Chomper Higgot

Jonny’s off on his Whataboutary again.

No but the Bible does, it goes as far as to liken the woman’s praying in the street to the behaviour of hypocrites. At the very least she doesn’t seem to have much faith in the power of the god she says she’s praying to; surely he can answer prayers from anywhere, they need not be delivered in the street, the Bible goes as far as to say they should not be. Mathew 6:5-6 “5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.”

Not in the UK they can’t. A. Under UK law, at the point of birth .

No they were volunteers for the Government. They were not employed by, engaged by or in anyway funded by the Government.

You understand nothing of the sort. The law, introduced by the last Government, is clear. Yet another of your martyrs broking the law.

Not the UK in any official capacity at all.

You remember incorrectly. No person acting on behalf of the UK did any such thing.

Refer linked examples I have provided above.

Examples of why the law to provide safe access zones around clinics offering abortion services linked below: https://www.bpas.org/media/uwflorww/2022-august-clinic-harassment-update.pdf

No the UK did not.

The applicable law was enacted by the previous Tory Government.

Abortion is not killing babies. Abortion, in the UK, is a personal and private health choice and is not the business of anyone other than the woman seeking an abortion and her health providers. The ‘safe access laws’ (Public Order Act) governing protests near clinics providing abortion services are there precisely to protect the right of women to obtain healthcare privately and without interference from anyone else., religious nuts included.

There’s a member of this forum who in the last year posted his experiences of going home to get NHS treatment, it’s not at all uncommon.

Self insure LOL.

Don’t knock it Jonny, you wouldn’t be the first British expat to be on the plane home if ever you get seriously ill. Many British expats in Thailand don’t have health insurance, their backstop is a flight home, their adventures here effectively underwritten by the NHS.

Easily dealt with. Let the world’s press in and let them do their job of freely investigating and freely reporting what they see.

I think that’s ’in another thread’.

Yes is called protection women’s right to make their own health choices. Your freedom of speech stops at the surface of anyone else’s body. Now go for coffee.

He will. The chaos and uncertainty his idiocy gives rise to will harm investment in the U.S. and give rise to costs to US consumers. Insider traders however will make a killing.

Ill-informed nonsense, the EU’s common economic area was created by removing tariffs for those nations that joined it, those nations that didn’t, and the one that left, don’t get the membership benefits of zero tariffs.

Donny will U-Turn, like he always does.

Back to topic: “BBC Faces Backlash Over Alleged Bias in Coverage of White Farmer Killings in South Africa”

Let me demonstrate the bias in your statement: Alleged bias is allegedly breaking the rules of the Royal Charter.

During wartime the U.S. has relied heavily on foreign intellectuals to develop the means to win those wars. I’m not sure on what basis you claim America is done with anything, let alone the things you personally are consumed with.

Feel free to offer your suggestion for alternative news sources.