When you state the narrative seems to be, then insert a narrative.
It’s for you to demonstrate that what you claim is the narrative is indeed what you yourself claim it to be.
You can then take your questions to those who have made that the narrative.
While you are here.
Fo you condemn the attacks by the rioters against the entirely innocent Muslim community? Do you condemn the property damage by the rioters?
Do you condemn the violent attacks on police officers by the rioters?
I think you are right, people from across the political spectrum, indeed across the whole of society are very rightly outraged over this heinous crime.
But it’s not everyone who’s out rioting, attacking a completely innocent community, destroying property and violently assaulting the police.
Yes sure you were.
Except I have the receipts telling us all precisely who you were responding to.
Do you want to withdraw your ‘mis-speaking’ or do you prefer to be owned by it?
‘Someone like me’?
How about you go to the top of the thread and read what the OP (not me or someone like me) said:
Here’s a clue:
“The number of unlawful crossings by migrants at the US southern border has decreased for the fifth consecutive month, according to official data.”
On the other hand I did say:
Border crossings are down, Trump, his supporters and those who pretend not to be his supporters are not happy.
Forgive me for responding to your post.
When did I claim have any expertise in this matter.
My opinion is, Trump scuppered the bipartisan border legislation in order to deny President Biden a win and maintain the border as a political issue for the election.
Border crossings are down, Trump, his supporters and those who pretend not to be his supporters are not happy.
Oh and there is clear blue sky between the Democrats and the Republicans, there is no equivalence between the two.