The ‘facts’ in the article are no such thing.
They are statements by a pro-Israel website linking to Twitter accounts and Israeli press.
Another example of precisely why we would all benefit from the world’s news organizations being permitted to enter Gaza and report on what they find there.
The UK Government have full control of UK Borders.
Who are they and their supporters going to blame for the Government’s abject failure on immigration?
Weisselberg, a $750,000 bung got mentioned in court right at the end of Friday’s session.
Defendant Trump’s lawyers let out out a bit of a tell with their objections as the Judged declared he’ll spend at least some of the weekend considering hauling Weisselberg in for a chat.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/10/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial/weisselberg-in-court-00157368
You’ve added CAMERA who are an organization founded to engage in pro-Israeli news activism. Topically founded in response to news reports of an earlier Israeli incursion into somebody else’s land.
The link I provided includes criticism of CAMERA, they are not without their own faults.
There is a war, there is obviously a battle over reporting of the war as demonstrated by organizations involved in Pro-Israeli news activism and very definitely by the exclusion of international news organization reporters from Gaza.
CAMERA are involved in a great deal more than ‘fact checking’.
And that ignore thing, does it apply to ‘why CAMERA were established and under what circumstances’?
I’m not deflecting’ Camera are engaging in exact behavior as Josh Levs, refer my criticism of that above.
That Camera were established in response to news reports of earlier Israeli incursion somebody rise’s land simply underscores the point.
“The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to The Washington Post's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".
Oddly in response to news reporting of Israeli incursion into somebody else’s land.
A pattern is emerging.
At it again Jonny.
Posting completely irrelevant nonsense.
Proof of your claims regarding protests in Malmo this week is what, stuff from London that was reported back last November?!
What a desperate mess your arguments are becoming.
Jonny,
I think we’ve had this discussion before.
Deal with the views and arguments I actually express and not those your fetid imagination dreams up on my behalf.