Jump to content

onera1961

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by onera1961

  1. I got hammered here on TV for paying 15K plus I believe 1900 to have mine done. Had to go to BKK first time to get income Doc. Don't remember any certification on the back. Gave my lady income doc, lease, pp and two photos. Picked up my extension I recall a few days later. Now I just renewed last month, took ten minutes of my time plus I can call her anytime if I have a question or problem. Bargain for me because I have no patience with that crap, I just want it done. I have residency in both Brazil and Costa Rica and each cost me thousands and years to complete. Here it basically took one trip to BKK and if my funds had been seasoned it would have taken less than an hour on my part. It is good though that you got the experience!
    Is it possible you can share the agent's name in a private message? I want to use the service

    Sent from my BND-L34 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  2. On 5/25/2018 at 12:04 AM, Rob4 said:

    We have:

    1. proof of a lot of money in her account

    2. proof of work for her in vietnam

    3. hotels

    4. flights tickets go and back

    Go to a local travel agent and he will sort out the visa issues for you Vietnamese friend. You should not have any issue getting a TV to Thailand that you can extend for an additional 30 days.

  3. On 5/16/2018 at 10:39 PM, JRUSA said:

    Mr. Joe..I was thinking or moving my direct deposit of my pension directly to Bangkok bank. If I use the NY office will it still have to be transformed to my branch in Pattaya or just go directly in my account.

    It will directly go to your direct deposit account. Direct deposit account has certain restrictions, e.g. only teller withdrawal. However, you can open a second account that is not direct deposit account. And set up recurring online transfer from direct deposit account to normal savings account for ATM withdrawals. 

  4. 10 hours ago, Pilotman said:

    I am here on a Non Immigrant O visa on marriage to a Thai National.  I want to get an extension of stay based on retirement.  I have the Embassy letter proof of income and I'm clear about the rest of the documentation needed, but  I do not have a Thai bank account.  I just use money from the ATM when I need it.  Is this a show stopper on getting the extension?  

    As many posters have posted it depends on the Immigration office. Using an ATM to draw money from an oversees bank for daily expenses for a long period of time is a very expensive proposition. My strategy is to move $2500 every month from US banks to Bangkok bank and use the money for daily expenses when I am inside Thailand. It gives me more control over my expenses (kind of my expense limits and budgeting) and provides a safe guard in case immigration ever asks to check my bank account even though I will be using embassy income letter for extension in the future. I'm on a Non O-A long stay visa now.

    • Thanks 1
  5. 1 minute ago, moe666 said:

    Someone I knew here in Chiang Mai had a small restaruant and she went to labor department and told them give my husband a work permit I need his help and they gave it to him

    Good. I think if somebody is married he should have wok permit. Deporting married people on the flimsy excuse of illegally working in their own establishment is very uncivilized.

    • Like 1
  6. 2 hours ago, OmegaRacer said:

    Then stopped and Immigration just changed the reason for the visa to 'marriage'. 

    I think this is the classic confusion we see again an again about visa and extension fo stay,

    Your extension of staying was changed to marriage. It used to be business with work permit.

     

    I think a good test is to ask yourself if you can you enter Thailand without a reentry permit? If not, you don't have any visa. You just have an extension to stay in Thailand. If you can enter, it means you multiple entry visa that us still valid or it has not expired yet.

  7. 27 minutes ago, sbaker8688 said:

    If my visa expires while I'm in Thailand, I have to leave the country.

    Absolutely not true. May be that is the confusion you have. I am not sure anywhere in the world, you have to leave the country if visa expires while you're inside the country. You have to leave the country when your permission to stay will expire. May be the confusion comes because people are yet to grasp the concept of visa expiration date and permission to stay date.

    Take a simple example of US visa that are frequently valid for 10 years multiple entries (expiration date 10 years from the date of issue). However, each time you enter the US, you will be stamped how long you can stay in the US. Even if the visa is still valid, you have to leave the US on or before your permission to stay date.

    Similarly, when you Enter Thailand before the visa expiration date, your visa may expire when you're inside the country but you are able to stay in Thailand based on your permission to stay date (not visa expiration date).

     

    Again, visa expiration date and permission to stay date are different. The date may be the same for some countries. But the concepts are always different for every country

  8. 7 minutes ago, sbaker8688 said:

    Then you are refuting what was said by those who chimed-in before you.

    UK/Shenzhen Visas say From date Until date. May be they copied wordings from them. They should have copied American visa which says expiration date. Still I don't find any confusion in the wordings. All are the same.

  9. 4 minutes ago, sbaker8688 said:

    Valid-from / valid-until doesn't tell you exactly what the thing is that is valid.  It's ambiguous.

    Yes, it is the visa that is valid until date xxxxx. That means you can present yourself to an IO and seek permission to enter the country on or before date xxxxx. Still can't comprehend where is the confusion. All visas throughout the world count down right away, and you are losing time every day you aren't in using the visa to enter the country. How about expiration date? Is it less confusing? That's what US visas use. Not sure about UK and Shenzhen visas

  10. 4 hours ago, sbaker8688 said:

    Because it is ambiguous.  The go-to interpretation for most people I know (including me) was that "valid from-until" pertained to the validity of the VISA ITSELF, i.e. the VISA ITSELF was valid from whenever to whenever.  Since it always pays to be pessimistic rather than optimistic, that was also the more pessimistic interpretation.

    Not sure what is the confusion about Valid From (a date) and Valid Until (a date) unless someone has nor grasped the meaning of a visa. All visas have a Valid Until date. They may call it expiration date (like in a US visa) or Enter before date. Whatever they call it (expiration date, valid until or enter before), you must present yourself to an IO at the port of entry to seek permission to enter the country on or before that date.

  11. 2 hours ago, sbaker8688 said:

    So what exactly is the valid from-until?  Is it sort of like the enter-before?

    I wonder why so much confusion for a simple concept. A visa is a document to seek permission to enter a country at a port of entry. In the above example, Valid UNTIL is 23 Feb 2018. That means you can go to any Thailand's port entry on or before 23 Feb 2018 and seek permission to enter the country . After 23 Feb 2018, you cant use the visa to seek permission to enter the country.

    The second part is permission to stay in a country until a specified number of days or a date. This information is stamped in the passport. For Thailand with a tourist visa, it is 60-days. So, if you present your visa on 23 Feb 2018 at a Thai port of entry, you will be allowed to stay in Thailand till 22 April 2018.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...