Chomper Higgot

Sorry Susan, I’m simply taking Trump at his word. Now if you wish to claim he was lying through is teeth do so, but do not claim he did not say what he said. Facts matter. It is a fact that Trump said those things. Quit with your gaslighting already.

Trump did not say he would be a dictator on day 1? Trump did not say ‘you won’t have to vote again’?

Except it’s fact. Facts you don’t want to accept, but nevertheless facts.

Which ‘left loonies’ are promising to be a dictator and ‘you won’t have to vote again’? Put up, or quit with the false equivalence.

In the way Trump said it. He’ll be a dictator on day one. Now he’s said ‘you won’t need to vote again’. You know, the ‘Trump tells it as it is’ thing.

You assume my ‘lack of understanding’.

Your support for rioting ant violent attack in the police is noted.

I imagine millions of public service workers will be glad of the pay rise they’ve been denied for so long, while £hundreds of millions were waisted on corrupt schemes run by Tory Government chums and pished away in Rwanda. Pensioners who are not in receipt of Pension Credit or other Means Tested Benefits are far from ‘the most vulnerable in society’.

Government inherits £22Billion hole in public finances is the real news.

As I observed a couple of days back, Harris going back at Trump is a refreshing and positive change. On top of the obviously well earned ‘weird’ tag for Trump and his shaky running ‘mate’, she’s also challenged Trump with ‘If you have something to say to me, say it to my face’. Masterful. Let’s have more please.

I’m sure you are. Now all you have to do is put up some evidence of me supporting Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

let’s look at the data, though I don’t see a ‘loony left’ category: https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2024/6/3/majority-of-voters-approve-of-trumps-guilty-verdict

Another law and order crusader who goes on the lam when he’s on the receiving end of the law and order he wants everyone else to be subjected to.

You forgot to add your customary denial of being a Trump supporter. I only mention it incase there’s room for confusion on the matter.

Clearly explained logical thought gets you thinking about slurping cool-aid.

More certainly a statement.

Keep it classy Nick.

Let me explain this to you in very simple terms. President Biden withdrew from the running (he was not the Democrat candidate). Once he had withdrawn any support for his candidacy was irrelevant, he was no longer seeking the nomination. Harris is a good candidate, witnessed by her energizing and uniting the Democrats, I hope she does get the formal appointment as the Democrat Candidate.

They were engaging in something that belongs in the bedroom? I missed that.

If that helps you come to terms with the fact Harris is uniting and energizing the Democrats and gaining in the polls then stick with telling yourself that lie.

Link

1. “as it was intended for Jurists to not be stained by corruption” Well that’s not gone too well has it? 2. “If Federal Judiciary held lifetime seats, they would not feel the need to"repay" anyone or any party, and could make rulings based on their interpretation of the Constitution.” But if they did feel the need and or had fallen short of #1, then they have a life time to enjoy their corruption. 3. Engage that UC Berkeley Constitutional Law thing of yours and explain precisely what in President Biden’s proposals warrants this assertion: “Stripping the ability of the Judiciary from "checking" the excesses of the Legislative Branch would be the beginning of real totalitarianism in the US.”

It’s because you don’t understand that there was no cult of Biden.

I think you were directly replying to the post you actually replied to.

I’m sure you’ve been told a million times not to exaggerate.