Chomper Higgot

If might correct you. Most foreigners haven’t heard of them. Forgive me, I can’t be bothered with the rest of your ill informed diatribe.

If you say so: https://www.citizen.org/news/progressive-policies-are-popular-policies/

Most? All are cowards.

I didn’t.

The Prosecution have asked the Judge to rule on three cases of Trump violating the gag order he’s under. The Judge will hear these cases on Thursday April 23. I’m guessing Trump will be wide awake during that hearing.

Another example of the judge being fair and balanced. Contrary to what Trump and his supporters would have us believe.

Here’s the laugh out loud, tone deaf hypocrisy of that argument. Trump supporters are busy making the argument that the politically biased SCOTUS judges he himself nominated will save him from any criminal verdicts Juries hand down against him. Some going as far as to argue they will only accept a Jury’s guilty verdict against Trump if it’s upheld by the Supreme Court. The claim the SCOTUS will save Trump is a common refrain from Trump supporters both foreign and domestic.

It’s a smart move. When he’s sleeping he’s not speaking and exposing his progressing aphasia.

Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Wes Moore, Gretchen Whitmer, Roy Cooper, Elizabeth Warren and real blue collor Politician Randy Bryce. To name but a few. Lots of Democrat talent and none of the ‘my guy or nobody’ cult nonsense.

Maybe, but I recall more than one ‘love’ emoji in response. Her brief tenure was disastrous for the nation, she clearly lacks any introspection, let alone sense of responsibility or guilt. She’s barking.

More ill informed nonsense. The Democrat party has plenty of talent and is not engaged in any kind of ‘leader cult’.

She’s a barking. Has she forgotten the events in Syria and Russia driving refugees into Europe while Trump sat back and let Putin do whatever he wanted. Capitulation is not peace and has resulted in what capitulation always results in. Oh and let’s not forget that bit about why Truss was really removed by her own party - fiscal insanity. …… I recall a member of this forum posting that he fancied her. Let that sink in.

He has the look of a man sucking on the taste of aluminum.

I have little doubt you are right in your conclusion. But since when did anyone accused of a crime need to provide evidence of their innocence?

Minor correction. The Trump DOJ put Cohen in prison for ‘that nothing’.

The people who told you this day would never come are now busy telling you he’s going to be acquitted.

If Trump is found guilt and it is turned over at appeal I will accept the appeal verdict. Hold me to it. ….. Now your turn. If Trump is convicted by the jury then his appeal is rejected by the Supreme Court or he fails to appeal, will you accept the Jury verdict?

So a guilty verdict that doesn’t get as far as appeal at the Supreme Court isn’t a guilty verdict?

I will accept whatever verdict the Jury hand down. Hold me to it. I have zero expectation that you will accept any guilt verdict against Trump under any conditions. Hold me to it.

All with intent to commit another crime, which raises the misdemeanor to a felony: https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Where on earth did you drag that nonsense from? There 34 Indictments!

If Trump is convicted it will be by the Jury, not some bogeyman ‘left’. Which brings me to the following question: Will you accept the jury verdict whatever that verdict is?

What we must all keep in mind is we non of us have any idea of the scope and extent of the evidence and testimony that will be presented. It’s readily assume there are going to be a few bombshells.

Up steps Michael Cohen, witness and narrator. Moreover, Cohen is articulate and structures his words extremely well.

Imaginary threats of riot.