind up

No one would dare think that of you...

It's just because the bottom has fallen out of gas prices.

Sure, here is unequivocal proof: https://shorturl.at/b5WxZ

Only the left is allowed to make unsupported claims. Just do like they do, make a claim and then post a link to anything. If they come with: "Hey, that does not support your claim!" Just respond like they do, and just say yes it does!

The sites I have looked at show them being fully customizable. And a sandwich wall panel is likely cheaper than glass as well.

"If you think you're not that old, start dating women your own age."

The difference between Israel and Hamas, is that Hamas wants to kill every Jew in the world and would if they had the means. Israel just wants Hamas to surrender unconditionally.

Why do you say that? Do you think they are going to bomb you? If you think people are complaining about collateral damage in Gaza, wait until it's thirty kids at a school in Santa Monica.

The founders (who the left generally have contempt for) allowed for the citizenry to have the most sophisticated weapons of their day. And had Congress envisioned that millions of illegal aliens would be flooding across the borders and having anchor-babies they certainly would have adjusted the 14th Amendment accordingly, yes? There is a process for amending the Constitution, and if it regards something people want, it would not be difficult. Using the court to circumvent the law is just kicking the can down the road.

It is a toy for gun enthusiasts. Far and away, most gun deaths in the US are related to handguns. Like all issues, the left really does not care about gun deaths, they care about keeping the issue going.

The three dissenters did. The others considered the actual definition, which is there to read, and which bump-stocks clearly do not satisfy. Just like an electric drill with a cam-lobe you could fit into the trigger-guard and fire it really fast would not satisfy the definition. The definition is the problem, not the court. How many lives do you think banning bump-stocks saved?

How could they possibly be firing rockets from an open-air prison?

What I said was: "They need both, but to claim they need the mother more, without knowing more about the mother and father makes little sense." Your response was: "So you want fathers to teach daughters about periods, bras and being a woman. How ridiculous. Then you want mothers to teach sons about cutting trees down and changing a tyre." I think children need both parents. Do you really think a male infant is better off with his father, really?

So, if the mother is a drug addicted prostitute, and the father a pediatrician, you would still want the girl to stay with the mother so she could learn about her period and whatnot. "What makes little sense is the ideas people come up with."

They need both, but to claim they need the mother more, without knowing more about the mother and father makes little sense.

As long as the judges are leftists, then yes, that is what he wants.