Chomper Higgot

So no motive has been given, the police have cautioned against speculating on the motive but you think you know the motive and rant at me for pointing out you do not. Fact Proton, no motive had been confirmed.

Well now the facts have been released, information that was not available at the time of my statements at the time. Now let’s see your evidence that the attacker is a Muslim?

Post your evidence of me lying Jonny lets see what you’ve got. Or is this wriggling thing you refer to projection on your part?

Then how about proving evidence that it was deliberately withheld.

Again you repeat your allegation of lying, but provide zero evidence to back your allegation. I suggest you come up with some evidence.

You don’t seem to understand the difference between acts committed and motivation for committing those acts. The police have given statements on acts committed, they have given no indication of the motivation for those acts. https://www.merseyside.police.uk/news/merseyside/news/2024/october/statement-from-chief-constable-serena-kennedy-and-partners-following-further-charges-for-axel-rudakubana/

You need to first tell me what I should apologise for. If you want to alleged I lied or spread misinformation then the onus on you is to demonstrate the truth of your allegation. So let’s have your evidence.

What lie of ‘no motivation’?

An you please provide evidence that the information was deliberately withheld.

Again what lies did I spread. Let’s see you provide facts available at the time that contradicted my posts.

How so? What have I said since today’s police statement that contracts what that statement says?

Then you’ll have no problem providing the factual information available at the time that contradicted my post.

No my post that James quoted was not misinformation, at the time I posted it was correct. Right now the connection to Islamic terrorism is possession of terrorist material from an Islamist terrorist group. No motivation has been given. So let’s stick with the information we have.

How so?

It seems all it takes these days is for you to assert an identity.

It’s nevertheless an example of misinformation.

How is that misinformation? It’s a question that was consistent with the available information at the time of asking.

Who was jailed for spreading misinformation?

He’ll shortly be banging on about crowd size, he’s too easily baited.

Which I guess is why Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic, have been spewing vitriol at her.

Racist comments about immigrants, and fear mongering seem to be the go to.

Well it might fall flat with Piers Morgan (not an American and hence not a voter), but at least he had the ear of the NYP and Trump supporters, both foreign and domestic.

Trump’s team might have ‘distanced themselves’ from the racism presented, to the delight of the MAGA audience, at Trump’s MSG Rally, however Trump has not. Turning up late for a press conference he himself called he avoided the issue entirely. It’s a massive home goal and a gift to the Democrats: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/29/donald-trump-puerto-rico-press-conference-00186043 The infighting has commenced: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna177925

What even FOX?

The Telegraph are obviously not looking forward to the budget. News of a 6.7% increase in the minimum wage is perhaps an indication that this Government has pivoted away from a sector of society The Telegraph feels is the rightful recipient of Government care and attention, or at least not the care and attention The Telegraph wishes to see. Tomorrow we’ll have an opportunity to talk about actual Government policies rather than opinions The Telegraph itself plays a party in manipulating.